• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术新方法的手术结果:单孔与改良缝合技术

Surgical outcomes of a new approach to laparoscopic myomectomy: single-port and modified suture technique.

作者信息

Choi Chel Hun, Kim Tae-Hyun, Kim Seo-Hee, Choi June-Kuk, Park Jin-Young, Yoon Aera, Lee Yoo-Young, Kim Tae-Joong, Lee Jeong-Won, Kim Byoung-Gie, Bae Duk-Soo

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):580-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.096. Epub 2013 Dec 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.096
PMID:24384072
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To introduce a new technique of laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) using single-port access and a modified suture technique.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of medical records.

SETTING

University medical center.

PATIENTS

From October 2011 through December 2012, 55 consecutive patients underwent single-port LM using a modified suture technique with Hem-o-lock ligation clips and myoma morcellation through the umbilical incision site (Choi's LM). As a historic control, patients who underwent conventional multi-port LM from January 2008 through November 2010 were included in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Medical records for 157 patients (55 Choi's LM and 102 LM) were reviewed retrospectively. Inclusion criteria were <3 symptomatic myomas ≤10 cm. Outcomes measured were operative time, estimated blood loss, complications, length of postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative pain.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Age, symptoms resulting from myomas, location and type of dominant myomas, and number of myomas were similar in the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in mean diameter of the myomas between the groups (6.8 cm vs 7.0 cm; p = .40). The mean duration of the operation was shorter in the Choi's LM group compared with the conventional LM group (104 min vs 152 min; p < .001). Choi's LM also resulted in a statistically significant decrease in blood loss (139 mL vs 222 mL; p < .001). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the Choi's LM group than in the conventional LM group at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Choi's LM with modified suture technique is associated with shorter operative time and less postoperative pain. A prospective trial is needed to confirm the results.

摘要

研究目的

介绍一种使用单孔入路和改良缝合技术的腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术(LM)新技术。

设计

病历回顾性研究。

地点

大学医学中心。

患者

2011年10月至2012年12月,55例连续患者采用改良缝合技术、Hem-o-lock结扎夹及通过脐部切口部位进行肌瘤粉碎术,接受了单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术(Choi氏腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术)。作为历史对照,2008年1月至2010年11月接受传统多孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的患者纳入本研究。

干预措施

对157例患者(55例Choi氏腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术和102例腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术)的病历进行回顾性分析。纳入标准为<3个有症状的肌瘤且最大直径≤10厘米。测量的结果包括手术时间、估计失血量、并发症、术后住院时间和术后疼痛。

测量指标及主要结果

两组患者的年龄、肌瘤引起的症状、主要肌瘤的位置和类型以及肌瘤数量相似。两组间肌瘤的平均直径无显著差异(6.8厘米对7.0厘米;p = 0.40)。与传统腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术组相比,Choi氏腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术组的平均手术时间更短(104分钟对152分钟;p < 0.001)。Choi氏腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术还使失血量在统计学上显著减少(139毫升对222毫升;p < 0.001)。术后1、6、12和24小时,Choi氏腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术组的术后疼痛评分显著低于传统腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术组。

结论

采用改良缝合技术的Choi氏腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术与较短的手术时间和较少的术后疼痛相关。需要进行前瞻性试验来证实这些结果。

