Tozer Wade C, Rice Barbara, Westoby Mark
Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.
Am J Bot. 2015 Mar;102(3):367-78. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1400379. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
•
The question why leaf dimensions vary so much between species has long puzzled ecologists. Presumably, variation arises from selective forces acting on leaf function but which selective forces and which leaf functions? This investigation assesses the consistency of divergence in plant traits and habitat variables in association with leaf width divergence in the flora of NSW, Australia.•
More than 80 traits and habitat variables were measured for 25 independent evolutionary divergence events (PICs). Each PIC was represented by two related plant species that had diverged substantially in leaf width. Outgroup species provided indications of the direction of divergence. Most PICs were within genus, so divergences represent relatively recent evolutionary events.•
No plant traits or habitat variables were 100% consistently associated with a divergence in leaf width, and surprisingly few diverged in a consistent direction significantly more than what might be expected by chance. This surprising lack of consistent divergence with leaf width contrasted with the result that many of these traits and habitat variables were correlated with leaf width across all species in our data set and in line with correlations reported from other studies. Subcategorizing PICs according to the probable direction of leaf width divergence did not improve consistency.•
These results indicate that evolutionarily recent leaf width divergence events are not tightly tied to divergences in other leaf traits or in environmental situations, despite the broad correlations that have been observed across many species. Rather, cross species correlations are underpinned by earlier divergence events in the phylogeny.
研究前提:长期以来,叶片尺寸在物种间为何差异如此之大的问题一直困扰着生态学家。据推测,这种差异源于作用于叶片功能的选择力,但具体是哪些选择力以及哪些叶片功能呢?本研究评估了澳大利亚新南威尔士植物区系中植物性状和生境变量的分歧与叶片宽度分歧之间的一致性。
方法:针对25个独立的进化分歧事件(PICs),测量了80多个性状和生境变量。每个PIC由两个在叶片宽度上有显著差异的相关植物物种代表。外类群物种提供了分歧方向的指示。大多数PICs在属内,因此分歧代表相对较新的进化事件。
关键结果:没有植物性状或生境变量与叶片宽度的分歧100%一致相关,令人惊讶的是,很少有性状或变量在一致方向上的分歧显著超过随机预期。这种与叶片宽度缺乏一致分歧的情况令人惊讶,与以下结果形成对比:在我们的数据集中,许多这些性状和生境变量与所有物种的叶片宽度相关,并且与其他研究报告的相关性一致。根据叶片宽度分歧的可能方向对PICs进行分类并没有提高一致性。
结论:这些结果表明,尽管在许多物种中观察到广泛的相关性,但在进化上较新的叶片宽度分歧事件与其他叶片性状或环境状况的分歧并没有紧密联系。相反,跨物种的相关性是由系统发育中更早的分歧事件所支撑的。