• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Pitfalls in RECIST Data Extraction for Clinical Trials: Beyond the Basics.临床试验中RECIST数据提取的陷阱:超越基础内容
Acad Radiol. 2015 Jun;22(6):779-86. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
2
Pearls and pitfalls of response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v1.1 non-target lesion assessment.实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST)v1.1 非靶病灶评估的要点与陷阱。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Feb;44(2):766-774. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1752-4.
3
Tumor response assessment: comparison between unstructured free text reporting in routine clinical workflow and computer-aided evaluation based on RECIST 1.1 criteria.肿瘤反应评估:常规临床工作流程中的非结构化自由文本报告与基于RECIST 1.1标准的计算机辅助评估之间的比较
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;143(12):2527-2533. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2488-1. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
4
Discrepant Assessments of Progressive Disease in Clinical Trials between Routine Clinical Reads and Formal RECIST 1.1 Interpretations.临床试验中常规临床解读与正式 RECIST 1.1 解读评估进展性疾病的差异。
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2023 Sep;5(5):e230001. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230001.
5
RECIST - learning from the past to build the future.RECIST-从过去中学习,为未来而建。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Mar;14(3):187-192. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.195. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
6
[RECIST and the radiologist].[实体瘤疗效评价标准与放射科医生]
Radiologia. 2014 May-Jun;56(3):193-205. doi: 10.1016/j.rx.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
7
[Comparison of RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST for Response Evaluation in Solid Tumours].[实体瘤疗效评估中RECIST 1.1与iRECIST的比较]
Klin Onkol. 2017 Winter;30(Supplementum3):32-39. doi: 10.14735/amko20173S32.
8
Radiology workflow for RECIST assessment in clinical trials: Can we reconcile time-efficiency and quality?临床试验中 RECIST 评估的放射学工作流程:我们能否兼顾效率和质量?
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Sep;118:257-263. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.07.030. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
9
Interobserver Variation in Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1.实体瘤疗效评价标准 1.1 中的观察者间变异。
Acad Radiol. 2019 Apr;26(4):489-501. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
10
A Radiologist's Guide to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.实体瘤疗效评价标准的放射科医生指南
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2019 Nov-Dec;48(6):576-585. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2018.07.016. Epub 2018 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
An Innovative Approach to Target Lesion Progression in the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1: The Enaworu 25 mm Nadir Rule.实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)1.1中针对靶病灶进展的创新方法:埃纳沃鲁25毫米最低点规则
Cureus. 2025 Apr 21;17(4):e82715. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82715. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Longitudinal deep neural networks for assessing metastatic brain cancer on a large open benchmark.用于在大型开放基准上评估转移性脑癌的纵向深度神经网络。
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 17;15(1):8170. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52414-2.
3
RECIST 1.1 assessments variability: a systematic pictorial review of blinded double reads.实体瘤疗效评价标准1.1版评估的变异性:双盲双读的系统图像回顾
Insights Imaging. 2024 Aug 7;15(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01774-w.
4
Treatment of advanced BP-NETS with lanreotide autogel/depot vs placebo: the phase III SPINET study.注射用兰瑞肽长效微球治疗晚期 BP-NETS 的疗效比较:III 期 SPINET 研究。
Endocr Relat Cancer. 2024 Jul 22;31(9). doi: 10.1530/ERC-23-0337. Print 2024 Sep 1.
5
Tumor Response Evaluation Using iRECIST: Feasibility and Reliability of Manual Versus Software-Assisted Assessments.使用iRECIST进行肿瘤反应评估:手动评估与软件辅助评估的可行性和可靠性
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 29;16(5):993. doi: 10.3390/cancers16050993.
6
Can we predict discordant RECIST 1.1 evaluations in double read clinical trials?在双读临床试验中,我们能否预测不一致的RECIST 1.1评估结果?
Front Oncol. 2023 Oct 4;13:1239570. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1239570. eCollection 2023.
7
Dissociated response to PD-1 inhibitors combined with radiotherapy in patients with advanced metastatic solid tumors: a single-center experience.PD-1 抑制剂联合放疗治疗晚期转移性实体瘤患者的分离反应:单中心经验。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul 27;21(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03122-6.
8
Circulating immune response proteins predict the outcome following disease progression of osimertinib treated epidermal growth factor receptor-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients.循环免疫反应蛋白可预测奥希替尼治疗的表皮生长因子受体阳性非小细胞肺癌患者疾病进展后的预后。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2023 Jan 31;12(1):14-26. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-22-577. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
9
iRECIST-based versus non-standardized free text reporting of CT scans for monitoring metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective comparison.基于 iRECIST 标准与非标准化自由文本报告对转移性肾细胞癌 CT 扫描监测的回顾性比较。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug;148(8):2003-2012. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-03997-0. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
10
Improved Multimodal Tumor Necrosis Imaging with IRDye800CW-DOTA Conjugated to an Albumin-Binding Domain.使用与白蛋白结合域偶联的IRDye800CW-DOTA改进多模态肿瘤坏死成像。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 9;14(4):861. doi: 10.3390/cancers14040861.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving accuracy in reporting CT scans of oncology patients: assessing the effect of education and feedback interventions on the application of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria.提高肿瘤患者 CT 扫描报告准确性:评估教育和反馈干预对实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST)标准应用的影响。
Acad Radiol. 2013 Mar;20(3):351-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.12.002.
2
Informatics in radiology: improving clinical work flow through an AIM database: a sample web-based lesion tracking application.放射学中的信息学:通过 AIM 数据库改善临床工作流程:一个基于网络的病变跟踪应用示例。
Radiographics. 2012 Sep-Oct;32(5):1543-52. doi: 10.1148/rg.325115752. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
3
New Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: comparison with original RECIST and impact on assessment of tumor response to targeted therapy.实体瘤反应评价标准(RECIST)在晚期非小细胞肺癌中的应用:与原始 RECIST 的比较及其对靶向治疗肿瘤反应评估的影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Sep;195(3):W221-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3928.
4
Revised RECIST guideline version 1.1: What oncologists want to know and what radiologists need to know.修订版 RECIST 指南 1.1:肿瘤学家想知道的和放射科医生需要知道的。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):281-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.4110.
5
Quantitative imaging in oncology patients: Part 1, radiology practice patterns at major U.S. cancer centers.肿瘤患者的定量成像:第 1 部分,美国主要癌症中心的放射科实践模式。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jul;195(1):101-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2850.
6
Quantitative imaging in oncology patients: Part 2, oncologists' opinions and expectations at major U.S. cancer centers.肿瘤患者的定量成像:第 2 部分,美国主要癌症中心肿瘤学家的意见和期望。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jul;195(1):W19-30. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3541.
7
Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma.改良版 RECIST(mRECIST)用于肝细胞癌的评估。
Semin Liver Dis. 2010 Feb;30(1):52-60. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247132. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
8
Living with imperfection.与不完美共存。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 10;28(2):191-2. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8574. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
9
Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria.实体瘤免疫治疗疗效评价指南:免疫相关反应标准。
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Dec 1;15(23):7412-20. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1624. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
10
Has quantitative multimodal imaging of treatment response arrived?治疗反应的定量多模态成像已经到来了吗?
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Nov 1;15(21):6473-5. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2257. Epub 2009 Oct 27.

