Suppr超能文献

预测有不良分娩和新生儿结局风险婴儿的小于胎龄和大于胎龄阈值:当前图表是否足够?来自布拉德福德出生队列的一项观察性研究。

Small-for-gestational age and large-for-gestational age thresholds to predict infants at risk of adverse delivery and neonatal outcomes: are current charts adequate? An observational study from the Born in Bradford cohort.

作者信息

Norris T, Johnson W, Farrar D, Tuffnell D, Wright J, Cameron N

机构信息

Centre for Global Health and Human Development, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.

MRC Unit for Lifelong Health & Ageing, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 17;5(3):e006743. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006743.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Construct an ethnic-specific chart and compare the prediction of adverse outcomes using this chart with the clinically recommended UK-WHO and customised birth weight charts using cut-offs for small-for-gestational age (SGA: birth weight <10th centile) and large-for-gestational age (LGA: birth weight >90th centile).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Born in Bradford (BiB) study, UK.

PARTICIPANTS

3980 White British and 4448 Pakistani infants with complete data for gestational age, birth weight, ethnicity, maternal height, weight and parity.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of SGA and LGA, using the three charts and indicators of diagnostic utility (sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC)) of these chart-specific cut-offs to predict delivery and neonatal outcomes and a composite outcome.

RESULTS

In White British and Pakistani infants, the prevalence of SGA and LGA differed depending on the chart used. Increased risk of SGA was observed when using the UK-WHO and customised charts as opposed to the ethnic-specific chart, while the opposite was apparent when classifying LGA infants. However, the predictive utility of all three charts to identify adverse clinical outcomes was poor, with only the prediction of shoulder dystocia achieving an AUROC>0.62 on all three charts.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being recommended in national clinical guidelines, the UK-WHO and customised birth weight charts perform poorly at identifying infants at risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. Being small or large may increase the risk of an adverse outcome; however, size alone is not sensitive or specific enough with current detection to be useful. However, a significant amount of missing data for some of the outcomes may have limited the power needed to determine true associations.

摘要

目的

构建特定种族图表,并将使用该图表预测不良结局的情况与临床推荐的英国世界卫生组织(UK-WHO)图表以及根据小于胎龄儿(SGA:出生体重<第10百分位数)和大于胎龄儿(LGA:出生体重>第90百分位数)临界值定制的出生体重图表进行比较。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

英国布拉德福德出生队列(BiB)研究。

参与者

3980名英国白人婴儿和4448名巴基斯坦婴儿,他们具有完整的胎龄、出生体重、种族、母亲身高、体重和产次数据。

主要结局指标

使用这三种图表得出的SGA和LGA患病率,以及这些图表特定临界值预测分娩和新生儿结局及复合结局的诊断效用指标(敏感性、特异性和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC))。

结果

在英国白人婴儿和巴基斯坦婴儿中,SGA和LGA的患病率因所使用的图表而异。与特定种族图表相比,使用UK-WHO图表和定制图表时观察到SGA风险增加,而在对LGA婴儿进行分类时情况则相反。然而,所有三种图表识别不良临床结局的预测效用都很差,只有肩难产的预测在所有三种图表上的AUROC>0.62。

结论

尽管UK-WHO图表和定制出生体重图表在国家临床指南中被推荐,但它们在识别有新生儿不良结局风险的婴儿方面表现不佳。出生体重过小或过大可能会增加不良结局的风险;然而,就目前的检测而言,仅出生体重大小不够敏感或特异,无法发挥作用。不过,某些结局的大量数据缺失可能限制了确定真实关联所需的效能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ece/4368928/1d2064d42bea/bmjopen2014006743f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验