Suppr超能文献

乳房切除术死腔的褥式缝合与带引流管的传统缝合的比较

Quilting Suture of Mastectomy Dead Space Compared with Conventional Closure with Drain.

作者信息

Ouldamer Lobna, Caille Agnès, Giraudeau Bruno, Body Gilles

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France.

INSERM Unit 1069, Tours, France.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22(13):4233-40. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4511-6. Epub 2015 Mar 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was designed to compare conventional closure with a drain and quilting suture of mastectomy dead space for preventing wound seroma.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer were included in this retrospective observational study. Patients received conventional closure with drainage or quilting suture for wound closure. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed based on potential confounders to minimize selection bias. The primary outcome was the rate of type 2 or 3 wound seroma according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) definition.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients were included (quilting suture n = 59; conventional closure n = 60). Type 2 or 3 seroma was observed in 6.8 % of the quilting suture group and 21.7 % of the conventional closure group (crude odds ratio 0.26; 95 % confidence interval 0.08-0.86; p = 0.03). The overall seroma rate was 15.2 % in the quilting suture group and 51.7 % in the conventional closure group (p < 0.001). Persistent pain at days 15-21 was significantly less frequent in the quilting suture group than in the conventional suture group. PS matched analysis confirmed these findings, in particular the lower rate of type 2 or 3 seroma in the quilting suture group than in the conventional closure group (PS-matched odds ratio 0.16; 95 % confidence interval 0.04-0.72; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Quilting suture of the mastectomy dead space is associated with significantly less frequent seroma than conventional closure with drain.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较乳腺癌根治术死腔的传统缝合加引流与褥式缝合在预防伤口血清肿方面的效果。

方法

本回顾性观察研究纳入了连续接受乳腺癌根治术的患者。患者接受传统缝合引流或褥式缝合进行伤口闭合。根据潜在混杂因素进行倾向评分(PS)匹配,以尽量减少选择偏倚。主要结局是根据不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)定义的2级或3级伤口血清肿发生率。

结果

共纳入119例患者(褥式缝合组n = 59;传统缝合组n = 60)。褥式缝合组2级或3级血清肿发生率为6.8%,传统缝合组为21.7%(粗比值比0.26;95%置信区间0.08 - 0.86;p = 0.03)。褥式缝合组总体血清肿发生率为15.2%,传统缝合组为51.7%(p < 0.001)。褥式缝合组在术后15 - 21天持续疼痛的发生率明显低于传统缝合组。PS匹配分析证实了这些结果,特别是褥式缝合组2级或3级血清肿的发生率低于传统缝合组(PS匹配比值比0.16;95%置信区间0.04 - 0.72;p = 0.02)。

结论

乳腺癌根治术死腔的褥式缝合与传统缝合加引流相比,血清肿的发生率显著降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验