In vitro multidrug resistance of P388 murine leukemia selected for resistance to diaziquone.

P388 leukemia sublines were isolated from leukemia-cell-bearing CD2F1 mice that had been treated in vivo with increasing amounts of diaziquone (AZQ). The sublines isolated for in vitro studies were AZQ19 and AZQ30 which corresponded to the 19th and 30th in vivo passages, respectively. The AZQ19 subline displayed a very low degree of resistance to AZQ (1.5-fold), whereas the AZQ30 subline was sensitive. Both sublines, however, had much higher degrees of resistance to Adriamycin than to AZQ (24-fold for AZQ30 cells and 10-fold for AZQ19 cells). Both cell lines were also more resistant to actinomycin D, colchicine, and vincristine than to AZQ. The AZQ19 line was resistant to the alkylator thio-TEPA to the same degree that it was to AZQ, but the AZQ30 line was sensitive to thio-TEPA. On the other hand, AZQ30 cells were resistant to hydrogen peroxide with a very low degree of resistance (1.27-fold, P less than 0.05), whereas the AZQ19 line was sensitive. Drug accumulation experiments indicated that AZQ-resistant cells differed from the parental line in that they did not accumulate Adriamycin or vinblastine. In the case of AZQ, however, resistant and parental lines accumulated the same amounts of exchangeable AZQ. Using the immunoblotting technique, no P-glycoprotein was found in resistant cells. The resistant lines consumed oxygen at greater rates than the parental line. Oxygen consumption (Mean +/- SD) in sensitive cells was 2.0 +/- 0.4% O2 consumed/min, whereas in resistant cells it was nearly 3.1 +/- 0.6% O2 consumed/min. The increase in oxygen consumption with drug resistance was statistically significant (P less than 0.01). The kinetics of production of hydroxyl free radicals and of AZQ free radicals were faster in the resistant lines reflecting, in essence, their increased oxygen consumption. It appears that the two sublines analyzed here show resistance mechanisms that may have been elicited by the two distinct chemical constituents of AZQ. Therefore, in the AZQ19-resistant line, the alkylating aspect of AZQ was emphasized, whereas in the AZQ30 line, the quinone and, thus, free radical aspect was emphasized. This is consistent with AZQ30 cells being sensitive to the alkylator thio-TEPA and resistant to hydrogen peroxide, and the AZQ19 line being resistant to thio-TEPA and sensitive to hydrogen peroxide. In addition, the AZQ30 cell line was relatively more resistant than the AZQ19 line to Adriamycin.