Coelho F, Aguiar L F, Cunha G S P, Cardinot N, Lucena E
Centro de Infertilidade e Medicina Fetal do Norte Fluminense, Hospital Escola Álvaro Alvim, Rua Barão da Lagoa Dourada, 409-2 ° pavimento, Centro, 28035-210 Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brazil.
Centro Colombiano de Fertilidad y Esterilidad (CECOLFES) S.A.S., Calle 102 No. 14A-15, 56769 Bogota, Colombia.
Int J Reprod Med. 2014;2014:367474. doi: 10.1155/2014/367474. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
The ovarian stimulation has been applied in order to increase the number of oocytes to compensate for the poor results of in vitro fertilization, allowing the selection of one or more embryos to be transferred. Our aim is to compare the results obtained in IVF/ICSI cycles using the short protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation to the results from the modified mild protocol used in our department. A total of 240 cycles were conducted from January 2010 to December 2011. When comparing both protocols, it could be observed that there was a significant difference in the quantity of gonadotropins doses in the mild protocol and in the short protocol. No significant difference was observed regarding pregnancy rates per cycle, 22% and 26.2%, in short and mild protocols, respectively. The protocols of controlled ovarian stimulation are often associated with high risk of complications such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, excessive emotional stress, high rates of treatment dropouts, and abdominal discomfort. With the data obtained in this study, one can conclude that there are less risks and complications for the patient when using the mild stimulation protocol. It was also observed that in this group there was a slightly higher rate.
应用卵巢刺激是为了增加卵母细胞数量,以弥补体外受精效果不佳的问题,从而能够选择一个或多个胚胎进行移植。我们的目的是比较采用短期方案进行控制性卵巢刺激的体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射(IVF/ICSI)周期所获得的结果与我们科室使用的改良温和方案的结果。2010年1月至2011年12月共进行了240个周期。比较这两种方案时,可以观察到温和方案和短期方案中促性腺激素剂量的数量存在显著差异。在每个周期的妊娠率方面未观察到显著差异,短期方案和温和方案的妊娠率分别为22%和26.2%。控制性卵巢刺激方案通常与诸如卵巢过度刺激综合征、过度情绪压力、高治疗退出率和腹部不适等高并发症风险相关。根据本研究获得的数据,可以得出结论,使用温和刺激方案时患者面临的风险和并发症较少。还观察到该组的比率略高。