Elliman A M, Bryan E M, Elliman A D, Palmer P, Dubowitz L
Arch Dis Child. 1985 Jan;60(1):20-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.60.1.20.
The results of Denver developmental screening test and Griffiths mental development scales examination performed on 198 preterm children during the first three years of life and compared. Using real age the former identified children with developmental delay, but labelled up to 42% of babies as having questionable or abnormal development. Using corrected age very few children showed less than normal development, and in the first year those whose Griffiths scales results showed delay were often assessed as normal by the Denver test. In view of its less satisfactory sensitivity and selectivity it is suggested that both age lines should be drawn when using the Denver test with preterm children so that undue anxiety can be allayed while appropriate action is taken to ensure adequate follow up.
对198名早产儿童在其生命的头三年进行了丹佛发育筛查测试和格里菲斯心理发展量表检查,并对结果进行了比较。以前者使用实际年龄来确定发育迟缓的儿童,但将多达42%的婴儿标记为发育可疑或异常。使用矫正年龄时,很少有儿童显示出发育低于正常水平,并且在第一年,那些格里菲斯量表结果显示发育迟缓的儿童经常被丹佛测试评估为正常。鉴于其敏感性和选择性不太令人满意,建议在对早产儿童使用丹佛测试时应同时画出两条年龄线,以便在采取适当行动确保充分随访的同时减轻不必要的焦虑。