对基因编辑技术提出谨慎使用的呼吁，应成为针对大流行病原体研究展开类似对话的典范。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Calls for caution in genome engineering should be a model for similar dialogue on pandemic pathogen research.

作者信息

Lipsitch Marc, Esvelt Kevin, Inglesby Thomas

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 17;163(10):790-1. doi: 10.7326/M15-1048. Epub 2015 Sep 8.

DOI:10.7326/M15-1048

PMID:26344802

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Calls for caution in genome engineering should be a model for similar dialogue on pandemic pathogen research.

Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 17;163(10):790-1. doi: 10.7326/M15-1048. Epub 2015 Sep 8.

Genome editing: The domestication of Cas9.

Nature. 2016 Jan 28;529(7587):468-9. doi: 10.1038/529468a.

Bioethics. Embryo engineering alarm.

Science. 2015 Mar 20;347(6228):1301. doi: 10.1126/science.347.6228.1301.

Gene drive overdrive.

Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Oct;33(10):1019-21. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3361.

Methods in Enzymology. The use of CRISPR/Cas9, ZFNs, and TALENs in generating site-specific genome alterations. Preface.

Methods Enzymol. 2014;546:xix-xx. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801185-0.09983-9.

Biotechnology. A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification.

Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):36-8. doi: 10.1126/science.aab1028. Epub 2015 Mar 19.

Bioethics. Embryo engineering study splits scientific community.

Science. 2015 May 1;348(6234):486-7. doi: 10.1126/science.348.6234.486. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

Treading the Line Between Sensational and Groundbreaking Science.

Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(12):1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1119012.

Eugenics lurk in the shadow of CRISPR.

Science. 2015 May 22;348(6237):871. doi: 10.1126/science.348.6237.871-a.

High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects.

Nature. 2016 Jan 28;529(7587):490-5. doi: 10.1038/nature16526. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

Rational Discourse on Virology and Pandemics.

mBio. 2023 Jun 27;14(3):e0031323. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00313-23. Epub 2023 Apr 19.

The ethics of clinical applications of germline genome modification: a systematic review of reasons.

Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep 1;33(9):1777-1796. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey257.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

Calls for caution in genome engineering should be a model for similar dialogue on pandemic pathogen research.

Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 17;163(10):790-1. doi: 10.7326/M15-1048. Epub 2015 Sep 8.

Genome editing: The domestication of Cas9.

Nature. 2016 Jan 28;529(7587):468-9. doi: 10.1038/529468a.

Bioethics. Embryo engineering alarm.

Science. 2015 Mar 20;347(6228):1301. doi: 10.1126/science.347.6228.1301.

Gene drive overdrive.

Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Oct;33(10):1019-21. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3361.

Methods in Enzymology. The use of CRISPR/Cas9, ZFNs, and TALENs in generating site-specific genome alterations. Preface.

Methods Enzymol. 2014;546:xix-xx. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801185-0.09983-9.

Biotechnology. A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification.

Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):36-8. doi: 10.1126/science.aab1028. Epub 2015 Mar 19.

Bioethics. Embryo engineering study splits scientific community.

Science. 2015 May 1;348(6234):486-7. doi: 10.1126/science.348.6234.486. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

Treading the Line Between Sensational and Groundbreaking Science.

Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(12):1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1119012.

Eugenics lurk in the shadow of CRISPR.

Science. 2015 May 22;348(6237):871. doi: 10.1126/science.348.6237.871-a.

High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects.

Nature. 2016 Jan 28;529(7587):490-5. doi: 10.1038/nature16526. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

Rational Discourse on Virology and Pandemics.

mBio. 2023 Jun 27;14(3):e0031323. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00313-23. Epub 2023 Apr 19.

The ethics of clinical applications of germline genome modification: a systematic review of reasons.

Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep 1;33(9):1777-1796. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey257.