• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脐血无菌检测的验证:挑战与结果

Validation of sterility testing of cord blood: challenges and results.

作者信息

Ramirez-Arcos Sandra, Kou Yuntong, Yang Lin, Perkins Heather, Taha Mariam, Halpenny Mike, Elmoazzen Heidi

机构信息

Product and Process Development, Canadian Blood Services Centre for Innovation.

National Public Cord Blood Bank, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2015 Aug;55(8):1985-92. doi: 10.1111/trf.13050. Epub 2015 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1111/trf.13050
PMID:25757514
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sterility testing for cord blood (CB) products is mandatory to prevent transplantation-transmitted microbial infections. Here, the automated BacT/ALERT (bioMérieux) culture system was validated to detect microbial contamination in CB units processed at the Canadian National Public Cord Blood Bank.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A three-phase validation was developed. CB units were prepared with pentastarch (Phases 1 and 2) or hetastarch (Phase 3). In Phase 1, CB was spiked with approximately 100 colony-forming units/mL of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Bacteroides fragilis, and Candida albicans. Plasma (8 mL) and buffy coat (BC; 0.5 and 8 mL) were inoculated into culture bottles. In Phases 2 and 3, a mix of red blood cells (RBCs) and plasma (4 mL each) was used as the inoculant. In Phase 3, Aspergillus brasiliensis was added as a test organism and microbial concentrations in the by-product RBCs and plasma were determined. The BC fractions were cryopreserved and tested 3 months later.

RESULTS

In Phase 1, bacteria failed to grow in CB units containing antibiotics. Thus, antibiotic-free units were used for the other phases. C. albicans was not always captured in plasma, but using a mix of RBCs and plasma, all organisms were detected. The use of pentastarch or hetastarch did not affect microbial recovery. C. albicans and A. brasiliensis were preferentially recovered in RBCs and BC. Cryopreservation did not affect microbial survival during CB processing.

CONCLUSIONS

A mix of plasma and RBCs is appropriate for CB sterility testing. Interestingly, fungi preferentially segregate to cellular fractions. The clinical significance of the bactericidal /or bacteriostatic effect of antibiotics in CB merits further investigation.

摘要

背景

脐血(CB)产品的无菌检测对于预防移植传播的微生物感染至关重要。在此,对自动化BacT/ALERT(生物梅里埃公司)培养系统进行了验证,以检测在加拿大国家公共脐血库处理的CB单位中的微生物污染情况。

研究设计与方法

开展了一个分为三个阶段的验证过程。CB单位使用喷他淀粉(第1和第2阶段)或羟乙基淀粉(第3阶段)进行制备。在第1阶段,向CB中加入约100菌落形成单位/毫升的铜绿假单胞菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌、脆弱拟杆菌和白色念珠菌。将血浆(8毫升)和 Buffy 层(BC;0.5毫升和8毫升)接种到培养瓶中。在第2和第3阶段,使用红细胞(RBC)和血浆的混合物(各4毫升)作为接种物。在第3阶段,添加巴西曲霉作为测试微生物,并测定副产品RBC和血浆中的微生物浓度。BC部分进行冷冻保存,并在3个月后进行检测。

结果

在第1阶段,含有抗生素的CB单位中细菌未能生长。因此,其他阶段使用不含抗生素的单位。白色念珠菌并非总能在血浆中被检测到,但使用RBC和血浆的混合物时,所有微生物均能被检测到。喷他淀粉或羟乙基淀粉的使用不影响微生物的回收率。白色念珠菌和巴西曲霉在RBC和BC中优先被回收。冷冻保存不影响CB处理过程中微生物的存活情况。

结论

血浆和RBC的混合物适用于CB无菌检测。有趣的是,真菌优先分离到细胞部分。CB中抗生素的杀菌/或抑菌作用的临床意义值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Validation of sterility testing of cord blood: challenges and results.脐血无菌检测的验证:挑战与结果
Transfusion. 2015 Aug;55(8):1985-92. doi: 10.1111/trf.13050. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
2
Evaluation of the sterility testing process of hematopoietic stem cells at Canadian Blood Services.评估加拿大血液服务中心造血干细胞的无菌检测过程。
Transfusion. 2012 Aug;52(8):1778-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03530.x. Epub 2012 Feb 5.
3
Development of a proof of principle for universal neutralization of antibiotics in cord blood by-products used for sterility testing.
Transfusion. 2018 Jun;58(6):1421-1426. doi: 10.1111/trf.14567. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
4
Microbial screening of unrelated cord blood units in a Chinese cord blood bank.中国一家脐带血库中无关脐带血单位的微生物筛查
Transfus Med. 2013 Dec;23(6):438-41. doi: 10.1111/tme.12079. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
5
Microbial screening of UC blood units by an automated culture system: effect of delayed testing on bacterial detection.使用自动化培养系统对溃疡性结肠炎患者血液单位进行微生物筛查:延迟检测对细菌检测的影响。
Cytotherapy. 2004;6(1):23-9. doi: 10.1080/14653240310004557.
6
Factors affecting microbial contamination rate of cord blood collected for transplantation.影响用于移植的脐血微生物污染率的因素。
Transfusion. 2012 Aug;52(8):1770-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03507.x. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
7
Comparison of BACTEC PLUS blood culture media to BacT/Alert FA blood culture media for detection of bacterial pathogens in samples containing therapeutic levels of antibiotics.比较BACTEC PLUS血培养培养基与BacT/Alert FA血培养培养基在含有治疗水平抗生素的样本中检测细菌病原体的能力。
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Mar;45(3):816-21. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02064-06. Epub 2006 Dec 13.
8
Optimization of microbial screening for cord blood.脐血微生物筛查的优化。
Transfusion. 2014 Mar;54(3):550-9. doi: 10.1111/trf.12352. Epub 2013 Jul 28.
9
In-house validation of the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system for detection of bacterial contamination in platelet concentrates.BACTEC 9240血培养系统用于检测血小板浓缩物中细菌污染的室内验证
Transfusion. 2005 Jul;45(7):1138-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04343.x.
10
Optimization of cord blood unit sterility testing: impact of dilution, analysis delay, and inhibitory substances.脐血单位无菌检测的优化:稀释、分析延迟和抑制物质的影响
Transfusion. 2017 Aug;57(8):1956-1967. doi: 10.1111/trf.14147. Epub 2017 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Decontamination of Two Umbilical Cord Blood Grafts Prior to Autologous Administration.自体输注前两份脐带血移植物的净化处理
Maedica (Bucur). 2022 Dec;17(4):885-892. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2022.17.4.885.
2
Growth Performance and Recovery of Nosocomial spp. in Blood Culture Bottles.血培养瓶中医院菌株的生长性能与恢复情况
Microorganisms. 2022 Oct 13;10(10):2026. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10102026.
3
Comprehensive Evaluation of Compendial USP<71>, BacT/Alert Dual-T, and Bactec FX for Detection of Product Sterility Testing Contaminants.
《USP<71>、BacT/Alert Dual-T 和 Bactec FX 检测产品无菌测试污染物的综合评估》
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Jan 30;57(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01548-18. Print 2019 Feb.