Krieger C, Stephan D, Aleil B
Service hypertension, maladies vasculaires et pharmacologie clinique, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67091 Strasbourg cedex, France.
Service hypertension, maladies vasculaires et pharmacologie clinique, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67091 Strasbourg cedex, France; Faculté de médecine, université de Strasbourg, 4, rue Kirschleger, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2015 Apr;64(2):68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
The new direct oral anticoagulants (DOA) such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban are an evolution in the management of patients requiring curative anticoagulation. However, behind the simplicity of prescribing and monitoring, several questions remain about their daily use. The aim of this prospective study was to measure the feelings of general practitioners (GP), angiologists (AP) and cardiologists (CP), potential prescribers of this new anticoagulant family.
Between December 2012 and May 2013, a questionnaire including five open questions and 11 questions using a positioning on an analogic visual scale (AVS 0 to 10) was subjected to GP, AP and CP in Alsace.
Responses from 224 physicians (150 GP, 35 AP and 39 CP) were collected. Thus, 83% of GP, 83% of AP and 100% of CP were prescribers of DOA. However, among these prescribing doctors, the feeling was not the same and the trend of prescription was lower in GP (2.0 [1.1-3.2] AVS units) than in AP (3.1 [2.0-5.6]) and in CP (5.0 [1.2-8.7]) (P<0.0001 in multivariate analysis). The female doctors tended to prescribe DOA in younger patients than male doctors (respectively 66.1 [52.5-76.7] vs. 75.0 [65.7-81.0] years; P=0.004). The DOA were more considered as progress by AP and CP (respectively 7.8 [5.3-9.0] and 7.9 [7.0-8.7] AVSu) than by GP (6.1 [4.8-8.2] AVSu; P=0.02 in multivariate analysis). The answer about the eventual replacement of vitamin K antagonists by the DOA was very mixed whatever the practitioner group (5.1 [3.0-7.8] AVSu; P=0.139). The ease to use and the lack of biological monitoring were the main arguments leading to the prescription but the attitude of practitioners was very balanced by the lack of experience on the bleeding risk and the lack of available antidote.
If the DOA are considered as an improvement for the physicians, the enthusiasm remains cautious whatever the type of practiced medicine. The results of clinical trials and the clinical experience should better appreciate the ongoing change in the field of anticoagulation.
新型直接口服抗凝剂(DOA),如达比加群、利伐沙班或阿哌沙班,是抗凝治疗领域的一项进展。然而,在处方开具和监测的简便性背后,其日常使用仍存在一些问题。这项前瞻性研究的目的是了解全科医生(GP)、血管病专家(AP)和心脏病专家(CP)这些新型抗凝剂潜在处方者的看法。
2012年12月至2013年5月期间,向阿尔萨斯地区的全科医生、血管病专家和心脏病专家发放了一份问卷,其中包括五个开放式问题以及11个采用类似视觉量表(AVS 0至10)进行定位的问题。
共收集到224名医生(150名全科医生、35名血管病专家和39名心脏病专家)的回复。其中,83%的全科医生、83%的血管病专家和100%的心脏病专家开具过DOA。然而,在这些开具处方的医生中,他们的感受并不相同,全科医生的处方开具倾向(2.0 [1.1 - 3.2] AVS单位)低于血管病专家(3.1 [