Suppr超能文献

[超声心动图筛查与症状性诊断用于早产儿动脉导管未闭的比较]

[Echocardiographic screening vs. symptomatic diagnosis for patent ductus arteriosus in preterms].

作者信息

Juárez-Domínguez Gabriela, Iglesias-Leboreiro José, Rendón-Macías Mario Enrique, Bernardez-Zapata Isabel, Patiño-Bahena Emilia Josefina, Agami-Micha Sion, Ortega-García Karla Leticia, Torres-Palomino Gregory, Delgado-Franco Dagoberto

机构信息

Facultad Mexicana de Medicina, División de Postgrado, Universidad La Salle, Distrito Federal, México.

出版信息

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2015 Mar-Apr;53(2):136-41.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The persistence of ductus arteriosus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the possible benefit in the treatment for ductus closure when an early (less than 72 hours of life) echocardiographic screening is done versus when the echocardiographic diagnosis is realized only in present of associated symptoms.

METHODS

Preterm without malformation followed by two strategies: patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) screening or echocardiographic study on suspected PDA for symptoms (control group). We analyzed the ductus characteristics, the presence of pulmonary hypertension and the treatments for their closure. We analyze the result in relation of the premature age as late preterm (34 to 36 gestational age weeks), moderate (30 to 33) and extreme (< 30).

RESULTS

There was no difference in the proportion of newborns diagnosed with PDA among the strategies (screening 18.6 % [101/543] vs 18.1 % [55/304], p = 0.92). In the control group, 53 % were diagnosed after 72 hours of life. There were no differences in relation of the ductus characteristic among the groups. The closure treatment were similar in the two strategies among the moderate and late preterm, but was more aggressive in the control group in the extreme preterms.

CONCLUSIONS

The echocardiographic screening for PDA in extreme preterm newborns reduces the time to detect it, and allow to give less aggressive treatment. We do not recommend their use in moderate o late preterm newborn.

摘要

背景

动脉导管持续存在,本研究旨在评估在出生后早期(出生后72小时内)进行超声心动图筛查与仅在出现相关症状时进行超声心动图诊断相比,在动脉导管闭合治疗中可能的益处。

方法

无畸形的早产儿采用两种策略:动脉导管未闭(PDA)筛查或对疑似PDA症状进行超声心动图研究(对照组)。我们分析了动脉导管的特征、肺动脉高压的存在情况及其闭合治疗方法。我们根据早产程度(晚期早产,胎龄34至36周;中度早产,胎龄30至33周;极早早产,胎龄<30周)分析结果。

结果

两种策略中诊断为PDA的新生儿比例无差异(筛查组18.6%[101/543] vs 对照组18.1%[55/304],p = 0.92)。在对照组中,53%在出生72小时后被诊断。各组之间动脉导管特征无差异。中度和晚期早产儿中,两种策略的闭合治疗相似,但极早早产儿中对照组的治疗更积极。

结论

对极早早产新生儿进行PDA超声心动图筛查可缩短检测时间,并允许采用较不积极的治疗方法。我们不建议在中度或晚期早产新生儿中使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验