Golden Sara E, Wiener Renda Soylemez, Sullivan Donald, Ganzini Linda, Slatore Christopher G
From the Health Services Research and Development, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial VA Hospital, Bedford, MA; The Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Chest. 2015 Dec;148(6):1422-1429. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-2938.
As lung cancer screening with low-dose CT scanning is implemented, an increasing number of people will be diagnosed with pulmonary nodules. Primary care clinicians care for the vast majority of these patients, but their experiences with communication and managing distress in this population are not well understood.
We conducted qualitative interviews of 15 primary care providers (PCPs) at two academic medical centers who care for patients with pulmonary nodules. We used qualitative description analysis, focusing on clinicians' information exchange and other communication behaviors.
Most PCPs believed they had inadequate information to counsel patients regarding lung nodules, although this information is desired. PCPs were concerned patients could "fall through the cracks" but did not have access to a reliable system to ensure follow-up adherence. They were limited by time, knowledge, and resources in providing the preferred level of care. Most PCPs did not discuss the specific risk a nodule was lung cancer, in part because they did not have ready access to this information. PCPs believed most patients did not have substantial distress as a result of nodule detection. Most PCPs did not include patients when making decisions about the follow-up plan.
PCPs often lack systemic resources to optimize patient-centered approaches when discussing incidental pulmonary nodules with patients. With the advent of lung cancer screening, pulmonologists can assist primary care colleagues by providing accurate information to counsel patients and assisting in managing conversations about the risk of cancer. Pulmonologists should support efforts to implement reliable systems to ensure adherence to follow-up.
随着低剂量CT扫描用于肺癌筛查的实施,越来越多的人将被诊断出患有肺结节。基层医疗临床医生负责照顾这些患者中的绝大多数,但他们在与这一人群沟通及处理其困扰方面的经验尚不清楚。
我们对两个学术医疗中心的15名照顾肺结节患者的基层医疗提供者(PCP)进行了定性访谈。我们采用定性描述分析,重点关注临床医生的信息交流及其他沟通行为。
大多数PCP认为他们在为患者提供有关肺结节的咨询时信息不足,尽管患者需要此类信息。PCP担心患者可能“被遗漏”,但没有可靠的系统来确保后续的依从性。他们在提供理想水平的护理时受到时间、知识和资源的限制。大多数PCP没有讨论结节是肺癌的具体风险,部分原因是他们无法随时获取此类信息。PCP认为大多数患者并未因发现结节而产生严重困扰。大多数PCP在制定后续计划的决策时没有让患者参与。
在与患者讨论偶然发现的肺结节时,PCP通常缺乏系统资源来优化以患者为中心的方法。随着肺癌筛查的出现,肺科医生可以通过提供准确信息来帮助基层医疗同事为患者提供咨询,并协助管理有关癌症风险的对话。肺科医生应支持实施可靠系统以确保后续依从性的努力。