Yetis Ulku, Jakobsen Jens Bjørn, Dilek Filiz B, Kıyık Enver, Mugoša Sanja, Novović Jadranka, Kerestecioglu Merih
Department of Environmental Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
COWI A/S, Lyngby, Denmark.
Waste Manag Res. 2015 May;33(5):477-85. doi: 10.1177/0734242X15574563. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
This study presents the options for source-segregation and selective collection of recyclable waste fractions for Cetinje, Montenegro, with the aim of meeting the European Union 50% waste recycling target in 2023, and extending collection and disposal system that builds on the existing strengths of the city. To this end, three options were considered: (1) source separation and separate collection of dry recyclable materials and central sorting of residual waste; (2) source separation and collection of co-mingled dry recyclable materials, and central sorting in a clean material recovery facility of comingled recyclables and central sorting of residual waste; (3) collection of mixed waste (current situation) and subsequent central sorting. Scenarios 1 and 2 were found to meet the European Union 50% recycling target in 2023, provided that a fast implementation of the new separate collection schemes to fine sort the co-mingled collected recyclable materials is available. Finally, a financial evaluation was made for the options and the investment and operational costs over a 20-year period were estimated. Unit costs for Scenario 3 were found to be lower than for Scenario 1 and 2. As Scenario 3 will not meet the future European Union recycling targets, Scenario 2 has been pointed as the most feasible scenario for Cetinje, with reference to the expected lower total costs compared with Scenario 1.
本研究提出了黑山共和国采蒂涅市可回收垃圾的源头分类和选择性收集方案，旨在实现欧盟2023年50%的垃圾回收目标，并在该市现有优势基础上扩展收集和处理系统。为此，考虑了三种方案：（1）对干可回收材料进行源头分类和单独收集，对残余垃圾进行集中分类；（2）对混合干可回收材料进行源头分类和收集，并在清洁的材料回收设施中对混合可回收物进行集中分类，对残余垃圾进行集中分类；（3）收集混合垃圾（现状）并随后进行集中分类。研究发现，方案1和方案2能够在2023年实现欧盟50%的回收目标，前提是能够迅速实施新的单独收集方案，对混合收集的可回收材料进行精细分类。最后，对这些方案进行了财务评估，并估算了20年期间的投资和运营成本。结果发现，方案3的单位成本低于方案1和方案2。由于方案3无法满足未来欧盟的回收目标，与方案1相比，方案2被认为是采蒂涅市最可行的方案，因为预计其总成本更低。
