Delvaux Ellen, Meeussen Loes, Mesquita Batja
a Center for Social and Cultural Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences , University of Leuven , Leuven , Belgium.
Cogn Emot. 2016;30(1):101-16. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1018143. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
The members of task groups are emotionally more similar to each other than to others outside the group; yet, little is known about the conditions under which this emotional similarity emerges. In two longitudinal studies, we tested the idea that emotions only spread when they contain information that is relevant to all group members. We compared the spreading of group pride (relevant) with self-pride (not relevant). The first study followed emotions in 68 task groups (N = 295) across 4 moments. Multilevel cross-lagged path analyses showed that group members mutually influenced each other's group pride, but not self-pride. The second study followed emotions in 27 task groups (N = 195) across 3 moments in time. Longitudinal social network analyses showed that group members adjusted their group pride, but not their self-pride, to members they perceived to be more influential. Findings from both studies are consistent with a social referencing account of emotion spreading.
任务小组的成员在情感上彼此之间比与小组之外的其他人更为相似;然而,对于这种情感相似性出现的条件却知之甚少。在两项纵向研究中,我们检验了这样一种观点,即情绪只有在包含与所有小组成员相关的信息时才会传播。我们比较了群体自豪感(相关)和自我自豪感(不相关)的传播情况。第一项研究在4个时间点对68个任务小组(N = 295)中的情绪进行了跟踪。多层次交叉滞后路径分析表明,小组成员相互影响彼此的群体自豪感,但不影响自我自豪感。第二项研究在3个时间点对27个任务小组(N = 195)中的情绪进行了跟踪。纵向社会网络分析表明,小组成员会根据他们认为更有影响力的成员来调整自己的群体自豪感,而不是自我自豪感。两项研究的结果都与情绪传播的社会参照理论相一致。