• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胫骨干骺端骨折髓内钉固定后的结果

Outcomes After Intramedullary Nailing of Distal Tibial Fractures.

作者信息

Kruppa Christiane G, Hoffmann Martin F, Sietsema Debra L, Mulder Michelle B, Jones Clifford B

机构信息

*Grand Rapids Medical Education Partners, Grand Rapids, MI; †Department of Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany; ‡College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI; §Orthopaedic Associates of Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI; and ‖School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Sep;29(9):e309-15. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000323.

DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000323
PMID:25756912
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine outcomes in the treatment of distal tibial fractures treated with intramedullary nails.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Level I trauma center with follow-up in a private orthopaedic practice.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Radiographic determination of alignment, nonunion, and malunion, clinical outcome (range of motion, and implant-associated complaints), wound complications, and fibular fixation.

PATIENTS

A total of 105 patients with OTA/AO type A and C tibial fractures (<11 cm from the joint line) treated with intramedullary nailing.

RESULTS

Distance of the fracture from the joint line averaged 6.1 cm (range, 0-11). Mean follow-up was 25.6 months (range, 12-74). Nonunion occurred in 20 (19%) fractures and were significantly associated with open fractures (P = 0.012), wound complications (P < 0.001), and the need for fibular fixation (P = 0.007). Sagittal plane alignment averaged 2.5 degrees (±4.4) valgus. Malunion occurred in 25 (23.8%) fractures and again were significantly associated with open fractures (P = 0.045). Fifty (47.6%) patients had implant-related pain, which resolved in 27 (54.0%) after removal.

CONCLUSIONS

Intramedullary nailing of distal tibial fractures is a suitable treatment option. Acceptable alignment and range of motion can be achieved. Both nonunions and malunions were significantly associated with open fractures, wound complications, and fibular fixation. Implant removal was needed in 25% of cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

目的

确定使用髓内钉治疗胫骨干骺端骨折的疗效。

设计

回顾性分析。

地点

一级创伤中心,在一家私立骨科诊所进行随访。

主要观察指标

通过影像学确定对线、骨不连和畸形愈合情况,临床疗效(活动范围和与植入物相关的主诉)、伤口并发症以及腓骨固定情况。

患者

总共105例接受髓内钉治疗的OTA/AO A型和C型胫骨干骺端骨折(距关节线<11 cm)患者。

结果

骨折部位距关节线的平均距离为6.1 cm(范围0 - 11 cm)。平均随访时间为25.6个月(范围12 - 74个月)。20例(19%)骨折发生骨不连,并与开放性骨折(P = 0.012)、伤口并发症(P < 0.001)以及腓骨固定需求(P = 0.007)显著相关。矢状面平均对线为外翻2.5°(±4.4°)。25例(23.8%)骨折发生畸形愈合,同样与开放性骨折显著相关(P = 0.045)。50例(47.6%)患者有与植入物相关的疼痛,其中27例(54.0%)在取出植入物后疼痛缓解。

结论

胫骨干骺端骨折髓内钉固定是一种合适的治疗选择。可实现可接受的对线和活动范围。骨不连和畸形愈合均与开放性骨折、伤口并发症以及腓骨固定显著相关。25%的病例需要取出植入物。

