• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜括约肌切开术联合大球囊扩张术与单纯内镜括约肌切开术治疗胆管结石的系统评价和Meta分析

Endoscopic sphincterotomy with large balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Xu Lei, Kyaw Moe Htet, Tse Yee Kit, Lau James Yun Wong

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo No. 1 Hospital, Ningbo 315010, China.

Institute of Digestive Diseases, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:673103. doi: 10.1155/2015/673103. Epub 2015 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1155/2015/673103
PMID:25756050
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4338384/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The safety and efficacy of endoscopic sphincterotomy with large balloon dilation (EPLBD) are unclear. This study compares the safety and efficacy between EPLBD and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Literatures were searched for randomized controlled trials in PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Outcome measurements included adverse events; stone removal rate; requirement of mechanical lithotripsy.

RESULTS

Four RCTs with a total of 596 patients were included. Three RCTs compared EPLBD versus EST alone for stone removal; one RCT compared EPLBD versus EST plus mechanical lithotripsy for stone removal. Pooled data from three RCTs showed that there was no significant difference in the adverse event of ERCP. A significantly higher cholangitis rate was seen in patients who received EST plus mechanical lithotripsy, compared to those treated with EPLBD (13.3% versus 0.0, P = 0.026). No statistical difference was found between EPLBD and EST for stone removal rate. Significant differences in requirement of mechanical lithotripsy were seen with removal of large stones (>15 mm), with EPLBD reducing the use of mechanical lithotripsy (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.54-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

EPLBD and EST have similar efficacy and safety for bile duct stones clearance. With larger stones, EPLBD can reduce requirement of mechanical lithotripsy.

摘要

未标注

内镜下括约肌切开术联合大球囊扩张术（EPLBD）的安全性和有效性尚不清楚。本研究比较了EPLBD与内镜下括约肌切开术（EST）的安全性和有效性。

患者与方法

在PUBMED、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆中检索随机对照试验的文献。观察指标包括不良事件、结石清除率、机械碎石的需求。

结果

纳入4项随机对照试验，共596例患者。3项随机对照试验比较了EPLBD与单纯EST清除结石的效果；1项随机对照试验比较了EPLBD与EST联合机械碎石清除结石的效果。三项随机对照试验的汇总数据显示，ERCP的不良事件无显著差异。与接受EPLBD治疗的患者相比，接受EST联合机械碎石治疗的患者胆管炎发生率显著更高（13.3%对0.0，P = 0.026）。EPLBD与EST在结石清除率方面无统计学差异。在清除大结石（>15mm）时，机械碎石的需求存在显著差异，EPLBD减少了机械碎石的使用（RR：0.73；95%CI：0.54 - 0.99）。

结论

EPLBD和EST在清除胆管结石方面具有相似的疗效和安全性。对于较大的结石，EPLBD可以减少机械碎石的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba24/4338384/dbaaea4c3c5b/BMRI2015-673103.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba24/4338384/acd0ff54502b/BMRI2015-673103.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba24/4338384/9cddd8120e91/BMRI2015-673103.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba24/4338384/d8c39e0fe087/BMRI2015-673103.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba24/4338384/02d27ed1ddb2/BMRI2015-673103.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba24/4338384/63520d568c80/BMRI2015-673103.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba24/4338384/01b0a12271da/BMRI2015-673103.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba24/4338384/dbaaea4c3c5b/BMRI2015-673103.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba24/4338384/acd0ff54502b/BMRI2015-673103.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba24/4338384/9cddd8120e91/BMRI2015-673103.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba24/4338384/d8c39e0fe087/BMRI2015-673103.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba24/4338384/02d27ed1ddb2/BMRI2015-673103.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba24/4338384/63520d568c80/BMRI2015-673103.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba24/4338384/01b0a12271da/BMRI2015-673103.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba24/4338384/dbaaea4c3c5b/BMRI2015-673103.007.jpg

相似文献

1
Endoscopic sphincterotomy with large balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜括约肌切开术联合大球囊扩张术与单纯内镜括约肌切开术治疗胆管结石的系统评价和Meta分析
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:673103. doi: 10.1155/2015/673103. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
2
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Three Endoscopic Methods to Manage Large Common Bile Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.三种内镜方法治疗胆总管大结石疗效与安全性的比较：系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Apr;31(4):443-454. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0511. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
3
Endoscopic Treatment of Large Bile Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.内镜治疗胆总管大结石：系统评价与网状Meta分析
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jan;21(1):33-44.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
4
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 3(9):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub3.
5
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 12;2013(12):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub4.
6
Laparoscopic-endoscopic rendezvous versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in people undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for stones in the gallbladder and bile duct.腹腔镜 - 内镜会师术与术前内镜括约肌切开术治疗胆囊和胆管结石行腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 11;4(4):CD010507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010507.pub2.
7
Endoscopic balloon sphincter dilation (sphincteroplasty) versus sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones.内镜下球囊括约肌扩张术（括约肌成形术）与括约肌切开术治疗胆总管结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;2006(4):CD004890. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004890.pub2.
8
Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经内镜乳头大球囊扩张与内镜括约肌切开术治疗胆总管结石的比较：一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jun;47(6):655-63. doi: 10.1007/s00535-012-0528-9. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
9
Comparative Success Rate and Adverse Effects of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Versus Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation in Large Common Bile Duct Stones Removal. A Propensity Scores Inverse Weighting Analysis.内镜括约肌切开术与内镜乳头大球囊扩张术在取出胆总管大结石方面的比较成功率及不良反应。倾向评分逆加权分析
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Feb;40(2):510-519. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16825. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
10
Endoscopic sphincterotomy for adults with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.成人胆胰管壶腹括约肌功能障碍的内镜下括约肌切开术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 22;3(3):CD014944. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014944.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors for stone recurrence after a successful common bile duct surgical exploration for choledocholithiasis.胆总管结石取石术后结石复发的预测因素。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Jun;407(4):1545-1552. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02577-7. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
2
Best practices for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.预防内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎的最佳实践
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jun 16;13(6):161-169. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i6.161.
3
Dilation assisted stone extraction for complex biliary lithiasis: Technical aspects and practical principles.

