Suppr超能文献

氢氟烷烃-丙酸倍氯米松自动吸入器与布地奈德都保在哮喘控制方面的比较。

Comparison of hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate Autohaler with budesonide Turbuhaler in asthma control.

作者信息

Worth H, Muir J F, Pieters W R

机构信息

Medizinische Klinik I, Klinikum Fürth, Germany.

出版信息

Respiration. 2001;68(5):517-26. doi: 10.1159/000050561.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate Autohaler (HFA-BDP AH) is a breath-actuated chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free metered dose inhaler in which BDP is in a solution of HFA propellant. Budesonide Turbuhaler (BUD TH) is a breath-dependent dry powder inhaler.

OBJECTIVES

To test the hypothesis that half the daily dose of HFA-BDP AH would provide an equivalent control of asthma symptoms to the BUD TH.

METHODS

This was an 8-week open study in patients with symptomatic moderate-to-severe asthma, previously on BUD 500-1,000 microg x day(-1), or an equivalent. After 5-14 days' run-in, patients were randomized to HFA-BDP AH 800 microg x day(-1) or BUD TH 1,600 microg x day(-1). The intent-to-treat population consisted of 111 patients on HFA-BDP AH and 98 patients on BUD TH.

RESULTS

Mean change from baseline in PEF in the morning (AM PEF) at week 8 was 23.95 liters x min(-1) for HFA-BDP AH and 24.46 liters x min(-1) for BUD TH. A two-sided equivalence test using the 0.51 liter x min(-1) difference gave 95% confidence intervals within a defined equivalence interval of (-infinity, 25 liters x min(-1)) indicating that the mean change in AM PEF was equivalent for the two groups. There were no significant differences in the mean change from baseline in FEV1 or beta-agonist use. Patients using HFA-BDP AH had a significantly greater mean change from baseline in the percentage of days free from shortness of breath (p = 0.05), chest tightness (p = 0.02) and nights without sleep disturbance (p = 0.04) at week 3, and wheeze (p = 0.01), shortness of breath (p = 0.02), chest tightness (p < 0.01) and daily asthma symptoms (p = 0.03) at week 8. The incidence, type and severity of adverse events were similar in each group. At week 8, the mean change from baseline in corrected urine cortisol/creatinine ratio in a subgroup of patients was -0.36 for HFA-BDP and -4.88 for BUD TH (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

HFA-BDP 800 microg x day(-1) provided control of moderate-to-severe asthma with efficacy and safety at least similar to BUD TH 1,600 microg x day(-1).

摘要

背景

氢氟烷烃-二丙酸倍氯米松自动吸入器(HFA-BDP AH)是一种无需手动启动的无氯氟烃(CFC)定量吸入器,其中倍氯米松二丙酸酯(BDP)溶解于氢氟烷烃推进剂中。布地奈德都保(BUD TH)是一种依赖吸入气流的干粉吸入器。

目的

检验以下假设:HFA-BDP AH每日剂量的一半能提供与BUD TH等效的哮喘症状控制效果。

方法

这是一项针对有症状的中重度哮喘患者的为期8周的开放性研究,这些患者之前使用布地奈德剂量为500 - 1000微克/天,或等效剂量。经过5 - 14天的导入期后,患者被随机分为两组,一组使用HFA-BDP AH,剂量为800微克/天;另一组使用BUD TH,剂量为1600微克/天。意向性分析人群包括111例使用HFA-BDP AH的患者和98例使用BUD TH的患者。

结果

第8周时,HFA-BDP AH组早晨呼气峰流速(AM PEF)较基线的平均变化为23.95升/分钟,BUD TH组为24.46升/分钟。采用0.51升/分钟的差异进行双侧等效性检验,得出95%置信区间在规定的等效区间(-∞,25升/分钟)内,表明两组AM PEF的平均变化相当。第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)或β-激动剂使用量较基线的平均变化无显著差异。使用HFA-BDP AH的患者在第3周时,无气短天数的百分比(p = 0.05)、无胸闷天数的百分比(p = 0.02)以及无睡眠障碍夜晚数的百分比(p = 0.04)较基线的平均变化显著更大,在第8周时,喘息(p = 0.01)、气短(p = 0.02)、胸闷(p < 0.01)以及每日哮喘症状(p = 0.03)较基线的平均变化显著更大。每组不良事件的发生率、类型和严重程度相似。在第8周时,一组患者校正尿皮质醇/肌酐比值较基线的平均变化,HFA-BDP组为 -0.36,BUD TH组为 -4.88(p < 0.01)。

结论

HFA-BDP 800微克/天可有效控制中重度哮喘,其疗效和安全性至少与BUD TH 1600微克/天相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验