Varghese Joy, Sachan Deepti, Reddy Mettu S, Cherian Tom, Jothimani Dinesh, Venugopal Kota, Arikichenin Olithselvan, Perumalla Rajasekar, Narasimhan Gomathy, Shanmugam Vivekananthan, Vijaya Srinivasan, Venkataraman Jayanthi, Rela Mohamed
Department of Hepatology & Liver Transplantation, Institute of Liver Diseases & Transplantation, Global Hospitals & Health City, Chennai, India.
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Global Hospitals & Health City, Chennai, India.
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2014 Sep;4(3):209-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
Prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleoside analogs can prevent hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplant (LT).
To determine the efficacy and cost of maintaining immunoprophylaxis with HBIG and hyperimmune plasma (HIP) for 6 months after LT.
MATERIAL & METHODS: The study included 22 HBV related LT recipients who were on entecavir and either HBIG or HIP for 6 months. Post transplant HBIG or HIP dose and cost incurred towards prophylaxis were noted. The cost of 200 IU of HBIG at the time of study was Rs 8250/- (US Dollars 135) and that of 2000 IU of HIP was Rs 8000/- (USD 130.7). The loading and maintenance costs at end of 6 months were compared between the two groups. Response to HBIG and HIP was assessed by checking for HBsAg reactivity, anti HBs titer response and HBV DNA viral load.
Median and range, Kruskal Wallis (KW) sign rank Sum Test and Correlation Coefficient (r2) was used for analysis.
Thirteen recipients received HBIG and 9 recipients HIP. The anti HBs response to HIP was significantly high compared to HBIG (KW Sign rank Sum test P < 0.05); titers remained high until the study period. Between 8 and 30 days, the titer achieved by both HBIG and HIP was similar (KW Sign rank Sum test not significant). Despite low anti HBs titer of <100 IU/L, none of the recipients on HBIG had HBsAg reactivity while 3 on HIP had transient HBsAg positivity. The total cost with HBIG was 13.9 times the cost of HIP.
HIP immunoprophylaxis in combination with entecavir achieves a high anti HBs titer at a significant low cost during anhepatic and loading phase. HBV reactivation rates with HBIG and HIP is low despite low anti HBs titer.
使用乙肝免疫球蛋白(HBIG)和核苷类似物进行预防可防止肝移植(LT)后乙肝病毒(HBV)复发。
确定肝移植后使用HBIG和高效价免疫血浆(HIP)进行6个月免疫预防的疗效和成本。
该研究纳入了22例接受恩替卡韦治疗且使用HBIG或HIP进行6个月治疗的HBV相关肝移植受者。记录移植后HBIG或HIP的剂量以及预防所产生的成本。研究时200 IU HBIG的成本为8250卢比(135美元),2000 IU HIP的成本为8000卢比(130.7美元)。比较两组在6个月末的负荷成本和维持成本。通过检测HBsAg反应性、抗HBs滴度反应和HBV DNA病毒载量来评估对HBIG和HIP的反应。
采用中位数和范围、Kruskal Wallis(KW)符号秩和检验以及相关系数(r2)进行分析。
13例受者接受HBIG治疗,9例受者接受HIP治疗。与HBIG相比,HIP的抗HBs反应显著更高(KW符号秩和检验P<0.05);滴度在研究期间一直保持较高水平。在8至30天之间,HBIG和HIP所达到的滴度相似(KW符号秩和检验无显著性差异)。尽管抗HBs滴度<100 IU/L较低,但接受HBIG治疗的受者均无HBsAg反应性,而接受HIP治疗的有3例出现短暂的HBsAg阳性。HBIG的总成本是HIP成本的13.9倍。
在无肝期和负荷期,HIP免疫预防联合恩替卡韦可在显著低成本的情况下实现高抗HBs滴度。尽管抗HBs滴度较低,但HBIG和HIP的HBV再激活率较低。