本文引用的文献

1
Recent advances in endoscopic management of difficult bile duct stones.内镜治疗复杂胆管结石的最新进展。
Dig Endosc. 2013 Jul;25(4):376-85. doi: 10.1111/den.12118. Epub 2013 May 8.
2
Randomized trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy with balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy alone for removal of bile duct stones.内镜下括约肌切开术联合球囊扩张与单纯内镜下括约肌切开术治疗胆管结石的随机对照试验。
Gastroenterology. 2013 Feb;144(2):341-345.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.027. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
3
Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
扩张辅助下复杂胆石症的取石术：技术要点与实用原则
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Feb 16;13(2):33-44. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i2.33.
4
Best Procedure for the Management of Common Bile Duct Stones via the Papilla: Literature Review and Analysis of Procedural Efficacy and Safety.经乳头处理胆总管结石的最佳方法：文献综述及手术疗效与安全性分析
J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 25;9(12):3808. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123808.
5
Long-term Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillary Large-balloon Dilation for Common Bile Duct Stones.内镜下乳头大球囊扩张术治疗胆总管结石的长期疗效
Intern Med. 2020 Apr 1;59(7):891-899. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3881-19. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
6
Single-Operator Wire-Guided Cannulation Technique for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影的单操作导丝引导插管技术。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Aug 25;25:6391-6396. doi: 10.12659/MSM.916007.
7
Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation decreases the risk of bleeding in cirrhotic patients compared with endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: A national population-based study.与内镜下胆管括约肌切开术相比，内镜下乳头球囊扩张术可降低肝硬化患者出血风险：一项基于全国人群的研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(30):e16529. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016529.
8
Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.内镜括约肌切开术与内镜括约肌切开术联合球囊扩张术治疗胆管结石的比较：基于随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Aug 16;10(8):130-144. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i8.130.
9
Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation with sphincterotomy is safe and effective for biliary stone removal independent of timing and size of sphincterotomy.内镜下乳头大球囊扩张联合括约肌切开术是安全有效的胆道取石方法，与括约肌切开的时机和大小无关。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Dec 28;23(48):8597-8604. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i48.8597.
10
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the removal of bile duct stones: Data from a "real-life" multicenter study on Dilation-Assisted Stone Extraction.内镜下乳头球囊扩张术治疗胆管结石的疗效与安全性：来自一项关于扩张辅助结石取出术的“真实世界”多中心研究的数据。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Oct 16;8(18):646-652. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i18.646.
经内镜乳头大球囊扩张与内镜括约肌切开术治疗胆总管结石的比较：一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jun;47(6):655-63. doi: 10.1007/s00535-012-0528-9. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
4
Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment for choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis.内镜乳头球囊扩张与内镜括约肌切开术治疗胆总管结石的疗效比较：一项荟萃分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Mar;27(3):464-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06912.x.
5
Can a small endoscopic sphincterotomy plus a large-balloon dilation reduce the use of mechanical lithotripsy in patients with large bile duct stones?小内镜下括约肌切开术联合大球囊扩张能否减少大胆管结石患者机械碎石的应用？
Surg Endosc. 2011 Oct;25(10):3330-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1720-3. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
6
Large balloon dilation vs. mechanical lithotripsy for the management of large bile duct stones: a prospective randomized study.大球囊扩张与机械碎石术治疗胆总管大结石：前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb;106(2):278-85. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.421. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
7
Randomized trial of 1-minute versus 5-minute endoscopic balloon dilation for extraction of bile duct stones.随机试验：1 分钟内镜球囊扩张术与 5 分钟内镜球囊扩张术治疗胆管结石的比较。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Dec;72(6):1154-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.009. Epub 2010 Sep 25.
8
Small sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation versus sphincterotomy.小括约肌切开术联合内镜乳头大球囊扩张术与括约肌切开术的比较
World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Sep 14;15(34):4298-304. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.4298.
9
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.用于报告评估卫生保健干预措施的研究的系统评价和荟萃分析的PRISMA声明：解释与详述
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):e1-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
10
Endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with large balloon dilation can reduce the procedure time and fluoroscopy time for removal of large bile duct stones.内镜括约肌切开术联合大球囊扩张术可减少取出胆总管大结石的手术时间和透视时间。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):560-5. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.67. Epub 2009 Jan 27.