• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and children and youth with special health care needs.2010年《患者保护与平价医疗法案》与有特殊医疗需求的儿童及青少年
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2015 Apr;36(3):207-17. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000151.
2
The Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act Evaluation Findings on Children's Health Insurance Coverage in an Evolving Health Care Landscape.《儿童健康保险计划再授权法案》对不断变化的医疗保健格局下儿童健康保险覆盖情况的评估结果。
Acad Pediatr. 2015 May-Jun;15(3 Suppl):S1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.03.007.
3
Despite Boosting Children's Coverage Rates To Historic Levels, Medicaid And CHIP Face An Uncertain Future.尽管医疗补助计划(Medicaid)和儿童健康保险计划(CHIP)将儿童的参保率提高到了历史最高水平,但它们的未来仍不确定。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Sep 1;36(9):1652-1655. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0929.
4
The search for a national child health coverage policy.对全国儿童健康覆盖政策的探寻。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Dec;33(12):2125-35. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0906.
5
CHIP and Medicaid: Evolving to Meet the Needs of Children.儿童健康保险计划(CHIP)与医疗补助计划:不断发展以满足儿童需求。
Acad Pediatr. 2015 May-Jun;15(3 Suppl):S19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.02.008.
6
In The Affordable Care Act's Shadow: The Fate Of The Children's Health Insurance Program.在《平价医疗法案》的影响下:儿童健康保险计划的命运
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Oct 1;35(10):1835-1841. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0226.
7
From EPSDT to EHBs: the future of pediatric coverage design under government financed health insurance.从 EPSDT 到 EHBs:政府资助的医疗保险下儿科保险范围设计的未来。
Pediatrics. 2013 Apr;131 Suppl 2:S142-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0252e.
8
Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Programs; Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008; the Application of Mental Health Parity Requirements to Coverage Offered by Medicaid Managed Care Organizations, the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and Alternative Benefit Plans. Final rule.医疗补助与儿童健康保险计划;2008年《精神健康平等待遇与成瘾公平法案》;精神健康平等待遇要求在医疗补助管理式医疗组织、儿童健康保险计划(CHIP)及替代福利计划所提供保险范围内的适用。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2016 Mar 30;81(61):18389-445.
9
Principles of Child Health Care Financing.儿童保健融资原则。
Pediatrics. 2017 Sep;140(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-2098. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
10
The Children's Health Insurance Program Strengthens Children's Health Care.儿童健康保险计划加强了儿童医疗保健。
Acad Pediatr. 2015 May-Jun;15(3 Suppl):S11-2. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.03.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1): Addressing the Transition from Pediatric to Adult Care.1型神经纤维瘤病(NF1):应对从儿科护理到成人护理的转变。
Pediatric Health Med Ther. 2023 Feb 9;14:19-32. doi: 10.2147/PHMT.S362679. eCollection 2023.
2
The financial burden experienced by families of preterm infants after NICU discharge.早产儿家庭在离开新生儿重症监护病房后的经济负担。
J Perinatol. 2022 Feb;42(2):223-230. doi: 10.1038/s41372-021-01213-4. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
3
Medicaid Waivers for Youth with Severe Emotional Disturbance: Associations with Public Health Coverage, Unmet Mental Health Needs & Adequacy of Health Coverage.医疗补助计划(Medicaid)对有严重情绪障碍的青年的豁免:与公共卫生保险覆盖范围、心理健康需求未得到满足和健康保险覆盖范围的充足性的关联。
Community Ment Health J. 2021 Nov;57(8):1449-1463. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00759-5. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
4
A Comparison of Health Care Expenditures for Medicaid-Insured Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Asthma in an Expanding Accountable Care Organization.《在一个不断发展的责任医疗组织中,比较有自闭症谱系障碍和哮喘的医疗补助保险儿童的医疗支出》。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2020 Mar;50(3):1031-1044. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-04327-z.
5
Disparities in Access to Easy-to-Use Services for Children with Special Health Care Needs.有特殊医疗需求儿童在获得易用服务方面的差异。
Matern Child Health J. 2016 May;20(5):1041-53. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1890-z.

