• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一款4.5毫米宽骨锚式听力植入物的稳定性、存活率及耐受性:来自一项随机对照临床试验的6个月数据。

Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial.

作者信息

Nelissen Rik C, den Besten Christine A, Mylanus Emmanuel A M, Hol Myrthe K S

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jan;273(1):105-11. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3593-x. Epub 2015 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00405-015-3593-x
PMID:25790770
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4705128/
Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the stability, survival, and tolerability of 2 percutaneous osseointegrated titanium implants for bone conduction hearing: a 4.5-mm diameter implant (test) and a 3.75-mm diameter implant (control). Fifty-seven adult patients were included in this randomized controlled clinical trial. Sixty implants were allocated in a 2:1 (test-control) ratio. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days; 6 and 12 weeks; and 6 months. At every visit, implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were recorded by means of resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and skin reactions were evaluated according to the Holgers classification. Implants were loaded with the bone conduction device at 3 weeks. Hearing-related quality of life was evaluated using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI), and the Glasgow Health Status Inventory (GHSI). ISQ values were statistically significantly higher for the test implant compared to the control implant. No implants were lost and soft tissue reactions were comparable for both implants. Positive results were reported in the hearing-related quality of life questionnaires. These 6-month results indicate that both implants and their corresponding hearing devices are safe options for hearing rehabilitation in patients with the appropriate indications. Loading at 3 weeks did not affect the stability of either implant.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较两种用于骨传导听力的经皮骨整合钛植入物的稳定性、存活率和耐受性:一种直径为4.5毫米的植入物(试验组)和一种直径为3.75毫米的植入物(对照组)。57名成年患者纳入了这项随机对照临床试验。60枚植入物按2:1(试验组-对照组)的比例分配。随访安排在第7、14、21和28天;6周和12周;以及6个月。每次随访时,通过共振频率分析(RFA)记录植入物稳定性商(ISQ)值,并根据霍尔格斯分类法评估皮肤反应。在3周时给植入物佩戴骨传导装置。使用助听器益处简表(APHAB)、格拉斯哥益处量表(GBI)和格拉斯哥健康状况量表(GHSI)评估听力相关生活质量。试验组植入物的ISQ值在统计学上显著高于对照组植入物。没有植入物丢失,两种植入物的软组织反应相当。听力相关生活质量问卷报告了阳性结果。这些6个月的结果表明,对于有适当适应症的患者,两种植入物及其相应的听力装置都是听力康复的安全选择。3周时佩戴装置并未影响任何一种植入物的稳定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ce9/4705128/60b888a5ba1f/405_2015_3593_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ce9/4705128/96654d0fc463/405_2015_3593_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ce9/4705128/03dba0f01649/405_2015_3593_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ce9/4705128/e84d78bd9577/405_2015_3593_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ce9/4705128/60b888a5ba1f/405_2015_3593_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ce9/4705128/96654d0fc463/405_2015_3593_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ce9/4705128/03dba0f01649/405_2015_3593_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ce9/4705128/e84d78bd9577/405_2015_3593_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ce9/4705128/60b888a5ba1f/405_2015_3593_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial.一款4.5毫米宽骨锚式听力植入物的稳定性、存活率及耐受性:来自一项随机对照临床试验的6个月数据。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jan;273(1):105-11. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3593-x. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
2
Loading of osseointegrated implants for bone conduction hearing at 3 weeks: 3-year stability, survival, and tolerability.骨整合植入物用于骨传导听力在3周时的负荷:3年稳定性、存活率及耐受性
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jul;273(7):1731-7. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3746-y. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
3
Long-term stability, survival, and tolerability of a novel osseointegrated implant for bone conduction hearing: 3-year data from a multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical investigation.一种用于骨传导听力的新型骨整合植入物的长期稳定性、存活率和耐受性:一项多中心、随机、对照临床研究的3年数据。
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Sep;35(8):1486-91. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000533.
4
Three-year Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a 4.5-mm-Wide to a 3.75-mm-Wide Titanium Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing.骨导式听力 4.5mm 宽钛植入物与 3.75mm 宽钛植入物随机对照试验的 3 年结果
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Jun;39(5):609-615. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001761.
5
Bone-anchored hearing implant loading at 3 weeks: stability and tolerability after 6 months.骨锚式听力植入物 3 周加载:6 个月后的稳定性和耐受性。
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Jan;34(1):104-10. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318277a282.
6
Stability, Survival, and Tolerability of an Auditory Osseointegrated Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.用于骨传导听力的听觉骨整合植入物的稳定性、存活率和耐受性:一项随机对照试验的长期随访
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Sep;37(8):1077-83. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001111.
7
Three-week loading of the 4.5mm wide titanium implant in bone anchored hearing systems.在骨锚式听力系统中对4.5毫米宽的钛植入物进行为期三周的加载。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2016 Mar-Apr;37(2):132-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
8
Clinical evaluation and resonance frequency analysis of laser-ablated titanium bone-anchored hearing implant system in children with Down Syndrome.唐氏综合征患儿激光消融钛骨锚式听力植入系统的临床评估与共振频率分析
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Dec;151:110981. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110981. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
9
A new wide-diameter bone-anchored hearing implant-prospective 1-year data on complications, implant stability, and survival.一种新型大直径骨锚式听力植入物——关于并发症、植入稳定性和存活率的1年前瞻性数据。
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Aug;35(7):1238-41. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000345.
10
Wide diameter bone-anchored hearing system implants: a comparison of long-term follow-up data between tissue reduction and tissue preservation techniques.宽直径骨锚式听力系统植入物:组织减容与组织保留技术的长期随访数据比较
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Feb;276(2):349-356. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5228-5. Epub 2018 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of BCDs in Unilateral Conductive Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.骨传导装置在单侧传导性听力损失中的作用:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 11;12(18):5901. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185901.
2
Prospective 5 year outcomes of different implant designs and surgical techniques in 68 patients with bone anchored hearing implants.68例骨锚式听力植入患者中不同植入物设计和手术技术的5年前瞻性结果。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2023 Jan;48(1):65-69. doi: 10.1111/coa.13974. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
3
Achieving stomal continence with an ileal pouch and a percutaneous implant.

