Suppr超能文献

唑尼沙胺与普瑞巴林作为难治性癫痫儿童辅助治疗的疗效比较

Comparative efficacy of zonisamide and pregabalin as an adjunctive therapy in children with refractory epilepsy.

作者信息

Taghdiri Mohammad Mahdi, Bakhshandeh Bali Mohammad Kazem, Karimzadeh Parvaneh, Ashrafi Mohammad Reza, Tonekaboni Seyed Hassan, Ghofrani Mohammad

机构信息

Pediatric Neurology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ; Pediatric Neurology Center of Excellence, Department of Pediatric Neurology, Mofid Children Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Pediatric Neurology Center of Excellence, Department of Pediatric Neurology, Mofid Children Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Iran J Child Neurol. 2015 Winter;9(1):49-55.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Approximately one third of epileptic children are resistant to anticonvulsant drugs. This study evaluates the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of pregabalin as adjunctive therapy in epileptic children relative to Zonisamide.

MATERIALS & METHODS: From April 2012 to November 2012,121 children were referred to Mofid Children's Hospital with intractable epilepsy and enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into two groups (A and B) randomly. Group A was treated with Zonisamide and group B was treated with Pregabalin in addition to prior medication. We assessed seizure frequency and severity during a 4-week interval from the beginning of the drug treatment and compared the efficacy of each in these two groups.

RESULTS

Group A consists of 61 patients, 26 (42.6%) girls, and35 (57.4%) boys with an age range from 1.5 months-14 years (mean, 73.9± 44.04 months). Group B consists of 60 patients, 31(51.7%) girls, 29 (48.3%) boys with an age range from 6 months-16 years (mean, 71±42.9 months). Age, gender, seizure onset, seizure frequency, seizure type, and previous antiepileptic medications showed that there was no significant difference between the groups (P>0.05). Zonisamide and pregabalin reduced more than 50% of seizure intensity in 40.2%; 45.8% of patients also had a seizure frequency decline between35.8-44.4%, respectively and there was no significant superiority between these two novel anticonvulsants (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

In this survey both pregabalin and Zonisamide were impressive for seizure control in children with intractable epilepsy and well sustained with mild complications that were completely reversible.

摘要

目的

约三分之一的癫痫儿童对抗惊厥药物耐药。本研究评估了普瑞巴林作为辅助治疗药物相对于唑尼沙胺治疗癫痫儿童的有效性、安全性和耐受性。

材料与方法

2012年4月至2012年11月,121名患有难治性癫痫的儿童被转诊至莫菲德儿童医院并纳入研究。患者被随机分为两组(A组和B组)。A组接受唑尼沙胺治疗,B组在原用药基础上加用普瑞巴林治疗。我们在药物治疗开始后的4周内评估癫痫发作频率和严重程度,并比较两组的疗效。

结果

A组有61例患者,其中女孩26例(42.6%),男孩35例(57.4%),年龄范围为1.5个月至14岁(平均73.9±44.04个月)。B组有60例患者,其中女孩31例(51.7%),男孩29例(48.3%),年龄范围为6个月至16岁(平均71±42.9个月)。年龄、性别、癫痫发作起始、发作频率、发作类型和既往抗癫痫药物治疗情况显示两组之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。唑尼沙胺和普瑞巴林分别使40.2%、45.8%的患者癫痫发作强度降低超过50%,癫痫发作频率分别下降35.8 - 44.4%,这两种新型抗惊厥药物之间无显著优势(P>0.05)。

结论

在本次调查中,普瑞巴林和唑尼沙胺对难治性癫痫儿童的癫痫控制效果显著,且并发症轻微且完全可逆。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba04/4322499/861d811695fe/ijcn-9-049-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验