Suppr超能文献

覆膜与非覆膜自膨式金属支架治疗原发性肝外恶性胆道狭窄的随机多中心研究。

Covered versus uncovered self-expandable metal stent for palliation of primary malignant extrahepatic biliary strictures: a randomized multicenter study.

机构信息

Gastroenterology Department, General Hospital, Sanremo (IM).

Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena, Sant'Agostino Estense Hospital, Baggiovara (MO).

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Aug;88(2):283-291.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.03.029. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are used to relieve malignant biliary obstructions. We aimed to compare stent patency, the adverse events rate, and overall survival of covered versus uncovered self-conformable metal stents in patients with primary malignant extrahepatic biliary strictures, not eligible for surgery.

METHODS

This is a multicenter randomized trial analyzing 158 patients with inoperable distal malignant biliary obstruction conducted in 5 Italian referral centers between December 2014 and October 2016. Seventy-eight patients were randomized to receive a fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS), and 80 patients received uncovered SEMSs (USEMSs). Data from 148 (72 FCSEMSs and 76 USEMSs) of 158 patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Median time of stent patency was lower for FCSEMSs (240 days vs 541 days for USEMSs; P = .031). Adverse events occurred with 19 FCSEMSs (26.4%) and 10 USEMSs (13.2%); P = .061. The main causes of FCSEMS dysfunction were migration (7% vs 0% in the USEMS group) and early occlusion mainly because of sludge or overgrowth; late stent occlusion because of tumor ingrowth occurred in 13.2% of patients in the USEMS group. There were no significant differences either in levels of conjugated bilirubin improvement or in overall survival between the FCSEMS and USEMS groups. Median survival was 134 days in the FCSEMS group and 112 days in the USEMS group (P = .23).

CONCLUSION

The number of stent-related adverse events was higher, although not significantly, among patients in the FCSEMS group. FCSEMSs had a significantly higher rate of migration than USEMSs, and stent occlusion occurred earlier. A significant difference in the patency rate was observed in favor of the USEMS group. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02102984.).

摘要

背景与目的

自膨式金属支架(SEMS)用于缓解恶性胆道梗阻。我们旨在比较不可切除的原发性肝外恶性胆道狭窄患者中使用覆膜与非覆膜自顺应性金属支架的支架通畅率、不良事件发生率和总生存率。

方法

这是一项多中心随机试验,分析了 2014 年 12 月至 2016 年 10 月在意大利 5 个转诊中心进行的 158 例不可切除的远端恶性胆道梗阻患者的数据。78 例患者随机接受完全覆膜 SEMS(FCSEMS),80 例患者接受非覆膜 SEMS(USEMS)。对 158 例患者中的 148 例(72 例 FCSEMS 和 76 例 USEMS)进行了数据分析。

结果

FCSEMS 的中位支架通畅时间较短(240 天比 USEMS 的 541 天;P=0.031)。FCSEMS 组发生 19 例(26.4%)和 USEMS 组 10 例(13.2%)不良事件;P=0.061。FCSEMS 功能障碍的主要原因是迁移(7%比 USEMS 组 0%)和早期闭塞,主要是由于淤泥或过度生长;USEMS 组中有 13.2%的患者发生晚期支架闭塞,原因是肿瘤向内生长。FCSEMS 和 USEMS 组之间的结合胆红素改善水平或总生存率均无显著差异。FCSEMS 组的中位生存时间为 134 天,USEMS 组为 112 天(P=0.23)。

结论

FCSEMS 组的支架相关不良事件发生率虽然不高,但较高。FCSEMS 组的迁移率明显高于 USEMS 组,支架闭塞发生较早。支架通畅率观察到有利于 USEMS 组的显著差异。(临床试验注册号:NCT02102984)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验