• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[秸秆还田对水稻碳固存特性及产量形成的影响]

[Effects of straw incorporation on rice carbon sequestration characteristics and grain yield formation].

作者信息

Pei Peng-Gang, Zhang Jun-Hua, Zhu Lian-Feng, Yu Sheng-Miao, Hu Zhi-Hua

出版信息

Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2014 Oct;25(10):2885-91.

PMID:25796896
Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the effects of straw incorporation on rice dry matter accumulation and transportation, rice carbon sequestration and grain yield formation. The experiment included four levels of straw incorporation: 0 (control), 4000, 6000 and 8000 kg · hm(-2). Hybrid rice cultivar Zhongzheyou 1 was used in this experiment. The results showed that the average rice dry matter accumulation amount of the three straw incorporation treatments was increased by 63.03 g · m(-2) compared with the control, and that of straw incorporation of 6000 kg · hm(-2) showed the most favorable result, which was 154.40 g · m(-2) higher than the control. Effects of straw incorporation on rice dry matter accumulation showed the best performance from the maximum tillering stage to the full heading stage, and the dry matter accumulation at this stage was 71.25 g · m(-2) higher than the control. Compared with the control, the average dry matter exportation rate and apparent transformation rate from rice stem and leaf in the straw incorporation treatments were increased by 4.2% and 3.7%, respectively. The highest dry matter exportation rate and apparent transformation rate from rice stem and leaf were observed in the straw incorporation treatment of 6000 kg · hm(-2), which were increased by 12.8% and 11.1% compared to the control, respectively. The average rice carbon sequestration from the straw incorporation treatments was increased by 55.38 g · m(-2) compared with the control, and straw incorporation of 6000 kg · hm(-2) performed best with an increase of 17.8% compared with the control. Straw incorporation played a positive role in regulating the carbon sequestration of stem and leaf at the early growth stage and carbon sequestration of spike at the late growth stage. The average grain yield from the straw incorporation treatments was increased by 794.59 kg · hm(-2) (9.5% higher) compared with the control. Rice grain yields from the straw incorporation treatments of 6000 and 4000 kg · hm(-2) were significantly higher than the control, while rice grain yield from the straw incorporation treatment of 8000 kg · hm(-2) did not show a significant increase compared to the control. The rice grain yield was closely related to the yield components, and the increase of effective panicles may be the main reason for the higher grain yields in the straw incorporation treatments. Effective panicles in the straw incorporation treatments was averagely 8.41 spikes · m(-2) more than the control.

摘要

进行了一项田间试验,以研究秸秆还田对水稻干物质积累与转运、水稻碳固存及籽粒产量形成的影响。该试验包括四个秸秆还田水平:0(对照)、4000、6000和8000 kg·hm(-2)。本试验采用杂交水稻品种中浙优1号。结果表明,与对照相比,三种秸秆还田处理的水稻平均干物质积累量增加了63.03 g·m(-2),其中秸秆还田量为6000 kg·hm(-2)的处理效果最佳,比对照高154.40 g·m(-2)。秸秆还田对水稻干物质积累的影响在最高分蘖期至齐穗期表现最佳,此阶段干物质积累量比对照高71.25 g·m(-2)。与对照相比,秸秆还田处理的水稻茎叶干物质输出率和表观转化率分别提高了4.2%和3.7%。秸秆还田量为6000 kg·hm(-2)的处理水稻茎叶干物质输出率和表观转化率最高,分别比对照提高了12.8%和11.1%。与对照相比,秸秆还田处理的水稻平均碳固存量增加了55.38 g·m(-2),秸秆还田量为6000 kg·hm(-2)的处理表现最佳,比对照增加了17.8%。秸秆还田对生长前期茎叶碳固存和生长后期穗部碳固存具有积极的调节作用。与对照相比,秸秆还田处理的水稻平均籽粒产量增加了794.59 kg·hm(-2)(提高了9.5%)。秸秆还田量为6000和4000 kg·hm(-2)的处理水稻籽粒产量显著高于对照,而秸秆还田量为8000 kg·hm(-2)的处理水稻籽粒产量与对照相比未显著增加。水稻籽粒产量与产量构成因素密切相关,有效穗数增加可能是秸秆还田处理水稻籽粒产量较高的主要原因。秸秆还田处理的有效穗数平均比对照多8.41穗·m(-2)。

相似文献

1
[Effects of straw incorporation on rice carbon sequestration characteristics and grain yield formation].[秸秆还田对水稻碳固存特性及产量形成的影响]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2014 Oct;25(10):2885-91.
2
[Effects of rice straw returning mode on rice grain yield and soil carbon pool management index in double rice-cropping system].[稻草还田方式对双季稻种植系统水稻产量及土壤碳库管理指数的影响]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2013 Jun;24(6):1572-8.
3
[Effects of different baynyardgrass varieties on grain yield formation of rice at different nitrogen application levels.].不同稗草品种对不同施氮水平下水稻产量形成的影响。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2016 Nov 18;27(11):3559-3568. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201611.015.
4
[Carbon sequestration effects of rice straw return in double season paddy field in Southern China].中国南方双季稻田稻草还田的碳固存效应
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2011 Dec;22(12):3196-202.
5
[Effects of combined application of pig manure with urea on grain yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency in rice-wheat rotation system].猪粪与尿素配施对稻麦轮作系统粮食产量及氮素利用效率的影响
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Apr;30(4):1088-1096. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201904.031.
6
[Effects of different colored plastic film mulching and planting density on dry matter accumulation and yield of spring maize.].不同颜色地膜覆盖与种植密度对春玉米干物质积累及产量的影响
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2018 Jan;29(1):113-124. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201801.019.
7
[Effects of straw returning amount and type on soil nitrogen and its composition].[秸秆还田量和类型对土壤氮素及其组成的影响]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Apr;30(4):1243-1252. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201904.008.
8
[Effects of different sowing dates and low-light stress at heading stage on the physiological characteristics and grain yield of hybrid rice].不同播期及抽穗期弱光胁迫对杂交水稻生理特性和产量的影响
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2012 Oct;23(10):2737-44.
9
[Effects of wheat-straw returning into paddy soil on dissolved organic carbon contents and rice grain yield].[稻草还田对稻田土壤溶解有机碳含量及水稻产量的影响]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2015 Feb;26(2):430-6.
10
[Effects of irrigation mode on winter wheat yield and water- and nutrient use efficiencies under maize straw returning to field].[秸秆还田条件下灌溉方式对冬小麦产量及水分养分利用效率的影响]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2011 Oct;22(10):2511-6.