Sveaas S H, Berg I J, Provan S A, Semb A G, Olsen I C, Ueland T, Aukrust P, Vøllestad N, Hagen K B, Kvien T K, Dagfinrud H
National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital , Oslo , Norway.
Scand J Rheumatol. 2015;44(2):118-24. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2014.956142.
Insight into the most important inflammatory pathways in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) could be of importance in risk stratification and the development of treatment strategies. Therefore, we aimed to compare circulating levels of inflammatory biomarkers between AS patients and controls, and explore associations between these biomarkers and clinical measures of disease activity.
In a cross-sectional study, 143 AS patients were compared with 124 population controls. Blood samples were analysed by immunoassays for interleukin (IL)-6, IL-17a, IL-23, soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNF-R1) and 2 (sTNF-R2), and osteoprotegerin (OPG). Disease activity was measured by the AS Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) and the Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).
Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) demonstrated elevated plasma levels of sTNF-R1 [geometrical mean 0.94 (95% CI 0.88-1.00) vs. 0.83 (95% CI 0.78-0.89) ng/mL, p < 0.01] and OPG (2.3, 95% CI 2.1-2.4 vs. 2.0, 95% CI 1.9-2.2 ng/mL, p = 0.02) and, although not significant, of IL-23 (122, 95% CI 108-139 vs. 106, 95% CI 93-120 pg/mL, p = 0.07) in AS patients vs.
More AS patients had a high level of sTNF-R2 than controls (22 vs. 1, p < 0.01). No differences between the groups were seen for IL-6 and IL-17a. In patients, no significant associations were seen between inflammatory markers and disease activity measures after adjusting for personal characteristics.
Significantly higher plasma levels of sTNF-R1, sTNF-R2, and OPG and numerically but non-significantly higher levels of IL-23 were found in AS patients compared to controls, indicating that these cytokines and cytokine receptors are important inflammatory pathways. Clinical measures of disease activity were not significantly correlated with circulating inflammatory markers.
深入了解强直性脊柱炎(AS)中最重要的炎症途径对于风险分层和治疗策略的制定可能具有重要意义。因此,我们旨在比较AS患者与对照组之间循环炎症生物标志物的水平,并探讨这些生物标志物与疾病活动临床指标之间的关联。
在一项横断面研究中,将143例AS患者与124名人群对照进行比较。通过免疫测定法分析血样中的白细胞介素(IL)-6、IL-17a、IL-23、可溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体1(sTNF-R1)和2(sTNF-R2)以及骨保护素(OPG)。通过AS疾病活动评分(ASDAS)和巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(BASDAI)来测量疾病活动度。
协方差分析(ANCOVA)显示,AS患者血浆中sTNF-R1水平升高[几何平均数0.94(95%可信区间0.88 - 1.00)对0.83(95%可信区间0.78 - 0.89)ng/mL,p < 0.01]以及OPG水平升高(2.3,95%可信区间2.1 - 2.4对2.0,95%可信区间1.9 - 2.2 ng/mL,p = 0.02),虽然IL-23水平升高不显著(122,95%可信区间108 - 139对106,95%可信区间93 - 120 pg/mL)。
AS患者中sTNF-R2高水平的人数多于对照组(22对1,p < 0.01)。IL-6和IL-17a在两组之间未见差异。在患者中,调整个人特征后,炎症标志物与疾病活动度指标之间未见显著关联。
与对照组相比,AS患者血浆中sTNF-R1、sTNF-R2和OPG水平显著升高,IL-23水平虽数值上升高但不显著,表明这些细胞因子和细胞因子受体是重要的炎症途径。疾病活动的临床指标与循环炎症标志物无显著相关性。