Research Service, Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development, Center for Health Information and Communication, Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana2Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of.
Rheumatology and Immunology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 May;175(5):682-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.97.
Despite the prevalence and the functional, psychological, and economic impact of chronic pain, few intervention studies of treatment of chronic pain in veterans have been performed.
To determine whether a stepped-care intervention is more effective than usual care, as hypothesized, in reducing pain-related disability, pain interference, and pain severity.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a randomized clinical trial comparing stepped care with usual care for chronic pain. We enrolled 241 veterans from Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation New Dawn with chronic (>3 months) and disabling (Roland Morris Disability Scale score, ≥7) musculoskeletal pain of the cervical or lumbar spine or extremities (shoulders, knees, and hips) in the Evaluation of Stepped Care for Chronic Pain (ESCAPE) trial from December 20, 2007, through June 30, 2011. The 9-month follow-up was completed by April 2012. Patients received treatment at a postdeployment clinic and 5 general medicine clinics at a Veterans Affairs medical center.
Step 1 included 12 weeks of analgesic treatment and optimization according to an algorithm coupled with pain self-management strategies; step 2, 12 weeks of cognitive behavioral therapy. All intervention aspects were delivered by nurse care managers.
Pain-related disability (Roland Morris Disability Scale), pain interference (Brief Pain Inventory), and pain severity (Graded Chronic Pain Scale).
The primary analysis included 121 patients receiving the stepped-care intervention and 120 patients receiving usual care. At 9 months, the mean decrease from baseline in the Roland Morris Disability Scale score was 1.7 (95% CI, -2.6 to -0.9) points in the usual care group and 3.7 (95% CI, -4.5 to -2.8) points in the intervention group (between-group difference, -1.9 [95% CI, -3.2 to -0.7] points; P=.002). The mean decrease from baseline in the Pain Interference subscale score of the Brief Pain Inventory was 0.9 points in the usual care group and 1.7 points in the intervention group (between-group difference, -0.8 [95% CI, -1.3 to -0.3] points; P=.003). The Graded Chronic Pain Scale severity score was reduced by 4.5 points in the usual care group and 11.1 points in the intervention group (between-group difference, -6.6 [95% CI, -10.5 to -2.7] points; P=.001).
A stepped-care intervention that combined analgesics, self-management strategies, and brief cognitive behavioral therapy resulted in statistically significant reductions in pain-related disability, pain interference, and pain severity in veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00386243.
尽管慢性疼痛普遍存在,且会对功能、心理和经济造成影响,但针对退伍军人慢性疼痛的治疗,很少有干预研究。
为了确定阶梯式护理干预是否比常规护理更有效,假设可以减轻与疼痛相关的残疾、疼痛干扰和疼痛严重程度。
设计、设置和参与者:我们进行了一项随机临床试验,比较了阶梯式护理与常规护理对慢性疼痛的影响。我们招募了 241 名来自持久自由行动、伊拉克自由行动和新黎明行动的退伍军人,他们患有慢性(>3 个月)和致残性(罗伦兹·莫里斯残疾量表评分≥7)的颈或腰椎或四肢(肩部、膝盖和臀部)的肌肉骨骼疼痛,参加了评估阶梯式护理治疗慢性疼痛的研究(ESCAPE)试验,从 2007 年 12 月 20 日至 2011 年 6 月 30 日。2012 年 4 月完成了 9 个月的随访。患者在一个部署后诊所和一个退伍军人事务医疗中心的 5 个普通内科诊所接受治疗。
第 1 步包括根据算法结合疼痛自我管理策略进行 12 周的镇痛治疗和优化;第 2 步,12 周的认知行为疗法。所有干预措施均由护士护理经理提供。
与疼痛相关的残疾(罗伦兹·莫里斯残疾量表)、疼痛干扰(简明疼痛量表)和疼痛严重程度(分级慢性疼痛量表)。
主要分析包括 121 名接受阶梯式护理干预的患者和 120 名接受常规护理的患者。9 个月时,常规护理组的罗伦兹·莫里斯残疾量表评分从基线下降了 1.7(95%可信区间,-2.6 至-0.9)点,干预组下降了 3.7(95%可信区间,-4.5 至-2.8)点(组间差异,-1.9[95%可信区间,-3.2 至-0.7]点;P=.002)。简明疼痛量表疼痛干扰子量表评分从基线下降了 0.9 点,常规护理组下降了 1.7 点,干预组下降了 0.8 点(95%可信区间,-1.3 至-0.3)点;P=.003)。分级慢性疼痛量表严重程度评分从基线下降了 4.5 点,常规护理组下降了 11.1 点,干预组下降了 6.6 点(95%可信区间,-10.5 至-2.7)点;P=.001)。
一种结合镇痛药、自我管理策略和简短认知行为疗法的阶梯式护理干预,可显著降低慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛退伍军人的与疼痛相关的残疾、疼痛干扰和疼痛严重程度。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00386243。