Ehlers Vicky, Kampf Gabriel, Stender Elmar, Willershausen Brita, Ernst Claus-Peter
Assistant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Doctoral student, Department of Operative Dentistry, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Jun;113(6):609-15. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.001. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
Bond stability between zirconia crowns and luting cement and between cement and dentin is a main concern; however, only limited evidence is available as to its longevity.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to measure the retentive strengths of 7 self-adhesive cements (RelyX Unicem Aplicap, RelyX Unicem Clicker, RelyX Unicem 2 Automix, iCEM, Maxcem Elite, Bifix SE, SpeedCem), 2 adhesive cements with self-etch primers (Panavia 21, SEcure), 1 glass ionomer cement (Ketac Cem), 1 resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Meron Plus), and 1 zinc phosphate cement for luting zirconia crowns (LAVA) to extracted teeth after thermocycling with or without 1 year of water storage.
Two-hundred-forty extracted human molars (2 treatments; n=10 per cement) were prepared in a standardized manner. All cements were used according to the manufacturers' recommendations. The intaglios of the crowns were treated with airborne-particle abrasion. After thermocycling (×5000, 5°C/55°C) with or without 1 year of water storage, the cemented ceramic crowns were removed by using a Zwick universal testing device. Statistical analyses were done with the Wilcoxon rank sum and the 2-independent-samples Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
Median retentive strengths [MPa] for specimens thermocycled only/thermocycled with 1 year of water storage were as follows: Panavia 21: 1.7/2.5, SEcure: 3.0/3.0, RelyX Unicem Aplicap: 3.1/3.4, RelyX Unicem Clicker: 4.1/4.2, RelyX Unicem 2 Automix: 3.8/3.1, iCEM: 2.3/2.7, Maxcem Elite: 3.0/3.2, Bifix SE: 1.7/1.7, SpeedCem: 1.3/1.6, Meron Plus: 3.1/2.7, Ketac Cem: 1.4/1.4, and zinc phosphate cement: 1.1/1.6. Statistically significant differences were found only among specimens thermocycled only or thermocycled with 1-year water storage (P<.001).
Significant differences in retentive strengths were observed among cements after thermocycling only or thermocycling with 1 year of water storage, but not for the effect of the additional 1 year of water storage.
氧化锆全冠与粘接水门汀之间以及水门汀与牙本质之间的粘接稳定性是主要关注点;然而,关于其长期稳定性的证据有限。
本体外研究的目的是测量7种自粘接水门汀(RelyX Unicem Aplicap、RelyX Unicem Clicker、RelyX Unicem 2 Automix、iCEM、Maxcem Elite、Bifix SE、SpeedCem)、2种含自酸蚀底漆的粘接水门汀(Panavia 21、SEcure)、1种玻璃离子水门汀(Ketac Cem)、1种树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(Meron Plus)和1种用于粘接氧化锆全冠(LAVA)至离体牙的磷酸锌水门汀在经过或未经过1年水储存的热循环后的固位强度。
以标准化方式制备240颗离体人磨牙(2种处理;每种水门汀n = 10)。所有水门汀均按照制造商的建议使用。全冠的内表面采用空气颗粒喷砂处理。在经过或未经过1年水储存的热循环(×5000,5°C/55°C)后,使用Zwick万能测试装置移除粘接的陶瓷全冠。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验和两独立样本Kolmogorov - Smirnov检验进行统计分析。
仅经过热循环/经过1年水储存热循环的标本的中位固位强度[MPa]如下:Panavia 21:1.7/2.5,SEcure:3.0/3.0,RelyX Unicem Aplicap:3.1/3.4,RelyX Unicem Clicker:4.1/4.2,RelyX Unicem 2 Automix:3.8/3.1,iCEM:2.3/2.7,Maxcem Elite:3.0/3.2,Bifix SE:1.7/1.7,SpeedCem:1.3/1.6,Meron Plus:3.1/2.7,Ketac Cem:1.4/1.4,以及磷酸锌水门汀:1.1/1.6。仅在仅经过热循环或经过1年水储存热循环的标本之间发现有统计学显著差异(P <.001)。
仅经过热循环或经过1年水储存热循环后,各水门汀的固位强度存在显著差异,但额外1年水储存的影响不显著。