• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国胃癌患者的化疗治疗模式、成本及治疗结果:电子病历(EMR)与行政索赔数据的回顾性分析

Chemotherapy treatment patterns, costs, and outcomes of patients with gastric cancer in the United States: a retrospective analysis of electronic medical record (EMR) and administrative claims data.

作者信息

Hess Lisa M, Michael Diane, Mytelka Daniel S, Beyrer Julie, Liepa Astra M, Nicol Steven

机构信息

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.

出版信息

Gastric Cancer. 2016 Apr;19(2):607-615. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0486-z. Epub 2015 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1007/s10120-015-0486-z
PMID:25792290
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4824832/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to conduct a retrospective database analysis to describe the chemotherapy treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

Individuals diagnosed with gastric cancer were identified from the IMS Oncology Database, which contains electronic medical record (EMR) data collected from a variety of community practices, and the Truven Health MarketScan(®) Research database, an administrative claims database. Eligible patients were 18 years of age or older and had an ICD-9 code 151.0-151.9. Patients were excluded if they had evidence of cancer within 6 months of the index diagnosis.

RESULTS

There were 5257 eligible patients identified in EMR data: 1982 (37.7 %) of these patients also had data regarding chemotherapy treatments. Of the 1982 patients who received first-line therapy, 42.3 %, 18.1 %, and 7.9 % went on to receive a second, third, and fourth line of chemotherapy, respectively. There were 11891 eligible patients identified in the administrative database; 5299 (44.6 %) had data regarding chemotherapy. Of those initiating chemotherapy, 2888 (54.5 %) received a second line and 1598 (30.2 %) received a third line of treatment. The average total cost of care during first-line therapy was $40,811 [standard deviation (SD) = $49,916], which was incurred over an average of 53.5 (SD = 63.4) days. A similar pattern was evident in second-line treatment (mean/SD, $26,588/$33,301) over 41.2 (SD = 55.7) days.

CONCLUSIONS

Costs and duration of care received vary among gastric cancer patients in the U.S. There is a need to understand which regimens may be associated with better health outcomes and to standardize treatment as appropriate.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在进行一项回顾性数据库分析,以描述胃癌患者的化疗治疗模式及治疗结果。

方法

从IMS肿瘤数据库(其中包含从各种社区医疗机构收集的电子病历(EMR)数据)以及行政索赔数据库Truven Health MarketScan® Research数据库中识别出被诊断为胃癌的个体。符合条件的患者年龄在18岁及以上,国际疾病分类第九版(ICD-9)编码为151.0 - 151.9。如果患者在索引诊断后的6个月内有癌症证据,则将其排除。

结果

在EMR数据中识别出5257名符合条件的患者:其中1982名(37.7%)患者也有化疗治疗的数据。在接受一线治疗的1982名患者中,分别有42.3%、18.1%和7.9%的患者继续接受二线、三线和四线化疗。在行政数据库中识别出11891名符合条件的患者;5299名(44.6%)有化疗相关数据。在开始化疗的患者中,2888名(54.5%)接受了二线治疗,1598名(30.2%)接受了三线治疗。一线治疗期间的平均总护理费用为40,811美元[标准差(SD)= 49,916美元],平均发生在53.5天(SD = 63.4)。二线治疗(均值/标准差,26,588美元/33,301美元)在41.2天(SD = 55.7)内也有类似模式。

结论

美国胃癌患者接受护理的费用和时长各不相同。有必要了解哪些治疗方案可能与更好的健康结果相关,并在适当时标准化治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee8/4824832/a77956e76852/10120_2015_486_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee8/4824832/6575a7d34e67/10120_2015_486_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee8/4824832/a77956e76852/10120_2015_486_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee8/4824832/6575a7d34e67/10120_2015_486_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee8/4824832/a77956e76852/10120_2015_486_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Chemotherapy treatment patterns, costs, and outcomes of patients with gastric cancer in the United States: a retrospective analysis of electronic medical record (EMR) and administrative claims data.美国胃癌患者的化疗治疗模式、成本及治疗结果:电子病历(EMR)与行政索赔数据的回顾性分析
Gastric Cancer. 2016 Apr;19(2):607-615. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0486-z. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
2
Predictors of heterogeneity in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic gastric cancer in the U.S.美国晚期/转移性胃癌一线治疗患者异质性的预测因素
Gastric Cancer. 2018 Sep;21(5):738-744. doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-0802-5. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
3
Real-world Direct Health Care Costs for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab-containing Regimens in First-line or First-line Through Second-line Therapy.贝伐珠单抗或西妥昔单抗联合方案一线或一线序贯二线治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的真实世界直接医疗成本。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017 Dec;16(4):386-396.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.03.014. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
4
Systemic Treatment Patterns With Advanced or Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Japan: A Retrospective Hospital Administrative Database Study.日本晚期或复发性非小细胞肺癌的系统治疗模式:一项回顾性医院管理数据库研究
Clin Ther. 2017 Jun;39(6):1146-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.04.010. Epub 2017 May 18.
5
Treatment patterns in patients with advanced breast cancer who were exposed to an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine: a descriptive report.接受蒽环类药物、紫杉烷类药物和卡培他滨治疗的晚期乳腺癌患者的治疗模式:描述性报告。
Clin Ther. 2010 Mar;32(3):546-54. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.03.007.
6
Treatment Patterns and Health Resource Utilization Among Patients Diagnosed With Early Stage Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer at US Community Oncology Practices.美国社区肿瘤医疗实践中早期切除的非小细胞肺癌患者的治疗模式与卫生资源利用情况
Clin Lung Cancer. 2015 Nov;16(6):486-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2014.12.010. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
7
Challenges of Using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM Codes for Soft-Tissue Sarcoma in Databases for Health Services Research.在卫生服务研究数据库中使用ICD - 9 - CM和ICD - 10 - CM编码对软组织肉瘤进行编码的挑战。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2019 Apr 1;16(Spring):1a. eCollection 2019 Spring.
8
Does site-of-care for oncology infusion therapy influence treatment patterns, cost, and quality in the United States?美国肿瘤输注治疗的护理地点会影响治疗模式、成本和质量吗?
J Med Econ. 2018 Feb;21(2):152-162. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1384736. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
9
Pathways, outcomes, and costs in colon cancer: retrospective evaluations in 2 distinct databases.结肠癌的途径、结果和成本:2 个不同数据库的回顾性评估。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 May;17 Suppl 5 Developing:SP45-52.
10
Real-World Analysis of Medical Costs and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Elderly Women with HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Everolimus-Based Therapy or Chemotherapy.对接受依维莫司治疗或化疗的HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌老年女性的医疗成本和医疗资源利用的真实世界分析。
Adv Ther. 2016 Jun;33(6):983-97. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0328-3. Epub 2016 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of end-of-Life chemotherapy: a medical and economic challenge revealed by a retrospective observational study.临终化疗评估:一项回顾性观察研究揭示的医学与经济挑战
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Aug 26;33(9):808. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09872-1.
2
Progress and prospects of biomarker-based targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer.基于生物标志物的晚期胃癌靶向治疗及免疫检查点抑制剂的研究进展与展望
Front Oncol. 2024 Jun 14;14:1382183. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1382183. eCollection 2024.
3
Ramucirumab plus irinotecan / leucovorin / 5-FU versus ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction, who failed one prior line of palliative chemotherapy: the phase II/III RAMIRIS study (AIO-STO-0415).

