Terkildsen Thomas, Petersen Sofie
Department of Communication and Psychology, University of Aalborg, Kroghstræde 3, 9220, Aalborg Ø, Denmark,
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2015 Jun;49(2):202-6. doi: 10.1007/s12124-015-9300-z.
The aim of this article is to explore the future of qualitative research as seen from a students' perspective. This exploration will initially be incited through a discussion of the use of the term 'qualitative research', and the risks associated with the use of such an umbrella term. It is discussed that the use of an overarching umbrella term can lead to an overhomogenized understanding of qualitative research, that fails to represent the diversity and variety of methodological and epistemological approaches that exist within this research paradigm. It is also discussed that this overhomogenization reinforces the idea of qualitative research as an anti-doctrine to quantitative research, which is argued to discourage interparadigmatic integration. Lastly, it is considered how these (mis)conceptions of qualitative research influence how psychology students are taught about research methodology and how this education could affect these (mis)conceptions. We advocate that the future for qualitative research in psychology should be ensured through a restructure and a refocus on an educational level. This change should overall be centered around teaching students how to be reflective research practitioners based on an in-depth understanding of the variety of epistemologies within both meta-research-paradigms.
本文旨在从学生的视角探讨质性研究的未来。这种探索最初将通过对“质性研究”一词的使用以及使用这一总括性术语所带来的风险的讨论来引发。文中讨论了使用一个总体性的总括性术语可能导致对质性研究的过度同质化理解,这种理解无法体现该研究范式中存在的方法和认识论方法的多样性。还讨论了这种过度同质化强化了质性研究作为定量研究的反教条的观念,这被认为不利于跨范式整合。最后,探讨了这些关于质性研究的(错误)观念如何影响心理学学生对研究方法的学习,以及这种教育如何可能影响这些(错误)观念。我们主张,应通过在教育层面进行重组和重新聚焦来确保心理学质性研究的未来。总体而言,这种改变应以教导学生如何基于对两种元研究范式中各种认识论的深入理解成为反思性研究从业者为核心。