• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机对照试验中金属支架缓解肝外胆管梗阻的成本效果分析。

Cost Efficacy of Metal Stents for Palliation of Extrahepatic Bile Duct Obstruction in a Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Gastroenterology. 2015 Jul;149(1):130-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.012. Epub 2015 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.012
PMID:
25790742
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopic stents are placed for palliation of extrahepatic bile duct obstruction. Although self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) remain patent longer than plastic stents, they are more expensive. We aimed to evaluate which type of stent (plastic, uncovered SEMS [uSEMS], or partially covered SEMS [pcSEMS]) is the most effective and we assessed costs.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter randomized trial in 219 patients at 18 hospitals in The Netherlands from February 2008 through February 2013. Patients were assigned randomly for placement of a plastic stent (n = 73), uSEMS (n = 75), or pcSEMS (n = 71) during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Patients were followed up for up to 1 year. Researchers were not blinded to groups. The main study end points included functional stent time and costs.

RESULTS

The mean functional stent times were 172 days for plastic stents, 288 days for uSEMS, and 299 days for pcSEMS (P < .005 for uSEMS and pcSEMS vs plastic). The initial placement of plastic stents (€1042 or $1106) cost significantly less than placement of SEMS (€1973 or $2094) (P = .001). However, the total cost per patient at the end of the follow-up period did not differ significantly between plastic stents (€7320 or $7770) and SEMS (€6932 or $7356) (P = .61). Furthermore, in patients with short survival times (≤3 mo) or metastatic disease, the total cost per patient did not differ between plastic stents and SEMS. No differences in costs were found between pcSEMS and uSEMS.

CONCLUSIONS

Although placement of SEMS (uncovered or partially covered) for palliation of extrahepatic bile duct obstruction initially is more expensive than placement of plastic stents, SEMS have longer functional time. The total costs after 1 year do not differ significantly with stent type. Dutch Clinical Trial Registration no: NTR1361.

摘要

背景与目的

内镜支架用于缓解肝外胆管阻塞。虽然自膨式金属支架(SEMS)比塑料支架保持通畅的时间更长,但价格也更昂贵。我们旨在评估哪种类型的支架(塑料、无覆膜 SEMS[uSEMS]或部分覆膜 SEMS[pcSEMS])更有效,并评估成本。

方法

我们在 2008 年 2 月至 2013 年 2 月期间在荷兰的 18 家医院进行了一项多中心随机试验,共有 219 名患者参与。患者随机接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术下置入塑料支架(n=73)、uSEMS(n=75)或 pcSEMS(n=71)。患者随访时间最长为 1 年。研究人员未对组进行盲法。主要研究终点包括功能支架时间和成本。

结果

塑料支架的平均功能支架时间为 172 天,uSEMS 为 288 天,pcSEMS 为 299 天(uSEMS 和 pcSEMS 与塑料支架相比,P<0.005)。塑料支架的初始置入费用(€1042 或$1106)明显低于 SEMS(€1973 或$2094)(P=0.001)。然而,在随访期末,每位患者的总费用在塑料支架(€7320 或$7770)和 SEMS(€6932 或$7356)之间无显著差异(P=0.61)。此外,在生存时间短(≤3 个月)或转移性疾病的患者中,塑料支架和 SEMS 之间每位患者的总费用无差异。pcSEMS 和 uSEMS 之间的成本差异无统计学意义。

结论

虽然用于缓解肝外胆管阻塞的 SEMS(无覆膜或部分覆膜)的置入最初比塑料支架更昂贵,但 SEMS 的功能时间更长。1 年后,支架类型的总费用无显著差异。荷兰临床试验注册号:NTR1361。

