Jansen Maurice P H M, Sas Leen, Sieuwerts Anieta M, Van Cauwenberghe Caroline, Ramirez-Ardila Diana, Look Maxime, Ruigrok-Ritstier Kirsten, Finetti Pascal, Bertucci François, Timmermans Mieke M, van Deurzen Carolien H M, Martens John W M, Simon Iris, Roepman Paul, Linn Sabine C, van Dam Peter, Kok Marleen, Lardon Filip, Vermeulen Peter B, Foekens John A, Dirix Luc, Berns Els M J J, Van Laere Steven
Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Wytemaweg 80, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Translational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals St-Augustinus, Oosterveldlaan 24, Antwerp B2610, Belgium; Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, B2650 Antwerp, Belgium.
Mol Oncol. 2015 Jun;9(6):1218-33. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
BACKGROUND: Patients with Estrogen Receptor α-positive (ER+) Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) are less responsive to endocrine therapy compared with ER+ non-IBC (nIBC) patients. The study of ER+ IBC samples might reveal biomarkers for endocrine resistant breast cancer. MATERIALS & METHODS: Gene expression profiles of ER+ samples from 201 patients were explored for genes that discriminated between IBC and nIBC. Classifier genes were applied onto clinically annotated expression data from 947 patients with ER+ breast cancer and validated with RT-qPCR for 231 patients treated with first-line tamoxifen. Relationships with metastasis-free survival (MFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) following adjuvant and first-line endocrine treatment, respectively, were investigated using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A metagene of six genes including the genes encoding for 4-aminobutyrate aminotransferase (ABAT) and Stanniocalcin-2 (STC2) were identified to distinguish 22 ER+ IBC from 43 ER+ nIBC patients and remained discriminatory in an independent series of 136 patients. The metagene and two genes were not prognostic in 517 (neo)adjuvant untreated lymph node-negative ER+ nIBC breast cancer patients. Only ABAT was related to outcome in 250 patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen. Three independent series of in total 411 patients with advanced disease showed increased metagene scores and decreased expression of ABAT and STC2 to be correlated with poor first-line endocrine therapy outcome. The biomarkers remained predictive for first-line tamoxifen treatment outcome in multivariate analysis including traditional factors or published signatures. In an exploratory analysis, ABAT and STC2 protein expression levels had no relation with PFS after first-line tamoxifen. CONCLUSIONS: This study utilized ER+ IBC to identify a metagene including ABAT and STC2 as predictive biomarkers for endocrine therapy resistance.
背景:与雌激素受体α阳性(ER+)非炎性乳腺癌(nIBC)患者相比,ER+炎性乳腺癌(IBC)患者对内分泌治疗的反应较差。对ER+ IBC样本的研究可能会揭示内分泌抵抗性乳腺癌的生物标志物。 材料与方法:探索了201例患者的ER+样本的基因表达谱,以寻找区分IBC和nIBC的基因。将分类基因应用于947例ER+乳腺癌患者的临床注释表达数据,并通过RT-qPCR对231例接受一线他莫昔芬治疗的患者进行验证。分别使用Cox回归分析研究了辅助内分泌治疗和一线内分泌治疗后无转移生存期(MFS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的关系。 结果:鉴定出一个由六个基因组成的元基因,包括编码4-氨基丁酸转氨酶(ABAT)和骨钙素-2(STC2)的基因,可区分22例ER+ IBC患者和43例ER+ nIBC患者,并且在136例独立患者系列中仍具有区分性。该元基因和两个基因在517例(新)辅助未治疗的淋巴结阴性ER+ nIBC乳腺癌患者中无预后价值。在250例接受辅助他莫昔芬治疗的患者中,只有ABAT与预后相关。总共411例晚期疾病患者的三个独立系列显示,元基因评分增加以及ABAT和STC2表达降低与一线内分泌治疗效果差相关。在包括传统因素或已发表特征的多变量分析中,这些生物标志物仍然可以预测一线他莫昔芬治疗的结果。在一项探索性分析中,ABAT和STC2蛋白表达水平与一线他莫昔芬治疗后的PFS无关。 结论:本研究利用ER+ IBC鉴定出一个包括ABAT和STC2的元基因,作为内分泌治疗耐药性的预测生物标志物。
Curr Med Sci. 2019-12-16
J Pathol Clin Res. 2018-8-23
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009-7
Clin Cancer Res. 2004-11-15
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2025-2-19
Biophys Rep. 2021-6-30
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014-12-4
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011-8-4