相似文献

1
Surgical outcomes of a new approach to laparoscopic myomectomy: single-port and modified suture technique.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术新方法的手术结果:单孔与改良缝合技术
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):580-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.096. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
2
Laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic myomectomy: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.腹腔镜单孔子宫肌瘤切除术与传统腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的比较:一项多中心、随机、对照试验。
Fertil Steril. 2015 Nov;104(5):1325-31. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1137. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
3
Long-term outcomes of single-port laparoscopic myomectomy using a modified suture technique.采用改良缝合技术的单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的长期疗效
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020 Mar;63(2):164-172. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2020.63.2.164. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
4
Single port laparoscopic myomectomy with intracorporeal suture-tying and transumbilical morcellation.单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术联合体内缝合打结及经脐旋切术
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Oct;181:200-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.07.051. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
5
A case-control study to compare the outcome of women treated by two minimally invasive procedures-ultraminilaparotomy myomectomy and laparoscopic myomectomy.一项病例对照研究,旨在比较两种微创手术——超小切口子宫肌瘤剔除术和腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术——治疗女性患者的效果。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;57(2):264-269. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.02.016.
6
Comparison of Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Large Myomas With and Without Leuprolide Acetate.大子宫肌瘤腹腔镜下肌瘤切除术联合与不联合醋酸亮丙瑞林的比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Sep-Oct;22(6):992-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.04.026. Epub 2015 May 7.
7
Single-port laparoscopically assisted-transumbilical ultraminilaparotomic myomectomy (SPLA-TUM) versus single port laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized controlled trial.单孔腹腔镜辅助经脐超微创子宫肌瘤切除术(SPLA-TUM)与单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术:一项随机对照试验
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 May;188:83-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
8
Advantages of Single-Port Laparoscopic Myomectomy Compared with Conventional Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study.单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术比较的优势:一项随机对照研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jan;25(1):124-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.651. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
9
Perioperative Outcomes of Myomectomy for Extreme Myoma Burden: Comparison of Surgical Approaches.子宫肌瘤切除术治疗巨大子宫肌瘤的围手术期结局:手术方式的比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Sep-Oct;26(6):1095-1103. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.10.022. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
10
Laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy versus conventional laparoscopic myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes.经脐单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术:手术结果比较
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):775-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
A retrospective analysis of single-port laparoscopy in myoma management.子宫肌瘤治疗中单孔腹腔镜手术的回顾性分析
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 5;10(15):e35821. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35821. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
2
Comparison of efficacy of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic treatment for uterine leiomyoma: a latest meta-analysis.单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗子宫肌瘤的疗效比较:一项最新的荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 2;13:1192582. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1192582. eCollection 2023.
3
Laparoscopic myomectomy - The importance of surgical techniques.
腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术——手术技术的重要性。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 20;10:1158264. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1158264. eCollection 2023.
4
Coaxial-Robotic Single-Site Myomectomy: Surgical Outcomes Compared with Robotic Single-Site Myomectomy by Propensity Score Matching Analysis.同轴机器人单孔子宫肌瘤切除术:通过倾向评分匹配分析与机器人单孔子宫肌瘤切除术比较的手术结果
J Pers Med. 2022 Dec 22;13(1):17. doi: 10.3390/jpm13010017.
5
Laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for the treatment of canine dioctophymosis.腹腔镜肾保留手术治疗犬双盘吸虫病
J Vet Med Sci. 2022 Apr 15;84(4):618-623. doi: 10.1292/jvms.21-0097. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
6
An analysis of the surgical outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy and multi-port laparoscopic myomectomy.腹腔镜单孔子宫肌瘤切除术与多孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的手术效果分析。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jun;9(11):927. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-1862.
7
Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case-control study.机器人单部位与多部位子宫肌瘤剔除术:病例对照研究。
BMC Surg. 2021 May 27;21(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01245-9.
8
A different technique in gasless, laparoendoscopic, single-site myomectomy.无气腹腔镜单孔子宫肌瘤剔除术的一种不同技术。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Oct;35(10):5508-5514. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08044-y. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
9
Incisional hernia after 2498 single-port access (SPA) gynecologic surgery over a 10-year period.10 年间 2498 例单孔腹腔镜妇科手术的切口疝。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 15;10(1):17388. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74471-5.
10
Long-term outcomes of single-port laparoscopic myomectomy using a modified suture technique.采用改良缝合技术的单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的长期疗效
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020 Mar;63(2):164-172. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2020.63.2.164. Epub 2020 Feb 12.