Suppr超能文献

场景选择性皮质区域中的空间频率处理

Spatial frequency processing in scene-selective cortical regions.

作者信息

Kauffmann Louise, Ramanoël Stephen, Guyader Nathalie, Chauvin Alan, Peyrin Carole

机构信息

Univ. Grenoble Alpes, LPNC, F-38040 Grenoble, France; CNRS, LPNC UMR 5105, F-38040 Grenoble, France.

Univ. Grenoble Alpes, LPNC, F-38040 Grenoble, France; CNRS, LPNC UMR 5105, F-38040 Grenoble, France; INSERM U836, GIN, F-38706 Grenoble, France.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2015 May 15;112:86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.058. Epub 2015 Mar 6.

Abstract

Visual analysis begins with the parallel extraction of different attributes at different spatial frequencies. Low spatial frequencies (LSF) convey coarse information and are characterized by high luminance contrast, while high spatial frequencies (HSF) convey fine details and are characterized by low luminance contrast. In the present fMRI study, we examined how scene-selective regions-the parahippocampal place area (PPA), the retrosplenial cortex (RSC) and the occipital place area (OPA)-responded to spatial frequencies when contrast was either equalized or not equalized across spatial frequencies. Participants performed a categorization task on LSF, HSF and non-filtered scenes belonging to two different categories (indoors and outdoors). We either left contrast across scenes untouched, or equalized it using a root-mean-square contrast normalization. We found that when contrast remained unmodified, LSF and NF scenes elicited greater activation than HSF scenes in the PPA. However, when contrast was equalized across spatial frequencies, the PPA was selective to HFS. This suggests that PPA activity relies on an interaction between spatial frequency and contrast in scenes. In the RSC, LSF and NF elicited greater response than HSF scenes when contrast was not modified, while no effect of spatial frequencies appeared when contrast was equalized across filtered scenes, suggesting that the RSC is sensitive to high-contrast information. Finally, we observed selective activation of the OPA in response to HSF, irrespective of contrast manipulation. These results provide new insights into how scene-selective areas operate during scene processing.

摘要

视觉分析始于在不同空间频率下并行提取不同属性。低空间频率(LSF)传达粗略信息,其特征是高亮度对比度,而高空间频率(HSF)传达精细细节,其特征是低亮度对比度。在本功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究中,我们研究了场景选择区域——海马旁回位置区(PPA)、 retrosplenial皮质(RSC)和枕叶位置区(OPA)——在空间频率对比度相等或不相等时对空间频率的反应。参与者对属于两个不同类别(室内和室外)的低空间频率、高空间频率和未过滤场景执行分类任务。我们要么保持场景间的对比度不变,要么使用均方根对比度归一化来使其相等。我们发现,当对比度保持不变时,低空间频率和未过滤场景在海马旁回位置区引发的激活比高空间频率场景更大。然而,当空间频率的对比度相等时,海马旁回位置区对高空间频率有选择性。这表明海马旁回位置区的活动依赖于场景中空间频率和对比度之间的相互作用。在 retrosplenial皮质中,当对比度未改变时,低空间频率和未过滤场景比高空间频率场景引发更大的反应,而当过滤场景间的对比度相等时,未出现空间频率的影响,这表明 retrosplenial皮质对高对比度信息敏感。最后,我们观察到枕叶位置区对高空间频率有选择性激活,而与对比度操作无关。这些结果为场景选择区域在场景处理过程中的运作方式提供了新见解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验