Le Bec Jimmy, Courbaud Benoit, Le Moguédec Gilles, Pélissier Raphaël
IRD, UMR AMAP, Montpellier, France; AgroParisTech, Paris, France.
IRSTEA, UR EM, Saint-Martin-d'Hères, France.
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 10;10(3):e0117028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117028. eCollection 2015.
Understanding how tropical tree species differ in their growth strategies is critical to predict forest dynamics and assess species coexistence. Although tree growth is highly variable in tropical forests, species maximum growth is often considered as a major axis synthesizing species strategies, with fast-growing pioneer and slow-growing shade tolerant species as emblematic representatives. We used a hierarchical linear mixed model and 21-years long tree diameter increment series in a monsoon forest of the Western Ghats, India, to characterize species growth strategies and question whether maximum growth summarizes these strategies. We quantified both species responses to biotic and abiotic factors and individual tree effects unexplained by these factors. Growth responses to competition and tree size appeared highly variable among species which led to reversals in performance ranking along those two gradients. However, species-specific responses largely overlapped due to large unexplained variability resulting mostly from inter-individual growth differences consistent over time. On average one-third of the variability captured by our model was explained by covariates. This emphasizes the high dimensionality of the tree growth process, i.e. the fact that trees differ in many dimensions (genetics, life history) influencing their growth response to environmental gradients, some being unmeasured or unmeasurable. In addition, intraspecific variability increased as a power function of species maximum growth partly as a result of higher absolute responses of fast-growing species to competition and tree size. However, covariates explained on average the same proportion of intraspecific variability for slow- and fast-growing species, which showed the same range of relative responses to competition and tree size. These results reflect a scale invariance of the growth process, underlining that slow- and fast-growing species exhibit the same range of growth strategies.
了解热带树种的生长策略差异对于预测森林动态和评估物种共存至关重要。尽管热带森林中树木生长高度可变,但物种的最大生长量通常被视为综合物种策略的一个主要轴,快速生长的先锋树种和耐荫的慢速生长树种是典型代表。我们使用分层线性混合模型和印度西高止山脉季风林中长达21年的树木直径增量序列,来表征物种的生长策略,并质疑最大生长量是否概括了这些策略。我们量化了物种对生物和非生物因素的响应以及这些因素无法解释的个体树木效应。物种对竞争和树木大小的生长响应在不同物种间差异很大,这导致了沿这两个梯度的表现排名出现逆转。然而,由于主要由个体间长期一致的生长差异导致的大量无法解释的变异性,物种特异性响应在很大程度上重叠。我们的模型所捕获的变异性平均有三分之一可由协变量解释。这强调了树木生长过程的高维度性,即树木在许多影响其对环境梯度生长响应的维度(遗传学、生活史)上存在差异,其中一些是未测量或无法测量的。此外,种内变异性随着物种最大生长量的幂函数增加,部分原因是快速生长物种对竞争和树木大小的绝对响应更高。然而,协变量平均解释了慢速和快速生长物种种内变异性的相同比例,这表明它们对竞争和树木大小的相对响应范围相同。这些结果反映了生长过程的尺度不变性,强调慢速和快速生长的物种表现出相同范围的生长策略。