相似文献

1
Cost Efficacy of Metal Stents for Palliation of Extrahepatic Bile Duct Obstruction in a Randomized Controlled Trial.随机对照试验中金属支架缓解肝外胆管梗阻的成本效果分析。
Gastroenterology. 2015 Jul;149(1):130-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.012. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
2
Higher quality of life after metal stent placement compared with plastic stent placement for malignant extrahepatic bile duct obstruction: a randomized controlled trial.金属支架置入术与塑料支架置入术治疗恶性肝外胆管梗阻的生活质量比较:一项随机对照试验
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Feb;29(2):231-237. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000762.
3
Cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of biliary stents in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a randomized controlled trial.一项随机对照试验中,胆管支架在接受胰腺癌新辅助治疗患者中的成本效益和临床疗效
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Sep;84(3):460-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.047. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
4
Covered metal versus plastic stents for malignant common bile duct stenosis: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.覆膜金属支架与塑料支架治疗恶性胆总管狭窄的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Jun;63(7):986-95. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.11.052.
5
Covered self-expandable metal stents with an anti-migration system improve patency duration without increased complications compared with uncovered stents for distal biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic carcinoma: a randomized multicenter trial.带防迁移系统的覆膜自膨式金属支架与未覆膜支架相比,可改善因胰腺癌导致的远端胆道梗阻的通畅时间,而不增加并发症:一项随机多中心试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov;108(11):1713-22. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.305. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
6
Covered and uncovered self-expandable metallic Hanarostents are equally efficacious in the drainage of extrahepatic malignant strictures. Results of a double-blind randomized study.覆膜与非覆膜自膨式金属Hanaro支架在肝外恶性狭窄引流中疗效相当。一项双盲随机研究的结果
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013 Apr;48(4):459-65. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2012.758766. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
7
Metallic stent deployment in endosonography-guided biliary drainage: long-term follow-up results in patients with bilio-enteric anastomosis.经内镜超声引导胆道引流中金属支架的放置:胆肠吻合患者的长期随访结果。
Dig Endosc. 2012 Nov;24(6):457-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01316.x. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
8
Covered versus uncovered self-expandable metal stent for palliation of primary malignant extrahepatic biliary strictures: a randomized multicenter study.覆膜与非覆膜自膨式金属支架治疗原发性肝外恶性胆道狭窄的随机多中心研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Aug;88(2):283-291.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.03.029. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
9
A prospective randomized study comparing partially covered metal stent versus plastic multistent in the endoscopic management of patients with postoperative benign bile duct strictures: a follow-up above 5 years.一项比较部分覆膜金属支架与塑料多支架在内镜治疗术后良性胆管狭窄患者中的前瞻性随机研究:5年以上随访
Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2012 Jan-Mar;32(1):26-31.
10
Reintervention for occluded metal stent in malignant bile duct obstruction: A prospective randomized trial comparing covered and uncovered metal stent.恶性胆管梗阻中闭塞金属支架的再次干预:一项比较覆膜和非覆膜金属支架的前瞻性随机试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Nov;31(11):1901-1907. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13392.

引用本文的文献

1
The Palliation of Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: Evolution from Surgery to Minimally Invasive Modalities.不可切除胰腺癌的姑息治疗:从手术到微创方式的演变
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 15;14(14):4997. doi: 10.3390/jcm14144997.
2
The past, present, and future of endoscopic management for biliary strictures: technological innovations and stent advancements.胆管狭窄内镜治疗的过去、现在与未来:技术创新与支架进展
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Nov 28;11:1334154. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1334154. eCollection 2024.
3
Role of endoscopic-ultrasound-guided biliary drainage with electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent for palliation of malignant biliary obstruction.
内镜超声引导下使用电灼增强管腔贴合金属支架进行胆道引流在恶性胆道梗阻姑息治疗中的作用
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jul 27;16(7):1981-1985. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.1981.
4
Endoscopic management of malignant biliary obstructions.恶性胆管梗阻的内镜治疗
Ann Gastroenterol. 2024 May-Jun;37(3):291-302. doi: 10.20524/aog.2024.0883. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
5
Efficacy of multi-hole self-expandable metal stent compared to fully covered and uncovered self-expandable metal stents in patients with unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction: a propensity analysis.多孔自膨式金属支架与全覆膜和无覆膜自膨式金属支架治疗不可切除性恶性远端胆管梗阻患者的疗效比较:一项倾向分析
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jan;38(1):212-221. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10541-9. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
6
APRI and FIB-4 indices as diagnostic noninvasive scores for prediction of severe fibrosis in patients with biliary atresia.APRI和FIB-4指数作为诊断非侵入性评分用于预测胆道闭锁患者的严重纤维化。
Clin Exp Hepatol. 2023 Sep;9(3):251-264. doi: 10.5114/ceh.2023.130699. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
7
Endoscopic workup in pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌的内镜检查
Int J Surg. 2024 Oct 1;110(10):6064-6069. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000777.
8
Short and long outcomes of endoscopic bilateral metal stent placement for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: Tertiary care oncology centre experience.内镜下双侧金属支架置入治疗恶性肝门部胆管梗阻的短期和长期疗效:三级肿瘤治疗中心的经验。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jun;42(3):396-403. doi: 10.1007/s12664-022-01337-1. Epub 2023 May 18.
9
Comparison of therapeutic efficacy and treatment costs of self-expandable metal stents and plastic stents for management of malignant biliary obstruction.自膨式金属支架和塑料支架治疗恶性胆道梗阻的疗效和治疗费用比较。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Feb 16;23(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02668-9.
10
Potential significance of uncovered self-expandable metal stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction: A propensity score-adjusted competing risk regression analysis.未覆盖自膨式金属支架治疗远端恶性胆管梗阻的潜在意义:倾向评分调整的竞争风险回归分析
DEN Open. 2022 Sep 20;3(1):e166. doi: 10.1002/deo2.166. eCollection 2023 Apr.