1Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA; 2Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA; 3University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FINLAND; 4St. Johns Research Institute, Bangalore, INDIA; 5UCT/MRC Research Unit for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA; 6School of Health Sciences / Sansom Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, AUSTRALIA; 7CIFI2D, Faculdade de Desporto, University of Porto, Porto, PORTUGAL; 8Centro de Estudos do Laboratório de Aptidão Física de São Caetano do Sul (CELAFISCS), Sao Paulo, BRAZIL; 9Kenyatta University, Nairobi, KENYA; 10Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, COLOMBIA; 11University of Bath, Bath, UNITED KINGDOM; 12Tianjin Women's and Children's Health Center, Tianjin, CHINA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Oct;47(10):2062-9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000649.
To determine the relationships between moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), vigorous physical activity (VPA), sedentary time, and obesity in children from 12 countries representing a wide range of human development.
The sample included 6539 children age 9-11 yr. Times in MVPA, VPA, and sedentary behaviors were assessed by accelerometry. The body mass index (BMI; kg·m) was used to classify children as obese based on z-scores (> +2 SD) from World Health Organization reference data.
The mean (SD) times spent in MVPA, VPA, and sedentary behavior were 60 (25) min·d, 18 (11) min·d, and 513 (69) min·d, respectively. The overall proportion of the sample that was obese ranged from 5.2% to 24.6% across sites. The odds ratios for obesity were significant for MVPA (0.49; 95% CI, 0.44-0.55), VPA (0.41; 0.37-0.46), and sedentary time (1.19; 1.08-1.30) in the overall sample. The associations of MVPA and VPA with obesity were significant in all 12 sites, whereas the association between sedentary time and obesity was significant in five of the 12 sites. There was a significant difference in BMI z-scores across tertiles of MVPA (P < 0.001) but not across tertiles of sedentary time in a mutually adjusted model. The results of receiver operating characteristic curve analyses for obesity indicated that the optimal thresholds for MVPA (area under the curve [AUC], 0.64), VPA (AUC, 0.67) and sedentary behavior (AUC, 0.57) were 55 (95% CI, 50-64) min·d, 14 (11-16) min·d, and 482 (455-535) min·d, respectively.
Greater MVPA and VPA were both associated with lower odds of obesity independent of sedentary behavior. Sedentary time was positively associated with obesity, but not independent of MVPA. Attaining at least 55 min·d of MVPA is associated with lower obesity in this multinational sample of children, which supports current guidelines.
确定代表广泛人类发展水平的 12 个国家儿童中中高强度体力活动(MVPA)、高强度体力活动(VPA)、久坐时间与肥胖之间的关系。
本研究样本包括 6539 名 9-11 岁儿童。使用加速度计评估 MVPA、VPA 和久坐行为的时间。根据世界卫生组织参考数据的 z 分数(>+2SD),将体重指数(BMI;kg·m)用于肥胖分类。
MVPA、VPA 和久坐行为的平均(SD)时间分别为 60(25)min·d、18(11)min·d 和 513(69)min·d。整个样本中肥胖的比例从各地点的 5.2%到 24.6%不等。MVPA(0.49;95%CI,0.44-0.55)、VPA(0.41;0.37-0.46)和久坐时间(1.19;1.08-1.30)与肥胖的比值比在整个样本中均有统计学意义。MVPA 和 VPA 与肥胖的相关性在 12 个地点均有统计学意义,而久坐时间与肥胖的相关性在 12 个地点中有 5 个有统计学意义。在相互调整模型中,MVPA 三分位组间 BMI z 分数差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),而久坐时间三分位组间无统计学意义。肥胖的受试者工作特征曲线分析结果表明,MVPA(曲线下面积[AUC],0.64)、VPA(AUC,0.67)和久坐行为(AUC,0.57)的最佳阈值分别为 55(95%CI,50-64)min·d、14(11-16)min·d 和 482(455-535)min·d。
MVPA 和 VPA 增加均与久坐行为无关,肥胖风险降低相关。久坐时间与肥胖呈正相关,但与 MVPA 无关。在这个多国家儿童样本中,MVPA 达到至少 55min·d 与肥胖的发生呈负相关,这支持了目前的指南。