生物伦理学。胚胎工程引发警报。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Bioethics. Embryo engineering alarm.

作者信息

Vogel Gretchen

出版信息

Science. 2015 Mar 20;347(6228):1301. doi: 10.1126/science.347.6228.1301.

DOI:10.1126/science.347.6228.1301

PMID:25792311

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Bioethics. Embryo engineering alarm.

Science. 2015 Mar 20;347(6228):1301. doi: 10.1126/science.347.6228.1301.

Bioethics. Embryo engineering study splits scientific community.

Science. 2015 May 1;348(6234):486-7. doi: 10.1126/science.348.6234.486. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

Calls for caution in genome engineering should be a model for similar dialogue on pandemic pathogen research.

Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 17;163(10):790-1. doi: 10.7326/M15-1048. Epub 2015 Sep 8.

Perspective: Embryo editing needs scrutiny.

Nature. 2015 Dec 3;528(7580):S6. doi: 10.1038/528S6a.

Methods in Enzymology. The use of CRISPR/Cas9, ZFNs, and TALENs in generating site-specific genome alterations. Preface.

Methods Enzymol. 2014;546:xix-xx. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801185-0.09983-9.

Genome editing: 4 big questions.

Nature. 2015 Dec 3;528(7580):S17. doi: 10.1038/528S17a.

GENETIC ENGINEERING. Germline editing dominates DNA summit.

Science. 2015 Dec 11;350(6266):1299-300. doi: 10.1126/science.350.6266.1299.

Ethical concerns of American Evangelical Christians relative to genetic interventions and the Human Genome Project, 1974 to the present.

Ethics Med. 2004 Spring;20(1):23-33.

CRISPR/Cas faces the bioethics spotlight.

Biotechniques. 2015 May 1;58(5):223-7. doi: 10.2144/000114284. eCollection 2015 May.

Don't edit the human germ line.

Nature. 2015 Mar 26;519(7544):410-1. doi: 10.1038/519410a.

引用本文的文献

The role of zygotic genome activation in genetic-related reproductive medicine: Technological perspective, religious and bioethical concerns, challenges and benefits.

J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2024 Mar;22(1):100340. doi: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2023.100340. Epub 2024 Jan 23.

Researchers views about perceived harms and benefits of gene editing: A study from the MENA region.

Heliyon. 2021 Apr 23;7(4):e06860. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06860. eCollection 2021 Apr.

CRISPR as agent: a metaphor that rhetorically inhibits the prospects for responsible research.

Life Sci Soc Policy. 2018 Nov 13;14(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40504-018-0088-8.

The ethics of clinical applications of germline genome modification: a systematic review of reasons.

Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep 1;33(9):1777-1796. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey257.

CRISPR/Cas9 and mitochondrial gene replacement therapy: promising techniques and ethical considerations.

Am J Stem Cells. 2016 Aug 20;5(2):39-52. eCollection 2016.

Mitochondrial Replacement Therapy: Halachic Considerations for Enrolling in an Experimental Clinical Trial.

Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2015 Jul 30;6(3):e0031. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10216.

Human Genome Editing and Ethical Considerations.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Apr;22(2):597-9. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9675-8. Epub 2015 Jul 8.

Future think: cautiously optimistic about brain augmentation using tissue engineering and machine interface.

Front Syst Neurosci. 2015 May 19;9:72. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00072. eCollection 2015.

Oversight of human inheritable genome modification.

Nat Biotechnol. 2015 May;33(5):454-5. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3231.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验