• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种用于在基于模拟的教育中评估临床伦理咨询技能的评估工具:ACES项目。

Developing an Evaluation Tool for Assessing Clinical Ethics Consultation Skills in Simulation Based Education: The ACES Project.

作者信息

Wasson Katherine, Parsi Kayhan, McCarthy Michael, Siddall Viva Jo, Kuczewski Mark

机构信息

The Stritch School of Medicine and The Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics, Loyola University Chicago, 2160 S. 1st Avenue, Bldg. 120, Room 280, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA.

The Department of Medical Education, The Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, 2160 S. 1st Avenue, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA.

出版信息

HEC Forum. 2016 Jun;28(2):103-13. doi: 10.1007/s10730-015-9276-6.

DOI:10.1007/s10730-015-9276-6
PMID:25794891
Abstract

The American Society for Bioethics and Humanities has created a quality attestation (QA) process for clinical ethics consultants; the pilot phase of reviewing portfolios has begun. One aspect of the QA process which is particularly challenging is assessing the interpersonal skills of individual clinical ethics consultants. We propose that using case simulation to evaluate clinical ethics consultants is an approach that can meet this need provided clear standards for assessment are identified. To this end, we developed the Assessing Clinical Ethics Skills (ACES) tool, which identifies and specifies specific behaviors that a clinical ethics consultant should demonstrate in an ethics case simulation. The aim is for the clinical ethics consultant or student to use a videotaped case simulation, along with the ACES tool scored by a trained rater, to demonstrate their competence as part of their QA portfolio. The development and piloting of the tool is described.

摘要

美国生物伦理与人文学会为临床伦理顾问制定了质量认证(QA)流程;审查档案的试点阶段已经开始。质量认证流程中一个特别具有挑战性的方面是评估个体临床伦理顾问的人际沟通技巧。我们认为,使用案例模拟来评估临床伦理顾问是一种能够满足这一需求的方法,前提是要确定明确的评估标准。为此,我们开发了评估临床伦理技能(ACES)工具,该工具可识别并详细说明临床伦理顾问在伦理案例模拟中应展现的特定行为。目的是让临床伦理顾问或学生使用录像案例模拟,以及由经过培训的评分者评分的ACES工具,来展示其能力,作为其质量认证档案的一部分。本文描述了该工具的开发和试点情况。

