Thiruselvam Indrani, Vogt Elisabeth M, Hoelzle James B
Department of Psychology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA
Department of Psychology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2015 May;30(3):248-55. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acv010. Epub 2015 Mar 15.
We investigated the similarity of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV) Auditory Memory Index (AMI) scores when California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II) scores are substituted for WMS-IV Verbal Paired Associates (VPA) subtest scores. College students (n = 103) were administered select WMS-IV subtests and the CVLT-II in a randomized order. Immediate and delayed VPA scaled scores were significantly greater than VPA substitute scaled scores derived from CVLT-II performance. At the Index level, AMI scores were significantly lower when CVLT-II scores were used in place of VPA scores. It is important that clinicians recognize the accepted substitution of CVLT-II scores can result in WMS-IV scores that are inconsistent with those derived from standard administration. Psychometric issues that plausibly contribute to these differences and clinical implications are discussed.
我们研究了用加利福尼亚言语学习测验第二版(CVLT-II)的分数替代韦氏记忆量表第四版(WMS-IV)言语配对联想(VPA)分测验分数时,WMS-IV听觉记忆指数(AMI)分数的相似性。对103名大学生按照随机顺序施测了选定的WMS-IV分测验和CVLT-II。VPA即时和延迟量表分数显著高于从CVLT-II成绩得出的VPA替代量表分数。在指数水平上,当使用CVLT-II分数替代VPA分数时,AMI分数显著更低。临床医生必须认识到,接受用CVLT-II分数替代会导致WMS-IV分数与标准施测得出的分数不一致,这一点很重要。文中讨论了可能导致这些差异的心理测量学问题及其临床意义。