• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床伦理顾问质量认证组合的初步评估。

A Pilot Evaluation of Portfolios for Quality Attestation of Clinical Ethics Consultants.

机构信息

a New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Center.

b Cleveland Clinic.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2016;16(3):15-24. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1134705.

DOI:10.1080/15265161.2015.1134705
PMID:26913652
Abstract

Although clinical ethics consultation is a high-stakes endeavor with an increasing prominence in health care systems, progress in developing standards for quality is challenging. In this article, we describe the results of a pilot project utilizing portfolios as an evaluation tool. We found that this approach is feasible and resulted in a reasonably wide distribution of scores among the 23 submitted portfolios that we evaluated. We discuss limitations and implications of these results, and suggest that this is a significant step on the pathway to an eventual certification process for clinical ethics consultants.

摘要

虽然临床伦理咨询是一项高风险的工作,在医疗保健系统中的重要性日益凸显,但制定质量标准的进展却具有挑战性。在本文中,我们描述了利用组合作为评估工具的试点项目的结果。我们发现,这种方法是可行的,并且在我们评估的 23 份提交组合中,得分分布相当广泛。我们讨论了这些结果的局限性和影响,并认为这是临床伦理顾问最终认证过程的重要一步。

相似文献

1
A Pilot Evaluation of Portfolios for Quality Attestation of Clinical Ethics Consultants.临床伦理顾问质量认证组合的初步评估。
Am J Bioeth. 2016;16(3):15-24. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1134705.
2
Finding the Right Tools for Assessing Quality of Clinical Ethics Consultation.寻找评估临床伦理咨询质量的合适工具。
Am J Bioeth. 2016;16(3):1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1150682.
3
Case Complexity and Quality Attestation for Clinical Ethics Consultants.临床伦理顾问的病例复杂性与质量认证
J Clin Ethics. 2015 Fall;26(3):231-40.
4
Ensuring quality in clinical ethics consultations: perspectives of ethicists regarding process and prior training of consultants.确保临床伦理咨询的质量:伦理学家对咨询过程和咨询师前期培训的看法。
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(2):29-31. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.750393.
5
What the HEC-C? An Analysis of the Healthcare Ethics Consultant-Certified Program: One Year in.HEC-C 是什么?医疗保健伦理顾问认证项目的分析:一年过去了。
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Mar;20(3):9-18. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1714794.
6
Charting the future. Credentialing, privileging, quality, and evaluation in clinical ethics consultation.规划未来。临床伦理咨询中的认证、授权、质量和评估。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2009 Nov-Dec;39(6):23-33. doi: 10.1353/hcr.0.0208.
7
The "quality attestation" process and the risk of the false positive.“质量认证”过程与假阳性风险
Hastings Cent Rep. 2014 May-Jun;44(3):19-22. doi: 10.1002/hast.311.
8
Toward competency-based certification of clinical ethics consultants: a four-step process.迈向基于能力的临床伦理顾问认证:一个四步流程。
J Clin Ethics. 2010 Spring;21(1):14-22.
9
A code of ethics for health care ethics consultants: journey to the present and implications for the field.医疗伦理顾问伦理准则:当下的历程与该领域的启示。
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(5):38-51. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1021966.
10
Developing an Evaluation Tool for Assessing Clinical Ethics Consultation Skills in Simulation Based Education: The ACES Project.开发一种用于在基于模拟的教育中评估临床伦理咨询技能的评估工具:ACES项目。
HEC Forum. 2016 Jun;28(2):103-13. doi: 10.1007/s10730-015-9276-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical Issues faced by Home Care Physicians and Nurses in Japan and their Ethics Support Needs: a Nationwide Survey.日本居家护理医生和护士面临的伦理问题及其伦理支持需求:一项全国性调查。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2023 Jan 27;15(4):457-477. doi: 10.1007/s41649-023-00238-5. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Evidence-guided approach to portfolio-guided teaching and assessing communications, ethics and professionalism for medical students and physicians: a systematic scoping review.循证方法在医学生和医生的沟通、伦理和专业精神的课程设置和评估中的应用:系统的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 28;13(3):e067048. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067048.
3
Clinical Ethics Consultations and the Necessity of NOT Meeting Expectations: I Never Promised You a Rose Garden.
临床伦理咨询与不满足期望的必要性:我从未承诺过给你玫瑰园。
HEC Forum. 2024 Jun;36(2):147-165. doi: 10.1007/s10730-022-09496-6. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
4
Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review.研究生伦理培训计划:系统范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jun 9;21(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02644-5.
5
Bioethical challenges in clinical practice of the 20th century.20世纪临床实践中的生物伦理挑战。
Rev Clin Esp. 2020 Jul 29. doi: 10.1016/j.rce.2020.06.010.
6
Evaluating assessment tools of the quality of clinical ethics consultations: a systematic scoping review from 1992 to 2019.评估临床伦理咨询质量的评估工具:1992年至2019年的系统综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jul 1;21(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00492-4.
7
Reinforcing medical authority: clinical ethics consultation and the resolution of conflicts in treatment decisions.强化医学权威:临床伦理咨询与治疗决策冲突的解决
Sociol Health Illn. 2020 Feb;42(2):307-326. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13003. Epub 2019 Sep 29.
8
What Is the Minimal Competency for a Clinical Ethics Consult Simulation? Setting a Standard for Use of the Assessing Clinical Ethics Skills (ACES) Tool.临床伦理咨询模拟的最低能力要求是什么?为评估临床伦理技能(ACES)工具的使用设定标准。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019 Jul-Sep;10(3):164-172. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1634653. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
9
Philosophy of Healthcare Ethics Practice Statements: Quality Attestation and Beyond.《医疗保健伦理实践声明的理念:质量认证及其他》
HEC Forum. 2018 Dec;30(4):341-360. doi: 10.1007/s10730-018-9354-7.
10
The Emergence of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Insights From a National Collaborative.临床研究伦理咨询的出现:来自国家合作的见解。
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Jan;18(1):39-45. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1401156.