Forum für Abfallwirtschaft und Altlasten e. V., Pirna, Germany.
Waste Manag Res. 2011 Sep;29(9):982-90. doi: 10.1177/0734242X11416156. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
To enforce material recycling of household waste at high levels, separate collection schemes often under a producer's responsibility regime were implemented in Germany since the 1970s and 1990s, respectively. The separate collection of recyclables (Sorting-Transportation-Sorting-Recovery' system) is assumed, guaranteeing higher purities of the collected material streams but also causing higher costs for logistics and the processing of the waste fractions. Several authors argue that since the rapid development of automatic sorting systems in recent years, a mixed collection of recyclables and residual household waste with a downstream sorting strategy (Transportation-Sorting-Recovery system) is cheaper than the currents system while keeping the product quality constant. This paper evaluates the economic saving potentials in logistics and the extra costs for separation technologies when implementing a mixed collection system for light packagings together with residual household waste in an East German city. The results show that costs for process technologies in a mixed collection system can overcompensate cost-saving potentials in logistics.
为了在较高水平上强制实施家庭废物的物质回收,德国分别在 20 世纪 70 年代和 90 年代实施了生产者责任制下的分类收集计划。可回收物的分类收集(“分类-运输-分类-回收”系统)是假设的,保证了收集物料流的更高纯度,但也导致物流和废物处理的成本更高。一些作者认为,由于近年来自动分类系统的快速发展,采用下游分类策略(“运输-分类-回收”系统)对可回收物和残余生活垃圾进行混合收集比当前系统更便宜,同时保持产品质量不变。本文评估了在东德城市中,将轻包装与残余生活垃圾混合收集系统时,物流方面的经济节约潜力和分离技术的额外成本。结果表明,混合收集系统中工艺技术的成本可以弥补物流方面的节约潜力。