Martin Jeffrey S, Friedenreich Zachary D, Borges Alexandra R, Roberts Michael D
1Department of Biomedical Sciences, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, Connecticut; 2Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine-Auburn Campus, Auburn, Alabama; and 3School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Oct;29(10):2900-6. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000928.
External pneumatic compression (EPC) use in athletics is increasing. However, there is a paucity of evidence supporting the effectiveness of EPC in aiding recovery and performance. We sought to determine the efficacy of EPC for acute recovery of anaerobic power and lactate clearance following a fatigue protocol. Fourteen (n = 14; women = 7 and men = 7), apparently healthy, active subjects (aged 22.73 ± 4.05 years) were enrolled in this randomized crossover design study. After familiarization sessions, subjects completed 2 study trials separated by 3-7 days. Trials consisted of a fatigue protocol (two 30-second Wingate anaerobic tests (WAnTs) on a cycle ergometer separated by 3 minutes of rest), 30 minutes of treatment with EPC or sham, and, finally, a single 30-second WAnT. A peristaltic pulse EPC device was used with target inflation pressures of ∼70 mm Hg applied to the lower limbs. Peak power (PkP), average power (AP), and the fatigue index (FI) were recorded for each WAnT. Moreover, blood lactate concentration (BLa) was evaluated at baseline and at regular intervals during recovery (5, 15, 25, and 35 minutes postfatigue protocol). No significant differences in PkP, AP, and FI were observed. However, BLa was significantly lower at 25 and 35 minutes of recovery (8.91 ± 3.12 vs. 10.66 ± 3.44 mmol·L(-1) [p = 0.021] and 6.44 ± 2.14 vs. 7.89 ± 2.37 mmol·L(-1) [p = 0.006] for EPC vs. sham, respectively). Application of EPC during recovery may be a viable alternative when "inactive" recovery is desirable.
在体育运动中,外部气动压缩(EPC)的使用正在增加。然而,缺乏证据支持EPC在辅助恢复和提高运动表现方面的有效性。我们试图确定EPC对疲劳方案后无氧功率急性恢复和乳酸清除的疗效。14名(n = 14;女性 = 7名,男性 = 7名)明显健康、活跃的受试者(年龄22.73 ± 4.05岁)参与了这项随机交叉设计研究。在熟悉阶段后,受试者完成了两项间隔3 - 7天的研究试验。试验包括一个疲劳方案(在自行车测力计上进行两次30秒的温盖特无氧测试(WAnT),中间休息3分钟)、30分钟的EPC或假治疗,最后是一次30秒的WAnT。使用蠕动脉冲EPC设备,将约70毫米汞柱的目标充气压力施加于下肢。记录每次WAnT的峰值功率(PkP)、平均功率(AP)和疲劳指数(FI)。此外,在基线以及恢复期间(疲劳方案后5、15、25和35分钟)定期评估血乳酸浓度(BLa)。未观察到PkP、AP和FI有显著差异。然而,在恢复的25分钟和35分钟时,EPC组的BLa显著低于假治疗组(分别为8.91 ± 3.12 mmol·L(-1) 对比10.66 ± 3.44 mmol·L(-1) [p = 0.021] 和6.44 ± 2.14 mmol·L(-1) 对比7.89 ± 2.37 mmol·L(-1) [p = 0.006])。当需要“被动”恢复时,恢复期间应用EPC可能是一种可行的选择。