临床试验中RECIST数据提取的陷阱:超越基础内容

Pitfalls in RECIST Data Extraction for Clinical Trials: Beyond the Basics.

作者信息

Abramson Richard G, McGhee Carrie R, Lakomkin Nikita, Arteaga Carlos L

机构信息

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, 1161 21st Avenue South, CCC-1121 MCN, Nashville, TN 37232-2675.

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, 1161 21st Avenue South, CCC-1121 MCN, Nashville, TN 37232-2675.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2015 Jun;22(6):779-86. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2015.01.015
PMID:25794800
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4429002/
Abstract

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is a standardized methodology for determining therapeutic response to anticancer therapy using changes in lesion appearance on imaging studies. Many radiologists are now using RECIST in their routine clinical workflow, as part of consultative arrangements, or within dedicated imaging core laboratories. Although basic RECIST methodology is well described in published articles and online resources, inexperienced readers may encounter difficulties with certain nuances and subtleties of RECIST. This article illustrates a set of pitfalls in RECIST assessment considered to be "beyond the basics." These pitfalls were uncovered during a quality improvement review of a recently established cancer imaging core laboratory staffed by radiologists with limited prior RECIST experience. Pitfalls are presented in four categories: (1) baseline selection of lesions, (2) reassessment of target lesions, (3) reassessment of nontarget lesions, and (4) identification of new lesions. Educational and operational strategies for addressing these pitfalls are suggested. Attention to these pitfalls and strategies may improve the overall quality of RECIST assessments performed by radiologists.

摘要

实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)是一种标准化方法,用于根据影像学研究中病灶外观的变化来确定抗癌治疗的疗效。现在,许多放射科医生在其日常临床工作流程中、作为会诊安排的一部分或在专门的影像核心实验室中使用RECIST。尽管已发表的文章和在线资源中对基本的RECIST方法有详细描述,但经验不足的读者在理解RECIST的某些细微差别时可能会遇到困难。本文阐述了一组被认为是“超出基础内容”的RECIST评估陷阱。这些陷阱是在对一个最近成立的癌症影像核心实验室进行质量改进审查时发现的,该实验室的放射科工作人员此前的RECIST经验有限。陷阱分为四类:(1)病灶的基线选择,(2)靶病灶的重新评估,(3)非靶病灶的重新评估,以及(4)新病灶的识别。文中还提出了应对这些陷阱的教育和操作策略。关注这些陷阱和策略可能会提高放射科医生进行RECIST评估的整体质量。