Rothman R B, Bowen W D, Herkenham M, Jacobson A E, Rice K C, Pert C B
Mol Pharmacol. 1985 Mar;27(3):399-409.
The mechanism by which mu ligands inhibit the binding of prototypic delta agonists to preparations of brain membranes is controversial. Most investigators assume competitive inhibition. In this study, we examine the interaction of the mu agonist oxymorphone and delta agonist DSTLE (D-Ser2-Thr6-Leu-enkephalin) with [3H]D-Ala2-D-Leu5-enkephalin (DADL) binding to membranes of rat brain. According to the two-site competitive model, mu ligands are competitive inhibitors at both sites. The two-site allosteric model supposes that mu ligands are competitive inhibitors at one binding site, and noncompetitive inhibitors at the other binding site. Quantitative analysis of DSTLE and oxymorphone binding demonstrated that the two-site allosteric model fit the data significantly better than did the two-site competitive model, and that oxymorphone is a noncompetitive inhibitor of the lower affinity [3H]DADL-binding site. Autoradiographic studies demonstrated that the lower affinity [3H]DADL-binding site (mu-noncompetitive binding site) had an anatomical distribution apparently indistinguishable from that obtained with [3H]oxymorphone (type I pattern), supporting the hypothesis that the lower affinity delta-binding site is the delta-binding site of an opiate receptor complex consisting of interacting mu- and delta-binding sites.
μ配体抑制原型δ激动剂与脑膜制剂结合的机制存在争议。大多数研究人员认为是竞争性抑制。在本研究中,我们检测了μ激动剂羟吗啡酮和δ激动剂DSTLE(D-丝氨酸2-苏氨酸6-亮氨酸脑啡肽)与[3H]D-丙氨酸2-D-亮氨酸5-脑啡肽(DADL)结合大鼠脑膜的相互作用。根据双位点竞争模型,μ配体在两个位点都是竞争性抑制剂。双位点变构模型假设μ配体在一个结合位点是竞争性抑制剂,而在另一个结合位点是非竞争性抑制剂。对DSTLE和羟吗啡酮结合的定量分析表明,双位点变构模型对数据的拟合明显优于双位点竞争模型,并且羟吗啡酮是低亲和力[3H]DADL结合位点的非竞争性抑制剂。放射自显影研究表明,低亲和力[3H]DADL结合位点(μ非竞争性结合位点)的解剖分布与用[3H]羟吗啡酮获得的分布(I型模式)明显无法区分,支持了低亲和力δ结合位点是由相互作用的μ和δ结合位点组成的阿片受体复合物的δ结合位点这一假设。