Suppr超能文献

随机对照试验中金属支架缓解肝外胆管梗阻的成本效果分析。

Cost Efficacy of Metal Stents for Palliation of Extrahepatic Bile Duct Obstruction in a Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Gastroenterology. 2015 Jul;149(1):130-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.012. Epub 2015 Mar 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopic stents are placed for palliation of extrahepatic bile duct obstruction. Although self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) remain patent longer than plastic stents, they are more expensive. We aimed to evaluate which type of stent (plastic, uncovered SEMS [uSEMS], or partially covered SEMS [pcSEMS]) is the most effective and we assessed costs.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter randomized trial in 219 patients at 18 hospitals in The Netherlands from February 2008 through February 2013. Patients were assigned randomly for placement of a plastic stent (n = 73), uSEMS (n = 75), or pcSEMS (n = 71) during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Patients were followed up for up to 1 year. Researchers were not blinded to groups. The main study end points included functional stent time and costs.

RESULTS

The mean functional stent times were 172 days for plastic stents, 288 days for uSEMS, and 299 days for pcSEMS (P < .005 for uSEMS and pcSEMS vs plastic). The initial placement of plastic stents (€1042 or $1106) cost significantly less than placement of SEMS (€1973 or $2094) (P = .001). However, the total cost per patient at the end of the follow-up period did not differ significantly between plastic stents (€7320 or $7770) and SEMS (€6932 or $7356) (P = .61). Furthermore, in patients with short survival times (≤3 mo) or metastatic disease, the total cost per patient did not differ between plastic stents and SEMS. No differences in costs were found between pcSEMS and uSEMS.

CONCLUSIONS

Although placement of SEMS (uncovered or partially covered) for palliation of extrahepatic bile duct obstruction initially is more expensive than placement of plastic stents, SEMS have longer functional time. The total costs after 1 year do not differ significantly with stent type. Dutch Clinical Trial Registration no: NTR1361.

摘要

背景与目的

内镜支架用于缓解肝外胆管阻塞。虽然自膨式金属支架(SEMS)比塑料支架保持通畅的时间更长,但价格也更昂贵。我们旨在评估哪种类型的支架(塑料、无覆膜 SEMS[uSEMS]或部分覆膜 SEMS[pcSEMS])更有效,并评估成本。

方法

我们在 2008 年 2 月至 2013 年 2 月期间在荷兰的 18 家医院进行了一项多中心随机试验,共有 219 名患者参与。患者随机接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术下置入塑料支架(n=73)、uSEMS(n=75)或 pcSEMS(n=71)。患者随访时间最长为 1 年。研究人员未对组进行盲法。主要研究终点包括功能支架时间和成本。

结果

塑料支架的平均功能支架时间为 172 天,uSEMS 为 288 天,pcSEMS 为 299 天(uSEMS 和 pcSEMS 与塑料支架相比,P<0.005)。塑料支架的初始置入费用(€1042 或$1106)明显低于 SEMS(€1973 或$2094)(P=0.001)。然而,在随访期末,每位患者的总费用在塑料支架(€7320 或$7770)和 SEMS(€6932 或$7356)之间无显著差异(P=0.61)。此外,在生存时间短(≤3 个月)或转移性疾病的患者中,塑料支架和 SEMS 之间每位患者的总费用无差异。pcSEMS 和 uSEMS 之间的成本差异无统计学意义。

结论

虽然用于缓解肝外胆管阻塞的 SEMS(无覆膜或部分覆膜)的置入最初比塑料支架更昂贵,但 SEMS 的功能时间更长。1 年后,支架类型的总费用无显著差异。荷兰临床试验注册号:NTR1361。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验