本文引用的文献

1
Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial.雷莫芦单抗联合紫杉醇对比安慰剂联合紫杉醇治疗既往治疗的晚期胃或胃食管结合部腺癌患者(RAINBOW):一项双盲、随机、III 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Oct;15(11):1224-35. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70420-6. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
2
Cancer statistics, 2014.癌症统计数据,2014 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Jan-Feb;64(1):9-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21208. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
3
Docetaxel versus active symptom control for refractory oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (COUGAR-02): an open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial.
雷莫芦单抗联合伊立替康/亚叶酸钙/5-FU 对比雷莫芦单抗联合紫杉醇治疗既往一线姑息化疗失败的晚期或转移性胃或胃食管结合部腺癌患者:Ⅱ/Ⅲ期 RAMIRIS 研究(AIO-STO-0415)。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Jun 19;23(1):561. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11004-z.
4
Efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with pamiparib versus placebo for advanced gastric cancer responding to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy: Phase 2 study results.帕米帕利维持治疗对比安慰剂用于一线含铂化疗治疗后进展的晚期胃癌:Ⅱ期研究结果。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jun;12(12):13145-13154. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5997. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
5
Protective role of flavonoids quercetin and silymarin in the viral-associated inflammatory bowel disease: an updated review.黄酮类化合物槲皮素和水飞蓟素在病毒相关性炎症性肠病中的保护作用:最新综述。
Arch Microbiol. 2023 May 30;205(6):252. doi: 10.1007/s00203-023-03590-0.
6
The full management from first-line to third-line treatments in patients with Her-2-negative advanced gastric cancer.人表皮生长因子受体2(Her-2)阴性晚期胃癌患者从一线到三线治疗的全程管理
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 15;12:949941. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.949941. eCollection 2022.
7
Current developments in gastric cancer: from molecular profiling to treatment strategy.胃癌的当前进展:从分子剖析到治疗策略。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Mar;20(3):155-170. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00703-w. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
8
Treatment heterogeneity and overall survival in patients with advanced/metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in the United States.美国晚期/转移性胃或胃食管交界腺癌患者的治疗异质性与总生存期
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Jun;13(3):949-957. doi: 10.21037/jgo-21-890.
9
Chemorefractory Gastric Cancer: The Evolving Terrain of Third-Line Therapy and Beyond.化学难治性胃癌:三线及后续治疗的发展态势
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 10;14(6):1408. doi: 10.3390/cancers14061408.
10
Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study.曲氟尿苷替匹嘧啶对比安慰剂用于转移性胃癌三线及后线治疗:TAGS 研究的探索性亚组分析。
ESMO Open. 2021 Aug;6(4):100200. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100200. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
多西他赛对比积极症状控制治疗难治性胃食管腺癌(COUGAR-02):一项开放标签、3 期随机对照试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jan;15(1):78-86. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70549-7. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
4
Randomized, open-label, phase III study comparing irinotecan with paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer without severe peritoneal metastasis after failure of prior combination chemotherapy using fluoropyrimidine plus platinum: WJOG 4007 trial.随机、开放标签、III 期研究比较了伊立替康与紫杉醇在氟嘧啶加铂类化疗失败后无严重腹膜转移的晚期胃癌患者中的疗效:WJOG4007 试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec 10;31(35):4438-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.5805. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
5
Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.雷莫芦单抗单药治疗既往治疗的晚期胃或胃食管结合部腺癌(REGARD):一项国际、随机、多中心、安慰剂对照、3 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 4;383(9911):31-39. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61719-5. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
6
Salvage chemotherapy for pretreated gastric cancer: a randomized phase III trial comparing chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care alone.预处理后胃癌的挽救化疗:比较化疗联合最佳支持治疗与单纯最佳支持治疗的随机 III 期试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 1;30(13):1513-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.4585. Epub 2012 Mar 12.