Suppr超能文献

他克莫司和甲氨蝶呤联合阿巴西普治疗类风湿关节炎患者的疗效和安全性比较:TBC 登记处的一项回顾性观察研究

Comparison of efficacy and safety of tacrolimus and methotrexate in combination with abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; a retrospective observational study in the TBC Registry.

作者信息

Fujibayashi Takayoshi, Takahashi Nobunori, Kida Daihei, Kaneko Atsushi, Hirano Yuji, Fukaya Naoki, Yabe Yuichiro, Oguchi Takeshi, Tsuboi Seiji, Miyake Hiroyuki, Takemoto Toki, Kawasaki Masashi, Ishiguro Naoki, Kojima Toshihisa

机构信息

a Department of Orthopedic Surgery , Konan Kosei Hospital , Aichi , Japan.

b Department of Orthopedic Surgery , Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine , Nagoya, Aichi , Japan.

出版信息

Mod Rheumatol. 2015;25(6):825-30. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2015.1029238. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Tacrolimus (TAC) and abatacept (ABT) inhibit T-cells via different mechanisms and, in combination, may be effective against rheumatoid arthritis. However, they may also disrupt normal immune functions. We compared the efficacy and safety of ABT administered to patients in combination with TAC, methotrexate (MTX), or other drugs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective multicenter study conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of ABT in 211 patients: the drug was administered together with TAC (ABT+ TAC group; 22 patients), MTX (ABT+ MTX group; 102 patients), or patients treated without concomitant MTX or TAC (ABT mono group; 87 patients). The disease activity, treatment continuation rate, and reason for discontinuation of treatment were investigated.

RESULTS

The retention rate at Week 24 was similar in the three groups. There were no cases of discontinuation related to the appearance of adverse events in the ABT+ TAC group. At Week 24, according to the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria, the "good" response rates were 33.3%, 13.4%, and 13.4% in the ABT+ TAC, ABT+ MTX, and ABT mono groups, respectively. Statistically significant decreases in various disease activity scores/indices were observed in all the groups as early as Week 4.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the sample size was small, the results of this retrospective study suggest that the ABT+ TAC combination therapy has at least comparable safety and efficacy to those of the ABT+ MTX combination, and that it can thus be a useful option for patients who cannot take MTX.

摘要

目的

他克莫司(TAC)和阿巴西普(ABT)通过不同机制抑制T细胞,联合使用可能对类风湿性关节炎有效。然而,它们也可能扰乱正常免疫功能。我们比较了ABT与TAC、甲氨蝶呤(MTX)或其他药物联合应用于患者时的疗效和安全性。

方法

这是一项回顾性多中心研究,旨在比较211例患者使用ABT的疗效和安全性:药物与TAC联合使用(ABT+TAC组;22例患者)、MTX联合使用(ABT+MTX组;102例患者),或未同时使用MTX或TAC的患者(ABT单药组;87例患者)。研究了疾病活动度、治疗持续率和停药原因。

结果

三组在第24周的保留率相似。ABT+TAC组没有因不良事件出现而停药的病例。在第24周,根据欧洲抗风湿病联盟的反应标准,ABT+TAC组、ABT+MTX组和ABT单药组的“良好”反应率分别为33.3%、13.4%和13.4%。早在第4周时,所有组的各种疾病活动评分/指数均出现了统计学上的显著下降。

结论

尽管样本量较小,但这项回顾性研究的结果表明,ABT+TAC联合治疗的安全性和疗效至少与ABT+MTX联合治疗相当,因此对于不能服用MTX的患者而言,它可能是一个有用的选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验