• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态微生物环境对厄他培南和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗西班牙复杂社区获得性腹腔内感染临床疗效的影响:一项成本-后果分析

Impact of a Dynamic Microbiological Environment on the Clinical Efficacy of Ertapenem and Piperacillin/Tazobactam in the Treatment of Complicated Community-Acquired Intra-Abdominal Infection in Spain: A Cost-Consequence Analysis.

作者信息

Grau Santiago, Lozano Virginia, Valladares Amparo, Cavanillas Rafael, Xie Yang, Nocea Gonzalo

机构信息

Hospital del Mar, Passeig Marítim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain,

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Aug;13(4):369-79. doi: 10.1007/s40258-015-0162-9.

DOI:10.1007/s40258-015-0162-9
PMID:25761545
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The microbial susceptibility of many antibiotics has been affected by prescribing patterns and their extensive use. The purpose of this evaluation was to assess how these changes could affect the initial efficacy of ertapenem and piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) acquired in the community and the potential consequences this may have in healthcare costs in Spain.

METHODS

The Initial efficacy of ertapenem and piperacillin/tazobactam for patients with APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) II scores <10 was extracted from a multicenter randomized study and were combined with the current microbial susceptibilities obtained from the SMART study, a multinational surveillance program. Country-specific pathogens distribution was extracted from a national study in patients with community-acquired IAI. The estimated effectiveness was used in a decision-analytic model to compare total costs between ertapenem and piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated IAI. The model performs extensive one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

The model suggested a savings of €209 (year 2012 values) per patient when complicated IAIs acquired in the community (APACHE II <10) were treated with ertapenem instead of piperacillin/tazobactam. One-way sensitivity analyses showed length of stay as the key driver parameter. Further analysis of this parameter and probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of our evaluation, with a 58% likelihood of ertapenem being dominant.

CONCLUSIONS

Ertapenem appears to be a cost-saving strategy over piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of patients with complicated IAIs acquired in the community in Spain.

摘要

背景与目的

许多抗生素的微生物敏感性受到处方模式及其广泛使用的影响。本评估的目的是评估这些变化如何影响厄他培南和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦在治疗社区获得性复杂性腹腔内感染(IAI)时的初始疗效,以及这可能对西班牙医疗成本产生的潜在影响。

方法

从一项多中心随机研究中提取厄他培南和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦用于急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分<10患者的初始疗效,并与从多国监测项目SMART研究中获得的当前微生物敏感性数据相结合。从一项关于社区获得性IAI患者的全国性研究中提取特定国家的病原体分布情况。将估计的有效性用于决策分析模型,以比较厄他培南和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗复杂性IAI的总成本。该模型进行了广泛的单向和概率敏感性分析。

结果

该模型表明,对于社区获得性复杂性IAI(APACHE II<10)患者,使用厄他培南而非哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗时,每位患者可节省209欧元(2012年价值)。单向敏感性分析表明住院时间是关键驱动参数。对该参数的进一步分析和概率敏感性分析证实了我们评估的稳健性,厄他培南占优的可能性为58%。

结论

在西班牙,对于治疗社区获得性复杂性IAI患者,厄他培南似乎是一种比哌拉西林/他唑巴坦更具成本效益的策略。

相似文献

1
Impact of a Dynamic Microbiological Environment on the Clinical Efficacy of Ertapenem and Piperacillin/Tazobactam in the Treatment of Complicated Community-Acquired Intra-Abdominal Infection in Spain: A Cost-Consequence Analysis.动态微生物环境对厄他培南和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗西班牙复杂社区获得性腹腔内感染临床疗效的影响:一项成本-后果分析
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Aug;13(4):369-79. doi: 10.1007/s40258-015-0162-9.
2
Cost-effectiveness evaluation of ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections accounting for antibiotic resistance.厄他培南与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗考虑抗生素耐药的复杂性腹腔内感染的成本-效果评价。
Value Health. 2009 Mar-Apr;12(2):234-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00439.x.
3
Accounting for the development of antibacterial resistance in the cost effectiveness of ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of diabetic foot infections in the UK.在英国,评估厄他培南与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗糖尿病足感染的成本效益时,需要考虑抗菌药物耐药性的发展。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(12):1045-56. doi: 10.2165/11310080-000000000-00000.
4
Cost-effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam plus metronidazole compared with piperacillin/tazobactam as empiric therapy for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections based on the in-vitro surveillance of bacterial isolates in the UK.基于英国细菌分离株的体外监测,比较头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦联合甲硝唑与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦作为经验性治疗复杂腹腔内感染的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2017 Aug;20(8):840-849. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1333960. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
5
Randomized, multicenter, double-blind study of efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalized adults.厄他培南静脉注射与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗住院成人复杂性腹腔内感染的疗效、安全性和耐受性的随机、多中心、双盲研究
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2007 Feb;8(1):15-28. doi: 10.1089/sur.2006.030.
6
Ertapenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam for treatment of mixed anaerobic complicated intra-abdominal, complicated skin and skin structure, and acute pelvic infections.厄他培南与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗混合性厌氧性复杂性腹腔内感染、复杂性皮肤及皮肤结构感染和急性盆腔感染的比较
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2002 Winter;3(4):303-14. doi: 10.1089/109629602762539535.
7
Ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections: results of a double-blind, randomized comparative phase III trial.厄他培南与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗复杂性腹腔内感染:一项双盲、随机对照III期试验的结果
Ann Surg. 2003 Feb;237(2):235-45. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000048551.32606.73.
8
Comparative costs of ertapenem and piperacillin-tazobactam in the treatment of diabetic foot infections.厄他培南与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗糖尿病足感染的成本比较
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 May 15;64(10):1080-6. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/64.10.1080.
9
Effect of body mass index on treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalized adults: comparison of ertapenem with piperacillin-tazobactam.体重指数对住院成人复杂腹腔内感染治疗的影响:厄他培南与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦的比较。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2012 Feb;13(1):38-42. doi: 10.1089/sur.2010.095. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
10
Efficacy of ertapenem in the treatment of serious infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae: analysis of pooled clinical trial data.厄他培南治疗肠杆菌科细菌所致严重感染的疗效:汇总临床试验数据分析
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 May;51(5):1253-60. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg237. Epub 2003 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of multiple drug resistance on total medical costs among patients with intra-abdominal infections in China.中国腹腔感染患者的多重耐药菌感染对总医疗费用的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 28;13(3):e0193977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193977. eCollection 2018.