Clifford Dawn, Ozier Amy, Bundros Joanna, Moore Jeffrey, Kreiser Anna, Morris Michelle Neyman
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, California State University, Chico, Chico, CA.
Family, Consumer & Nutrition Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015 Mar-Apr;47(2):143-55.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.12.002.
To determine the overall effect of non-diet, weight-neutral interventions on factors such as weight, biochemical measures, food and activity behavior, body image, and mental health.
Systematic review of intervention literature.
Group classes in community and worksite settings (14 studies), and individual counseling (1) and online education (1) in college settings.
Eighteen research articles (representing 16 studies) evaluating non-diet interventions using quasi-experimental and randomized study designs with either a comparison or control group.
Anthropometric, physiological, psychological, and dietary intake.
Systematic search of 168 articles and review of 18 articles meeting inclusionary criteria.
Non-diet interventions resulted in statistically significant improvements in disordered eating patterns, self-esteem, and depression. None of the interventions resulted in significant weight gain or worsening of blood pressure, blood glucose, or cholesterol, and in 2 studies biochemical measures improved significantly compared with the control or diet group. Primary limitations were inconsistent definitions of non-diet approaches and the use of different assessment instruments for measuring outcomes.
Because of the long-term ineffectiveness of weight-focused interventions, the psychological improvements seen in weight-neutral, non-diet interventions warrant further investigation.
确定非节食、体重中性干预措施对体重、生化指标、饮食和活动行为、身体形象及心理健康等因素的总体影响。
对干预文献进行系统综述。
社区和工作场所的团体课程(14项研究),以及大学环境中的个体咨询(1项)和在线教育(1项)。
18篇研究文章(代表16项研究),使用准实验和随机研究设计,设有比较组或对照组,评估非节食干预措施。
人体测量学、生理学、心理学和饮食摄入量。
系统检索168篇文章,并对符合纳入标准的18篇文章进行综述。
非节食干预措施在饮食失调模式、自尊和抑郁方面有统计学意义上的显著改善。没有一项干预措施导致体重显著增加或血压、血糖或胆固醇恶化,在2项研究中,与对照组或节食组相比,生化指标有显著改善。主要局限性在于非节食方法的定义不一致,以及使用不同的评估工具来测量结果。
由于以体重为重点的干预措施长期无效,体重中性、非节食干预措施中观察到的心理改善值得进一步研究。