证据级别

治疗性四级证据。有关证据级别的完整描述,请参阅《作者须知》。

相似文献

1
Outcomes After Intramedullary Nailing of Distal Tibial Fractures.胫骨干骺端骨折髓内钉固定后的结果
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Sep;29(9):e309-15. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000323.
2
Randomized, prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures.随机、前瞻性比较钢板与髓内钉固定治疗胫骨骨干远端骨折。
J Orthop Trauma. 2011 Dec;25(12):736-41. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318213f709.
3
Management of Distal Tibial Metaphyseal Fractures With the SIGN Intramedullary Nail in 3 Developing Countries.在三个发展中国家使用SIGN髓内钉治疗胫骨干骺端远端骨折
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Dec;29(12):e469-75. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000396.
4
Metaphyseal Distal Tibia Fractures: A Cohort, Single-Surgeon Study Comparing Outcomes of Patients Treated With Minimally Invasive Plating Versus Intramedullary Nailing.胫骨干骺端远端骨折:一项队列研究,单外科医生比较微创钢板治疗与髓内钉治疗患者的结果
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 May;30(5):e169-74. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000530.
5
Extreme Nailing: Is It Safe to Allow Immediate Weightbearing After Intramedullary Nail Fixation of Extra-articular Distal Tibial Fractures (OTA/AO 43-A)?极致钉固定术:关节外胫骨远端骨折(OTA/AO 43-A)髓内钉固定后即刻负重是否安全?
J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Aug;33(8):392-396. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001484.
6
Does fibular plating improve alignment after intramedullary nailing of distal metaphyseal tibia fractures?腓骨钢板固定能否改善胫骨干骺端远端骨折髓内钉固定后的对线情况?
J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Feb;20(2):94-103. doi: 10.1097/01.bot.0000199118.61229.70.
7
Radiographic and clinical comparisons of distal tibia shaft fractures (4 to 11 cm proximal to the plafond): plating versus intramedullary nailing.胫骨干远端骨折(距踝关节面近端4至11厘米)的影像学与临床比较:钢板固定与髓内钉固定
J Orthop Trauma. 2008 May-Jun;22(5):307-11. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31816ed974.
8
[Comparison of LCP and locked intramedullary nailing fixation in treatment of tibial diaphysis fractures].锁定加压钢板与带锁髓内钉固定治疗胫骨干骨折的比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Nov;21(11):1167-70.
9
Long-term follow-up of tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing.髓内钉治疗胫骨干骨折的长期随访
J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Sep;22(8):525-9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318180e646.
10
Comparison of intramedullary nail and plate fixation in distal tibia diaphyseal fractures close to the mortise.靠近踝关节的胫骨干远端骨折的髓内钉与钢板固定比较。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2014 May;20(3):189-93. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2014.92972.

引用本文的文献

1
Static versus dynamic intramedullary nailing for femoral and tibial shaft fractures: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial.股骨和胫骨干骨折的静态与动态髓内钉固定:一项双盲随机临床试验
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Mar 27;87(4):2006-2013. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003108. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Comparison of Radiographic Outcomes Assessed via the Radiographic Union Scale for Tibial Fractures and Alkaline Phosphatase Levels during the Tibial Healing Process: A Series of Case Reports.通过胫骨骨折影像学愈合量表评估的影像学结果与胫骨愈合过程中碱性磷酸酶水平的比较:系列病例报告
Biology (Basel). 2024 Jun 3;13(6):407. doi: 10.3390/biology13060407.
3
Risk factors for malunion of distal tibia fractures treated by intramedullary nailing.
髓内钉治疗胫骨远端骨折畸形愈合的危险因素。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jan 3;19(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04472-3.
4
Association of Fracture Location and Pattern With Nonunion or Malunion in Tibia Fractures Managed With Intramedullary Nailing: A Retrospective Study.髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折时骨折部位和类型与骨不连或骨畸形愈合的相关性:一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2023 Nov 21;15(11):e49156. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49156. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
Comparing Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis With Interlocking Intramedullary Nail Fixation for the Management of Adult Extra-Articular Distal Tibial Fractures: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.比较微创经皮钢板接骨术与带锁髓内钉固定治疗成人胫骨远端关节外骨折:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 21;15(11):e49214. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49214. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
Comparison of clinical and radiological results after a minimum one-year follow-up of tibial fractures operated via suprapatellar or infrapatellar intramedullary nailing: A retrospective study.经髌上或髌下入路髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折的临床和影像学结果的最少一年随访比较:一项回顾性研究。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023 Aug 21;34(3):679-686. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.1153.
7
Does the distal nail position impact the rates of misalignment and bone union in distal tibial fractures?远侧趾骨位置是否会影响胫骨远端骨折的对线不良和骨愈合率?
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Dec;33(8):3365-3371. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03566-2. Epub 2023 May 1.
8
A clinical comparative study of intramedullary nailing and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for extra-articular distal tibia fractures.髓内钉与微创钢板接骨术治疗胫骨远端关节外骨折的临床对比研究
Am J Transl Res. 2023 Mar 15;15(3):1996-2005. eCollection 2023.
9
Comparison of dynamic versus static fixation of intramedullary nailing in tibial diaphyseal fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.胫骨干骨折髓内钉动态与静态固定的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Jul 19;32:101941. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101941. eCollection 2022 Sep.
10
Reduction techniques for intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a comparative study.胫骨干骨折髓内钉固定的复位技术:一项对比研究
OTA Int. 2021 Feb 2;4(1):e095. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000095. eCollection 2021 Mar.