Thomson Cynthia J, Pahl Hanna, Giles Luisa V
School of Kinesiology, University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada.
Can J Pain. 2024 Aug 19;8(1):2352399. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2024.2352399. eCollection 2024.
Until recently, treatments for chronic pain commonly relied on in-person interventions, and despite more hybrid care options today, capacity for delivery remains challenged. Digital programs focusing on the psychosocial aspects of pain may provide low-barrier alternatives.
Through a randomized controlled trial, we investigated the effectiveness of a multimodal mobile application.
Participants (198; 82% women, mean age = 46.7 [13.1] years; mean pain duration 13.6 [11.2] years) with nonmalignant chronic pain were randomized to either a 6-week intervention ( = 98) or a wait-listed usual care group ( = 100). The intervention involved regular engagement with a user-guided mobile application (Curable Inc.) informed by the biopsychosocial model of pain that included pain education, meditation, cognitive behavioral therapy, and expressive writing. The co-primary outcomes were pain severity and interference at 6 weeks.
We observed significant improvements in the intervention group compared to the control group with estimated changes of -0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.04 to -0.29, < .001, = 0.43) and -0.60 (95% CI -1.18 to -0.03, = .04, = 0.27) for pain severity and interference, respectively. There were significant improvements across secondary outcomes (Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System pain interference; pain catastrophizing; anxiety, depression; stress). Frequency of app use was correlated with improved pain interference ( < .001) and pain catastrophizing = 0.018), and changes from baseline persisted in the intervention group at 12 weeks ( < .05).
A short-term mobile app intervention resulted in significant improvements across physical and mental health outcomes compared to wait-listed usual care.
直到最近,慢性疼痛的治疗通常依赖面对面干预,尽管如今有了更多混合护理选择,但治疗能力仍面临挑战。专注于疼痛心理社会方面的数字项目可能提供低门槛的替代方案。
通过一项随机对照试验,我们研究了一款多模式移动应用程序的有效性。
将198名非恶性慢性疼痛患者(82%为女性,平均年龄 = 46.7 [13.1]岁;平均疼痛持续时间13.6 [11.2]年)随机分为6周干预组( = 98)或等待名单上的常规护理组( = 100)。干预包括定期使用一款由用户引导的移动应用程序(Curable Inc.),该应用程序依据疼痛的生物心理社会模型设计,包括疼痛教育、冥想、认知行为疗法和表达性写作。共同主要结局是6周时的疼痛严重程度和干扰程度。
与对照组相比,我们观察到干预组有显著改善,疼痛严重程度和干扰程度的估计变化分别为-0.67(95%置信区间[CI] -1.04至-0.29, <.001, = 0.43)和-0.60(95% CI -1.18至-0.03, = 0.04, = 0.27)。次要结局(患者报告结局测量信息系统疼痛干扰;疼痛灾难化;焦虑、抑郁;压力)也有显著改善。应用程序的使用频率与疼痛干扰改善( <.001)和疼痛灾难化改善( = 0.018)相关,干预组在12周时从基线的变化持续存在( <.05)。
与等待名单上的常规护理相比,短期移动应用程序干预在身心健康结局方面带来了显著改善。