相似文献

1
Developing an Evaluation Tool for Assessing Clinical Ethics Consultation Skills in Simulation Based Education: The ACES Project.开发一种用于在基于模拟的教育中评估临床伦理咨询技能的评估工具:ACES项目。
HEC Forum. 2016 Jun;28(2):103-13. doi: 10.1007/s10730-015-9276-6.
2
A Pilot Evaluation of Portfolios for Quality Attestation of Clinical Ethics Consultants.临床伦理顾问质量认证组合的初步评估。
Am J Bioeth. 2016;16(3):15-24. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1134705.
3
What Is the Minimal Competency for a Clinical Ethics Consult Simulation? Setting a Standard for Use of the Assessing Clinical Ethics Skills (ACES) Tool.临床伦理咨询模拟的最低能力要求是什么?为评估临床伦理技能(ACES)工具的使用设定标准。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019 Jul-Sep;10(3):164-172. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1634653. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
4
Philosophy of Healthcare Ethics Practice Statements: Quality Attestation and Beyond.《医疗保健伦理实践声明的理念:质量认证及其他》
HEC Forum. 2018 Dec;30(4):341-360. doi: 10.1007/s10730-018-9354-7.
5
Case Complexity and Quality Attestation for Clinical Ethics Consultants.临床伦理顾问的病例复杂性与质量认证
J Clin Ethics. 2015 Fall;26(3):231-40.
6
Health care ethics consultation: an update on core competencies and emerging standards from the American Society For Bioethics and Humanities' core competencies update task force.医疗保健伦理学咨询:美国生物伦理学和人文科学协会核心能力更新工作组关于核心能力和新兴标准的最新更新。
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(2):3-13. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.750388.
7
Developing, Administering, and Scoring the Healthcare Ethics Consultant Certification Examination.制定、管理和评分医疗保健伦理顾问认证考试。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2019 Sep;49(5):15-22. doi: 10.1002/hast.1050.
8
Telemedicine as a tool to bring clinical ethics expertise to remote locations.远程医疗作为一种将临床伦理专业知识带到偏远地区的工具。
HEC Forum. 2015 Jun;27(2):189-99. doi: 10.1007/s10730-015-9272-x.
9
Just a Collection of Recollections: Clinical Ethics Consultation and the Interplay of Evaluating Voices.只是一组回忆:临床伦理咨询与评估声音的相互作用
HEC Forum. 2016 Dec;28(4):301-320. doi: 10.1007/s10730-016-9301-4.
10
Expertise, Ethics Expertise, and Clinical Ethics Consultation: Achieving Terminological Clarity.专业知识、伦理专业知识与临床伦理会诊:实现术语明晰
J Med Philos. 2016 Aug;41(4):416-33. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhw014. Epub 2016 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating assessment tools of the quality of clinical ethics consultations: a systematic scoping review from 1992 to 2019.评估临床伦理咨询质量的评估工具:1992年至2019年的系统综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jul 1;21(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00492-4.
2
What Is the Minimal Competency for a Clinical Ethics Consult Simulation? Setting a Standard for Use of the Assessing Clinical Ethics Skills (ACES) Tool.临床伦理咨询模拟的最低能力要求是什么?为评估临床伦理技能(ACES)工具的使用设定标准。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019 Jul-Sep;10(3):164-172. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1634653. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
3
The Application of Standards and Recommendations to Clinical Ethics Consultation in Practice: An Evaluation at German Hospitals.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing and testing a checklist to enhance quality in clinical ethics consultation.制定并测试一份清单以提高临床伦理咨询的质量。
J Clin Ethics. 2014 Winter;25(4):281-90.
2
Quality attestation for clinical ethics consultants: a two-step model from the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.临床伦理顾问的质量认证:美国生物伦理学和人文学会的两步模型。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Sep-Oct;43(5):26-36. doi: 10.1002/hast.198.
3
The clinical ethics credentialing project: preliminary notes from a pilot project to establish quality measures for ethics consultation.
标准和建议在临床伦理咨询实践中的应用:德国医院的评估。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Jun;23(3):793-799. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9805-y. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
临床伦理资质认证项目:关于一项建立伦理咨询质量衡量标准的试点项目的初步记录
HEC Forum. 2010 Mar;22(1):65-72. doi: 10.1007/s10730-010-9122-9.
4
Charting the future. Credentialing, privileging, quality, and evaluation in clinical ethics consultation.规划未来。临床伦理咨询中的认证、授权、质量和评估。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2009 Nov-Dec;39(6):23-33. doi: 10.1353/hcr.0.0208.
5
Evaluating clinical ethics consultation: a European perspective.评估临床伦理咨询:欧洲视角
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2009 Fall;18(4):406-19. doi: 10.1017/S0963180109090604.
6
Project examining effectiveness in clinical ethics (PEECE): phase 1-- descriptive analysis of nine clinical ethics services.临床伦理有效性研究项目(PEECE):第一阶段——九项临床伦理服务的描述性分析
J Med Ethics. 2005 Sep;31(9):505-12. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.010595.
7
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.克鲁赞诉密苏里州卫生部主任案
Wests Supreme Court Report. 1990 Jun 25;110:2841-92.
8
Evaluation research and the future of ethics consultation.评估研究与伦理咨询的未来。
J Clin Ethics. 1996 Summer;7(2):146-9.
9
Concepts in evaluation applied to ethics consultation research.
J Clin Ethics. 1996 Summer;7(2):116-21.
10
High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes.高一致性但低卡帕值:II. 解决悖论
J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):551-8. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90159-m.