Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Apr;36(4):581-7. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000716.
To evaluate the efficacy of tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT), especially in patients who did not revisit the clinic after starting the program, and to determine the current status of patients who were lost to follow-up.
Telephone survey.
Tertiary referral center.
Forty-seven patients enrolled in a TRT program at Seoul National University Hospital. Twenty-four patients who regularly visited the clinic were deemed the good follow-up (GF) group, and 23 patients who did not return after the initial counseling were deemed the follow-up loss (FL) group.
Post-TRT questionnaires with the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and a tinnitus visual analog scale (VAS), performed with a telephone survey.
TRT efficacy, evaluated via the THI, and tinnitus VAS scores. A questionnaire on reasons for non-attendance after TRT was used.
Pre-TRT VAS and THI scores showed no significant difference between groups. After TRT, both groups showed significant decreases in tinnitus VAS and THI scores. Post-TRT VAS scores for awareness, effects on daily life, and post-TRT THI scores were significantly lower in the FL group.
Treatment outcomes were better in the FL group than in the GF group in several parameters. The FL group was greatly influenced by the first TRT counseling and obtained sufficient relief that they no longer felt the need for additional treatment. Treatment outcomes in patients lost to follow-up may not be as bad as presumed.
评估耳鸣再训练疗法(TRT)的疗效,尤其是在开始治疗后未复诊的患者中,并确定失访患者的现状。
电话调查。
三级转诊中心。
47 名在首尔国立大学医院参加 TRT 项目的患者。24 名定期就诊的患者被视为良好随访(GF)组,23 名初始咨询后未返回的患者被视为随访丢失(FL)组。
通过电话调查进行 TRT 后的问卷调查,包括耳鸣残疾量表(THI)和耳鸣视觉模拟量表(VAS)。
通过 THI 和耳鸣 VAS 评分评估 TRT 疗效。使用问卷了解 TRT 后未就诊的原因。
治疗前 VAS 和 THI 评分在两组之间无显著差异。TRT 后,两组的耳鸣 VAS 和 THI 评分均显著降低。FL 组在治疗后对意识、日常生活影响和治疗后 THI 评分的 VAS 评分显著较低。
在几个参数中,FL 组的治疗效果优于 GF 组。FL 组受首次 TRT 咨询的影响较大,并获得了足够的缓解,因此不再需要额外的治疗。失访患者的治疗效果可能并不像预期的那么差。