Fujibayashi Takayoshi, Takahashi Nobunori, Kida Daihei, Kaneko Atsushi, Hirano Yuji, Fukaya Naoki, Yabe Yuichiro, Oguchi Takeshi, Tsuboi Seiji, Miyake Hiroyuki, Takemoto Toki, Kawasaki Masashi, Ishiguro Naoki, Kojima Toshihisa
a Department of Orthopedic Surgery , Konan Kosei Hospital , Aichi , Japan.
b Department of Orthopedic Surgery , Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine , Nagoya, Aichi , Japan.
Mod Rheumatol. 2015;25(6):825-30. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2015.1029238. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
Tacrolimus (TAC) and abatacept (ABT) inhibit T-cells via different mechanisms and, in combination, may be effective against rheumatoid arthritis. However, they may also disrupt normal immune functions. We compared the efficacy and safety of ABT administered to patients in combination with TAC, methotrexate (MTX), or other drugs.
This was a retrospective multicenter study conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of ABT in 211 patients: the drug was administered together with TAC (ABT+ TAC group; 22 patients), MTX (ABT+ MTX group; 102 patients), or patients treated without concomitant MTX or TAC (ABT mono group; 87 patients). The disease activity, treatment continuation rate, and reason for discontinuation of treatment were investigated.
The retention rate at Week 24 was similar in the three groups. There were no cases of discontinuation related to the appearance of adverse events in the ABT+ TAC group. At Week 24, according to the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria, the "good" response rates were 33.3%, 13.4%, and 13.4% in the ABT+ TAC, ABT+ MTX, and ABT mono groups, respectively. Statistically significant decreases in various disease activity scores/indices were observed in all the groups as early as Week 4.
Although the sample size was small, the results of this retrospective study suggest that the ABT+ TAC combination therapy has at least comparable safety and efficacy to those of the ABT+ MTX combination, and that it can thus be a useful option for patients who cannot take MTX.
他克莫司(TAC)和阿巴西普(ABT)通过不同机制抑制T细胞,联合使用可能对类风湿性关节炎有效。然而,它们也可能扰乱正常免疫功能。我们比较了ABT与TAC、甲氨蝶呤(MTX)或其他药物联合应用于患者时的疗效和安全性。
这是一项回顾性多中心研究,旨在比较211例患者使用ABT的疗效和安全性:药物与TAC联合使用(ABT+TAC组;22例患者)、MTX联合使用(ABT+MTX组;102例患者),或未同时使用MTX或TAC的患者(ABT单药组;87例患者)。研究了疾病活动度、治疗持续率和停药原因。
三组在第24周的保留率相似。ABT+TAC组没有因不良事件出现而停药的病例。在第24周,根据欧洲抗风湿病联盟的反应标准,ABT+TAC组、ABT+MTX组和ABT单药组的“良好”反应率分别为33.3%、13.4%和13.4%。早在第4周时,所有组的各种疾病活动评分/指数均出现了统计学上的显著下降。
尽管样本量较小,但这项回顾性研究的结果表明,ABT+TAC联合治疗的安全性和疗效至少与ABT+MTX联合治疗相当,因此对于不能服用MTX的患者而言,它可能是一个有用的选择。