Villalobos-Guerrero Tulio F, Carrera-Parra Luis F
El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Unidad Chetumal, Estructura y Función del Bentos, Departamento de Sistemática y Ecología Acuática, Av. Centenario, Chetumal, Quintana Roo, 77014, México; Email:
Zootaxa. 2015 Feb 16;3919(1):157-78. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3919.1.7.
The nereidid worm Alitta succinea (Leuckart, 1847), described from Western Germany, has been considered by some authors as a widespread and alien invasive species, or else as a group of morphologically indistinguishable species. Neither idea has yet been supported by critical taxonomic revisions of relevant material. Most characterizations of A. succinea were based upon a mixture of morphological features from specimens from the type locality and from other regions. Moreover, four species described from America are considered junior synonyms of A. succinea, including Nereis acutifolia Ehlers, 1901, described from the eastern tropical Pacific. The type material of the latter species has not been reviewed since its description. We re-examined type and topotype materials of A. succinea and N. acutifolia including atokous and epitokous specimens. In addition, newly collected specimens were used to evaluate genetic divergence between both species using the mitochondrial gene COI. Alitta succinea is redescribed from type material and specimens from Germany. We rejected the recent placement of the species in Neanthes and we transferred it to Alitta. Further, we refuse the synonymy of N. acutifolia with A. succinea due to morphological and molecular differences. Consequently, we regard Alitta acutifolia n. comb. as a valid species, and the supposed introduction and the alien status of A. succinea along the Mexican and Central American Pacific shores are rejected.
多鳞沙蚕(Alitta succinea)(Leuckart,1847年)最初是在德国西部被描述的,一些作者认为它是一种广泛分布的外来入侵物种,或者是一组形态上难以区分的物种。然而,这两种观点都尚未得到对相关材料进行的严格分类学修订的支持。大多数对多鳞沙蚕的描述都是基于来自模式产地和其他地区标本的形态特征的混合。此外,从美国描述的四个物种被认为是多鳞沙蚕的次异名,包括1901年从东热带太平洋描述的尖叶沙蚕(Nereis acutifolia)。自该物种被描述以来,其模式材料尚未被重新审视。我们重新检查了多鳞沙蚕和尖叶沙蚕的模式材料和地模标本,包括无性个体和有性个体标本。此外,我们使用新收集的标本,通过线粒体基因COI来评估这两个物种之间的遗传差异。我们根据模式材料和来自德国的标本对多鳞沙蚕进行了重新描述。我们拒绝了该物种最近被归入新索沙蚕属(Neanthes)的分类,并将其转移到沙蚕属(Alitta)。此外,由于形态和分子差异,我们拒绝将尖叶沙蚕与多鳞沙蚕视为同义词。因此,我们认为尖叶沙蚕(Alitta acutifolia)新组合是一个有效物种,并否认多鳞沙蚕在墨西哥和中美洲太平洋沿岸所谓的引入和外来物种地位。