Heinemann Lutz, Khatami Hootan, McKinnon Ross, Home Philip
1 Science & Co. , Düsseldorf, Germany .
2 Sanofi , Bridgewater, New Jersey.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Jul;17(7):510-26. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0362. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
Insulin analog patent expiry is likely to mean that, increasingly, copies of original biopharmaceutical products will be submitted for authorization. Experience with biosimilars in other therapeutic areas suggests that careful regulation and caution are needed. Published guidelines of regulatory authorities around the world on approval of biosimilars and, where available, insulin biosimilars were reviewed. Information was sourced through Internet searching and cross-referencing guidelines. As of August 2014, general biosimilar and insulin-specific guidelines are available in 34 countries and two countries/regulatory domains, respectively. Many guidelines are clearly related to, or partly derived from, the general and insulin-specific European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines. Areas covered by these guidelines are fairly consistent, covering preclinical, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) studies in humans and clinical areas; however, there are differences in emphasis. The EMA insulin-specific guidelines include detailed criteria on PK/PD studies, as do most other general biosimilar guidelines and, to a lesser extent, clinical studies. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has general biosimilar guidelines, emphasizing consideration of the whole package of in vitro, biological, and human studies, rather than concentrating on any one aspect. In countries such as Mexico, guidelines are broad, leaving wide discretion to the regulatory authority. In conclusion, from a global perspective, this area of drug regulation is heterogeneous and evolving, and the authors call for an initiative aimed at harmonizing the requirements for biosimilar insulins.
胰岛素类似物专利到期可能意味着越来越多的原创生物制药产品仿制品将提交审批。其他治疗领域生物类似药的经验表明,需要进行严格监管并保持谨慎。我们对全球监管机构发布的生物类似药审批指南以及(如有)胰岛素生物类似药审批指南进行了审查。信息来源是通过互联网搜索和交叉引用指南。截至2014年8月,分别有34个国家和两个国家/监管领域发布了一般生物类似药指南和胰岛素专项指南。许多指南明显与欧洲药品管理局(EMA)的一般指南和胰岛素专项指南相关,或部分源自这些指南。这些指南涵盖的领域相当一致,包括人体临床前、药代动力学(PK)和药效学(PD)研究以及临床领域;然而,重点存在差异。EMA的胰岛素专项指南包括PK/PD研究的详细标准,大多数其他一般生物类似药指南也是如此,临床研究方面的标准程度稍低。美国食品药品监督管理局有一般生物类似药指南,强调要综合考虑体外、生物学和人体研究的整体情况,而不是专注于任何一个方面。在墨西哥等国家,指南较为宽泛,赋予监管机构很大的自由裁量权。总之,从全球角度来看,这一药物监管领域是异质且不断发展的,作者呼吁发起一项旨在统一胰岛素生物类似药要求的倡议。