Toan Nguyen T, Rossi Stefania, Prisco Gabriella, Nante Nicola, Viviani Simonetta
Clinical Research Unit, Pasteur Institute, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Trop Med Int Health. 2015 Jul;20(7):840-63. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12498. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
Dengue fever is globally considered underestimated. This study provides expansion factors (EFs) for dengue endemic selected countries and highlights critical issues in the use of EFs.
We identified dengue epidemiological cohort studies from 2000 to July 2013 through a literature search using PubMed, Web of Science and Lilacs (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Database), pre-defined keywords and inclusion/exclusion criteria, and included Brazil, Colombia, Nicaragua, Peru, Puerto Rico, Venezuela, Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Vietnam. Dengue national and local passive surveillance data were derived from WHO regional websites, PAHO, SEARO and WPRO. EFs were calculated as CI cohort studies/CI passive data for both national and local levels.
Cohort studies differed in case definition, laboratory test used and surveillance methods. The information on SEARO, PAHO and WPRO websites differed in terms of dengue epidemiological variables, population denominators and completeness. The highest incidence was reported by PAHO countries followed by WPRO and SEARO countries. EFs may vary for the different variables and denominators used for calculation. EFs were the highest in SEARO countries and lowest in PAHO countries. A trend for lower local EFs was observed.
The use of EFs for quantifying dengue underreporting may be problematic due to lack of uniformity in reporting dengue both active and passive surveillance data. Quality dengue surveillance data are urgently needed for a better estimate of dengue disease burden and to measure the impact of preventive intervention.
登革热在全球范围内被认为是未得到充分重视的。本研究提供了登革热流行国家的扩展因子(EFs),并强调了使用扩展因子时的关键问题。
我们通过使用PubMed、科学网和Lilacs(拉丁美洲和加勒比卫生科学数据库)进行文献检索,利用预定义的关键词和纳入/排除标准,确定了2000年至2013年7月的登革热流行病学队列研究,研究对象包括巴西、哥伦比亚、尼加拉瓜、秘鲁、波多黎各、委内瑞拉、孟加拉国、柬埔寨、印度、印度尼西亚、菲律宾、新加坡、斯里兰卡、泰国和越南。登革热国家和地方被动监测数据来自世界卫生组织区域网站、泛美卫生组织、东南亚区域办事处和西太平洋区域办事处。扩展因子计算为国家和地方层面队列研究的发病率置信区间/被动数据的发病率置信区间。
队列研究在病例定义、所使用的实验室检测和监测方法方面存在差异。东南亚区域办事处、泛美卫生组织和西太平洋区域办事处网站上的信息在登革热流行病学变量、人口分母和完整性方面存在差异。泛美卫生组织国家报告的发病率最高,其次是西太平洋区域办事处和东南亚区域办事处国家。扩展因子可能因用于计算的不同变量和分母而有所不同。扩展因子在东南亚区域办事处国家最高,在泛美卫生组织国家最低。观察到地方扩展因子较低的趋势。
由于主动和被动监测数据在登革热报告方面缺乏一致性,使用扩展因子来量化登革热报告不足可能存在问题。迫切需要高质量的登革热监测数据,以便更好地估计登革热疾病负担并衡量预防干预措施的影响。