Suppr超能文献

单孔腹腔镜辅助经脐超微创子宫肌瘤切除术(SPLA-TUM)与单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术:一项随机对照试验

Single-port laparoscopically assisted-transumbilical ultraminilaparotomic myomectomy (SPLA-TUM) versus single port laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Yuk Jin-Sung, Ji Hyun Young, Kim Kye Hyun, Lee Jung Hun

机构信息

The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MizMedi Hospital, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 May;188:83-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether single-port laparoscopically assisted-transumbilical ultraminilaparotomic myomectomy (SPLA-TUM) has a shorter operating time than single port laparoscopic myomectomy (SP-LM), without negatively affecting postoperative pain and cosmesis.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a randomized controlled trial at a University teaching hospital. A total of 92 premenopausal women with symptomatic, superficial intramural or subserosal fibroids were randomized to receive either SPLA-TUM or SP-LM. The primary outcome measured was the operating time. The secondary outcome measures included postoperative pain, as measured by a visual analog scale (VAS) at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48h after the operation, and cosmetic outcomes, as measured by the Vancouver scar scale (VSS) and patient satisfaction with the scars, using a VAS at 3 postoperative months.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the patient demographics or in the clinical characteristics of the resected fibroids between the two groups. The operation results showed no differences in the hemoglobin changes, return of bowel activity, hospital stay, and complication rate between the groups. The mean operating time in the SPLA-TUM group was shorter than that in the SP-LM group (87.0±32.7min compared with 102.3±32.9min, P=0.026). The patients in each group demonstrated no differences in their postoperative pain levels, VSS scores, and satisfaction with the scars, but the SPLA-TUM group had a longer umbilical wound compared with the SP-LM group. Two (4.3%) patients in the SPLA-TUM group received SP-LM. One (2.2%) patient in the SP-LM group and two (4.3%) patients in the SPLA-TUM group were converted to two or three port laparoscopic myomectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

SPLA-TUM has a shorter operating time than SP-LM due to convenient suturing and knotting; the two procedures have comparable postoperative pain levels and cosmetic outcomes. However, further study is needed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of SPLA-TUM.

摘要

目的

评估单孔腹腔镜辅助经脐超微创剖腹子宫肌瘤切除术(SPLA-TUM)的手术时间是否比单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术(SP-LM)更短,且不影响术后疼痛和美观效果。

研究设计

我们在一所大学教学医院进行了一项随机对照试验。总共92例有症状的绝经前女性,患有表浅肌壁间或浆膜下肌瘤,被随机分配接受SPLA-TUM或SP-LM。测量的主要结局是手术时间。次要结局指标包括术后疼痛,通过术后2、6、12、24和48小时的视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量,以及美容效果,通过温哥华瘢痕量表(VSS)和术后3个月使用VAS评估患者对瘢痕的满意度来测量。

结果

两组患者的人口统计学特征或切除肌瘤的临床特征无差异。手术结果显示两组在血红蛋白变化、肠道活动恢复、住院时间和并发症发生率方面无差异。SPLA-TUM组的平均手术时间比SP-LM组短(分别为87.0±32.7分钟和102.3±32.9分钟,P = 0.026)。每组患者的术后疼痛水平、VSS评分和对瘢痕的满意度无差异,但SPLA-TUM组的脐部伤口比SP-LM组长。SPLA-TUM组有2例(4.3%)患者接受了SP-LM。SP-LM组有1例(2.2%)患者和SPLA-TUM组有2例(4.3%)患者转为两孔或三孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术。

结论

由于缝合和打结方便,SPLA-TUM的手术时间比SP-LM短;两种手术的术后疼痛水平和美容效果相当。然而,需要进一步研究来评估SPLA-TUM的长期结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验