本文引用的文献

1
International comparisons of infant mortality and related factors: United States and Europe, 2010.2010年美国与欧洲婴儿死亡率及相关因素的国际比较
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2014 Sep 24;63(5):1-6.
2
Quality health care for children and the Affordable Care Act: a voltage drop checklist.儿童优质医疗保健与《平价医疗法案》:一份压降检查清单。
Pediatrics. 2014 Oct;134(4):794-802. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0881. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
3
Massachusetts health reform and access for children with special health care needs.马萨诸塞州的医疗改革与有特殊医疗需求儿童的医疗服务可及性
Pediatrics. 2014 Aug;134(2):218-26. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3884. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
4
Assessing systems quality in a changing health care environment: the 2009-10 national survey of children with special health care needs.在不断变化的医疗环境中评估系统质量:2009 - 10年全国特殊医疗需求儿童调查
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Feb;19(2):353-61. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1517-9.
5
Promise and perils of the Affordable Care Act for children.
JAMA. 2014 May 7;311(17):1733-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.930.
6
Children and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: opportunities and challenges in an evolving system.
Acad Pediatr. 2014 May-Jun;14(3):225-33. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.02.004.
7
Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Programs: essential health benefits in alternative benefit plans, eligibility notices, fair hearing and appeal processes, and premiums and cost sharing; exchanges: eligibility and enrollment. Final rule.医疗补助和儿童健康保险计划:替代福利计划中的基本健康福利、资格通知、公平听证和上诉程序以及保费和费用分担;医保交易所:资格与参保。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2013 Jul 15;78(135):42159-322.
8
From EPSDT to EHBs: the future of pediatric coverage design under government financed health insurance.从 EPSDT 到 EHBs:政府资助的医疗保险下儿科保险范围设计的未来。
Pediatrics. 2013 Apr;131 Suppl 2:S142-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0252e.
9
Accountable care organizations in pediatrics: irrelevant or a game changer for children?
JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Jun;167(6):507-8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.105.
10
Accounting for kids in accountable care: a policy perspective.可问责医疗中的儿童考量:政策视角
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2013 Aug;52(8):695-8. doi: 10.1177/0009922813482181. Epub 2013 Mar 28.

2010年《患者保护与平价医疗法案》与有特殊医疗需求的儿童及青少年

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and children and youth with special health care needs.

作者信息

Feldman Heidi M, Buysse Christina A, Hubner Lauren M, Huffman Lynne C, Loe Irene M

机构信息

Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.

出版信息

J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2015 Apr;36(3):207-17. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000151.

DOI:10.1097/DBP.0000000000000151
PMID:25793891
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4387205/
Abstract

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) was designed to (1) decrease the number of uninsured Americans, (2) make health insurance and health care affordable, and (3) improve health outcomes and performance of the health care system. During the design of ACA, children in general and children and youth with special health care needs and disabilities (CYSHCN) were not a priority because before ACA, a higher proportion of children than adults had insurance coverage through private family plans, Medicaid, or the State Children's Health Insurance Programs (CHIP). ACA benefits CYSHCN through provisions designed to make health insurance coverage universal and continuous, affordable, and adequate. Among the limitations of ACA for CYSHCN are the exemption of plans that had been in existence before ACA, lack of national standards for insurance benefits, possible elimination or reductions in funding for CHIP, and limited experience with new delivery models for improving care while reducing costs. Advocacy efforts on behalf of CYSHCN must track implementation of ACA at the federal and the state levels. Systems and payment reforms must emphasize access and quality improvements for CYSHCN over cost savings. Developmental-behavioral pediatrics must be represented at the policy level and in the design of new delivery models to assure high quality and cost-effective care for CYSHCN.

摘要

《患者保护与平价医疗法案》(ACA)旨在:(1)减少未参保美国公民的数量;(2)使医疗保险和医疗保健费用可承受;(3)改善医疗保健系统的健康结果和绩效。在ACA的设计过程中,一般儿童以及有特殊医疗需求和残疾的儿童及青少年(CYSHCN)并非优先考虑对象,因为在ACA出台之前,通过私人家庭保险计划、医疗补助或州儿童健康保险计划(CHIP)获得保险覆盖的儿童比例高于成年人。ACA通过旨在使医疗保险覆盖范围普及且持续、费用可承受且充足的条款,使CYSHCN受益。ACA对CYSHCN而言存在一些局限性,包括ACA之前已存在的保险计划可获豁免、缺乏保险福利的国家标准、CHIP的资金可能被削减或取消,以及在降低成本的同时改善医疗服务的新交付模式经验有限。代表CYSHCN的宣传工作必须跟踪联邦和州层面ACA的实施情况。系统和支付改革必须强调CYSHCN的可及性和质量改善,而非成本节约。发育行为儿科学必须在政策层面以及新交付模式的设计中有所体现,以确保为CYSHCN提供高质量且具成本效益的医疗服务。