本文引用的文献

1
Successful loading of a bone-anchored hearing implant at two weeks after surgery: randomized trial of two surgical methods and detailed stability measurements.骨锚式听力植入物术后两周成功植入:两种手术方法的随机试验及详细稳定性测量
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Feb;36(2):e51-7. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000647.
2
Long-term stability, survival, and tolerability of a novel osseointegrated implant for bone conduction hearing: 3-year data from a multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical investigation.一种用于骨传导听力的新型骨整合植入物的长期稳定性、存活率和耐受性:一项多中心、随机、对照临床研究的3年数据。
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Sep;35(8):1486-91. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000533.
3
实现带皮穿刺植入物的回肠袋肛门控便。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2022 Jan 4;33(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s10856-021-06633-4.
4
A Miniature, Fiber-Optic Vibrometer for Measuring Unintended Acoustic Output of Active Hearing Implants during Magnetic Resonance Imaging.一种微型光纤测振仪,用于测量磁共振成像期间主动植入式听觉设备的非预期声学输出。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Oct 2;21(19):6589. doi: 10.3390/s21196589.
5
Patient Preferences in Sound Processor Loading Time After BAHI Surgery.患者对 BAHI 手术后声音处理器加载时间的偏好。
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Aug;41(7):934-939. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002697.
6
Ten years of experience with the Ponto bone-anchored hearing system-A systematic literature review.十年的 Ponto 骨锚式听力系统应用经验——系统文献回顾。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2020 Sep;45(5):667-680. doi: 10.1111/coa.13556. Epub 2020 May 25.
7
A Multinational Cost-Consequence Analysis of a Bone Conduction Hearing Implant System-A Randomized Trial of a Conventional vs. a Less Invasive Treatment With New Abutment Technology.骨传导听力植入系统的多国成本效益分析——传统治疗与采用新型基台技术的微创治疗的随机试验
Front Neurol. 2020 Mar 13;11:106. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00106. eCollection 2020.
8
Long-term soft tissue outcomes for hydroxyapatite-coated bone-anchored hearing implant surgery.羟基磷灰石涂层骨锚式听力植入手术的长期软组织转归。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Nov;276(11):3067-3072. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05609-z. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
9
Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery Versus the Linear Incision Technique With Soft Tissue Preservation for Bone Conduction Hearing Implants: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.微创耳后入路与保留软组织的直线切口技术在骨导式助听植入中的应用:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Aug;39(7):882-893. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001852.
10
Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: linear incision technique with tissue preservation versus linear incision technique with tissue reduction.经皮骨锚定式听力植入手术:保留组织的直线切口技术与组织减少的直线切口技术比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jul;275(7):1737-1747. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5005-5. Epub 2018 May 30.
Implant losses for the bone-anchored hearing devices are more frequent in some patients.
骨锚式听力装置在某些患者中植入物丢失的情况更为常见。
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Feb;36(2):336-40. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000446.
4
Initial experience of a rapid-insertion bone-anchored hearing system: series of 20 consecutive implants.快速植入式骨锚式听力系统的初步经验:连续20例植入病例系列
J Laryngol Otol. 2014 Apr;128(4):326-330. doi: 10.1017/S002221511400067X.
5
A new wide-diameter bone-anchored hearing implant-prospective 1-year data on complications, implant stability, and survival.一种新型大直径骨锚式听力植入物——关于并发症、植入稳定性和存活率的1年前瞻性数据。
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Aug;35(7):1238-41. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000345.
6
Evaluation of a new powerful bone-anchored hearing system: a comparison study.一种新型强大骨锚式听力系统的评估:一项比较研究。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Jun;24(6):505-13. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.6.6.
7
A meta-analysis of the complications associated with osseointegrated hearing aids.骨整合式助听设备相关并发症的荟萃分析。
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Jul;34(5):790-4. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318291c651.
8
A new bone-anchored hearing implant: short-term retrospective data on implant survival and subjective benefit.新型骨锚式听力植入物:植入体存活率和主观获益的短期回顾性数据。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Nov;270(12):3019-25. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2346-y. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
9
Bone-anchored hearing implant loading at 3 weeks: stability and tolerability after 6 months.骨锚式听力植入物 3 周加载:6 个月后的稳定性和耐受性。
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Jan;34(1):104-10. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318277a282.
10
Evidence for early loading of osseointegrated implants for bone conduction at 4 weeks.骨导式种植体 4 周时早期负载的证据。
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Dec;33(9):1578-82. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31826dba5f.